Instituto Politécnico Nacional - IPN vs Universidad Anáhuac vs Instituto Superior de Intérpretes y Traductores - ISIT vs ISDI Madrid Digital Business School vs Ironhack

Side-by-side comparison from 69 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Universidad Anáhuac (4.60)
Instituto Politécnico Nacional - IPN: wins 0/7 categories
Universidad Anáhuac: wins 4/7 categories
Instituto Superior de Intérpretes y Traductores - ISIT: wins 0/7 categories
ISDI Madrid Digital Business School: wins 0/7 categories
Ironhack: wins 3/7 categories
UCAD University - UCAD : wins 0/7 categories
Normal 2 de Nezahualcóyotl - EN2N: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Architecture and Civil Engineering
Cancun, Mexico
4.60
Top
Read more reviews
33 reviews
×
Best programme: Communication
Barcelona, Spain
3.00
Read more reviews
2 reviews
×
Best programme: UX/UI Design (User Experience / User Interface Design)
Mexico City, Mexico
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Category ratings
Facilities
3.69
4.50
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Location
4.20
4.50
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Professors
4.10
4.41
Win
Not rated
Not rated
3.00
Not rated
Not rated
Internationality
3.90
4.59
Win
Not rated
Not rated
3.00
Not rated
Not rated
Student life
4.24
4.63
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Value
4.59
4.63
Win
Not rated
Not rated
3.00
Not rated
Not rated
Accommodation
3.64
4.66
Win
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Excellent, experienced, and dedicated instructors.
  • +Relevant, industry-tailored programs for professional development.
  • +Strong focus on student learning and future success.
  • +Leadership and values development
  • +Academic excellence and practical application
  • +Supportive community and modern facilities

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • +Practical, hands-on learning with immediate application
  • +Experienced, professional instructors with industry expertise
  • +Engaging hybrid learning format

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frequent disruptions.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning and comfort.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support frustrates students.
  • -Administrative & management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources are a problem.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support is evident.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues.
  • -Perceived lack of value for money.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

A diverse set of ratings reveals this institution excels in several key areas. The university is particularly lauded for its **Value** and **Student Life**, both receiving the highest marks. Conversely, **Accomodation** presents a weaker point, alongside **Facilities**, which also fall below the average. Other aspects like **Location**, **Professors**, and **Internationality** generally fall within a positive range.

This institution garners excellent scores, with accommodation standing out as its strongest area at 4.65625. Student life and value also received high marks. Professors represent the area with the lowest rating at 4.40625, though it remains a very positive score. Overall, the university demonstrates considerable strengths in most aspects evaluated.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

With exceptional marks in Facilities and Location, this institution clearly excels in its physical environment and accessibility. Student Life also receives top scores, suggesting a vibrant campus experience. Conversely, the university's weakest areas lie in its Professors and Internationality, both rated a moderate three. Value also sits at this mid-tier rating, indicating areas for potential improvement.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

With a 4.33/5 average, university students praise dedicated and qualified teachers, well-structured courses, and excellent training. Some minor infrastructure and resource challenges were noted.

With ~97% positive feedback and an average of 4.58/5, students praise academic excellence, leadership development, and integral personal growth programs. No negative reviews were recorded.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

With an average rating of 3/5, feedback is evenly split, with ~50% positive and ~50% negative. Positive comments highlight practical, hands-on learning and professional instructors. Negative reviews express dissatisfaction with program value and staff.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
52%
67%
0%
0%
50%
0%
0%
4★
30%
39%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
3★
18%
3%
100%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
50%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close