Universidad del valle de México - UVM vs Instituto Tecnológico de Aguascallientes - ITA vs Universidad Panamericana vs Le Cordon Bleu Paris vs ISDI Madrid Digital Business School

Side-by-side comparison from 51 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Instituto Tecnológico de Aguascallientes - ITA (5.00)
Universidad del valle de México - UVM: wins 0/4 categories
Instituto Tecnológico de Aguascallientes - ITA: wins 0/4 categories
Universidad Panamericana: wins 1/4 categories
Le Cordon Bleu Paris: wins 2/4 categories
ISDI Madrid Digital Business School: wins 0/4 categories
Ironhack: wins 1/4 categories
Universidad Autónoma de Aguascalientes - UAA: wins 0/4 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Marketing
Aguascalientes, Mexico
4.10
Read more reviews
12 reviews
×
Best programme: Accounting
Best programme: Culinary Arts
Barcelona, Spain
3.00
Read more reviews
2 reviews
×
Best programme: UX/UI Design (User Experience / User Interface Design)
Best programme: Pedagogical Education
Category ratings
Facilities
4.21
Not rated
4.33
4.56
Not rated
5.00
5.00
Location
4.36
Not rated
4.25
4.78
Not rated
5.00
5.00
Professors
4.50
Not rated
4.50
4.67
Win
Not rated
3.00
3.00
Internationality
3.63
Not rated
3.33
4.67
Win
Not rated
3.00
3.00
Student life
4.47
Not rated
3.67
4.00
Not rated
5.00
5.00
Value
3.94
Not rated
4.33
Win
4.00
Not rated
3.00
3.00
Accommodation
3.62
Not rated
3.75
3.22
Not rated
4.00
Win
3.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Strong academic programs and well-prepared professors
  • +Accessible education through scholarship opportunities
  • +Engaging extracurriculars and a sense of community
  • +Exceptional teachers and supportive peers
  • +Advanced laboratory facilities
  • +Holistic student development
  • +Highly qualified professors and academic excellence
  • +Strong business programs and professional connections
  • +Personalized attention and strong sense of community
  • +exceptional quality of teaching and knowledgeable, approachable instructors
  • +strong emphasis on precision, quality, and professional skill development
  • +welcoming environment and supportive alumni network

Nothing to show

  • +Practical, hands-on learning with immediate application
  • +Experienced, professional instructors with industry expertise
  • +Engaging hybrid learning format
  • +Exceptional faculty expertise and preparation
  • +Vibrant and engaging student life with memorable experiences
Cons
  • -Aggressive and persistent enrollment outreach
  • -Ineffective and overwhelming communication channels
  • -Outdated facilities
  • -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are frequently criticized.
  • -Lack of resources and support negatively impacts the learning experience.
  • -Intellectualism is perceived as cultish.
  • -Institutions are seen as unreliable sources of truth.
  • -There's a critique of seeking purpose through complex language and power.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology hinder the learning experience.
  • -Lack of career support and industry relevance leads to dissatisfaction.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues.
  • -Perceived lack of value for money.
  • -Administrative and management issues, including unfair practices and lack of objective teacher evaluation.
  • -Outdated and limited academic programs that do not foster knowledge expansion or professional growth beyond the local area.
  • -High tuition fees, especially for a public institution.
Rating summary
What students say

A comprehensive review reveals a university that excels in key academic and student experience areas. Professors and student life are particularly strong, receiving high marks at 4.5 and 4.47 respectively. Facilities and location also score well. Conversely, accommodation and internationality represent areas for potential improvement, with ratings around 3.6. The overall value of the education is rated moderately at 3.94.

Considering the provided ratings, all aspects of the university received a score of zero. This indicates a complete lack of positive feedback in every surveyed category, including facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and overall value. Without any positive indicators, it is impossible to highlight strongest or weakest areas, as all facets are rated equally low.

The university is highly rated for its professors, achieving a strong 4.5. Facilities and value also score well, both at 4.33. Student life, while respectable at 3.67, and accommodation at 3.75 represent areas where ratings are somewhat lower. Internationality is rated the lowest among all categories at 3.33.

This institution receives high marks for its Location, scoring 4.78, and for its Professors and Internationality, both at 4.67. Facilities also rate well at 4.56. Student Life and Value are both solid at 4.00. The weakest area is Accomodation, which received a rating of 3.22.

Nothing to show

With exceptional marks in Facilities and Location, this institution clearly excels in its physical environment and accessibility. Student Life also receives top scores, suggesting a vibrant campus experience. Conversely, the university's weakest areas lie in its Professors and Internationality, both rated a moderate three. Value also sits at this mid-tier rating, indicating areas for potential improvement.

This institution excels in areas like **Facilities** and **Location**, both receiving perfect scores. **Student Life** also garners a top rating, indicating a vibrant campus experience. Conversely, **Professors**, **Accomodation**, **Internationality**, and **Value** received moderate scores, suggesting these are areas with room for improvement.

Reviews summary
Highlights

Approximately 56% of reviews praise well-prepared professors and ample study resources. A small portion (~8%) mentions issues with aggressive enrollment calls and ineffective communication channels.

The single review is highly positive, with a 5/5 rating. This ~100% positive feedback highlights strong satisfaction with teachers, friends, and the development of student potential. New laboratories are also praised.

University students praise academic excellence, professor quality, and modern facilities. ~92% of feedback is positive, with one reviewer expressing concerns about intellectualism.

All 9 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.67/5. Students highlight exceptional teaching quality and knowledgeable instructors, along with impeccable facilities. The curriculum and emphasis on precision are frequently praised.

Nothing to show

With an average rating of 3/5, feedback is evenly split, with ~50% positive and ~50% negative. Positive comments highlight practical, hands-on learning and professional instructors. Negative reviews express dissatisfaction with program value and staff.

Student feedback is mixed, with a 50% split between positive and negative reviews, resulting in a 3.5/5 average. Positive comments highlight excellent teachers and engaging student life. Negative feedback points to issues with teacher evaluation, outdated programs, and limited opportunities.

Rating distribution
5★
32%
100%
33%
67%
0%
50%
50%
4★
24%
0%
58%
33%
0%
0%
0%
3★
36%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
4%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
50%
1★
4%
0%
8%
0%
0%
50%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
Acquire the knowledge you need at your pace

The International Business Administration degree at Universidad del Valle de México is an academic journey that will strenghten the skills that you have while traching you diverse ways to apply them to the business world. Accounting, negotiation, finance, marketing, international trade, are just some of the main topics to mention that this degree allows you to deep dive into. Upon graduating, every student will have the required tools and skills to follwo their own professional path.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Student in 2013

I really enjoyed my time at LCB! I've found that my skills when I entered the work force were much higher than others. I think though there was a big portion missing in recipe development and composition. True- we did learn it through memorizing the recipes, but we really were missing classes on how different ingredients affect the final textures.. how you can change them... etc. That I still am not an expert in .. and I create recipes! Ouf! Also, I don't know if you still do a month of sugar work... but that really wasn't necessary and should be either cut or minimized to just 2 lessons. It's such a niche skill to know that I would have really preferred more technical skills. I loved the old location. The "rumors" I'm getting about the new location are that it's not as good, unfortunately - that i's become more of a money focused/marketing machine. I really hope that this image can be fixed as I love LCB and enjoyed my time there! Oh also - there should be more help for students to get jobs and featuring old students accomplishments - from cookbook launches to new bakeries so that current and old students can support them.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close