Universidad Tecnológica de la Sierra Hidalguense - UTSH vs Linnaeus University - LNU vs German Graduate School of Management and Law vs University of Fukui vs New Design Institute of Perugia - NID

Side-by-side comparison from 35 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Linnaeus University - LNU (4.10)
Universidad Tecnológica de la Sierra Hidalguense - UTSH: wins 0/7 categories
Linnaeus University - LNU: wins 3/7 categories
German Graduate School of Management and Law: wins 1/7 categories
University of Fukui: wins 2/7 categories
New Design Institute of Perugia - NID: wins 0/7 categories
University of Algiers 2 - Abou EL Kacem Saâdallah: wins 1/7 categories
Euromed University of Fez: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Marketing
Best programme: Bachelor of Law LLB
Best programme: Medicine
Best programme: English and American Studies
Category ratings
Facilities
Not rated
4.16
Win
4.00
4.00
Not rated
2.83
Not rated
Location
Not rated
3.83
4.00
Win
3.00
Not rated
2.67
Not rated
Professors
Not rated
4.12
4.00
4.00
Not rated
4.17
Win
Not rated
Internationality
Not rated
4.27
Win
4.00
3.00
Not rated
3.33
Not rated
Student life
Not rated
4.23
Win
4.00
4.00
Not rated
2.83
Not rated
Value
Not rated
3.81
4.00
5.00
Win
Not rated
3.50
Not rated
Accommodation
Not rated
3.92
4.00
5.00
Win
Not rated
2.50
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros

Nothing to show

  • +Supportive and helpful professors and staff.
  • +Good facilities and diverse academic programs.
  • +Welcoming international environment and convenient resources.
  • +Rich academic environment and diverse community
  • +Balanced curriculum of theory and practical application
  • +Scenic, natural environment
  • +Welcoming to exchange students
  • +Strong medical programs

Nothing to show

  • +Diverse and comprehensive academic programs
  • +Supportive and involved faculty
  • +Rich cultural and historical campus environment

Nothing to show

Cons

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues, particularly concerning international student affairs.
  • -Mediocre teaching quality with limited value beyond independent learning.
  • -Lack of industry connections and career support.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Facilities are consistently described as outdated.
  • -Lack of engagement from instructors is a significant drawback.
  • -Administrative and management issues are consistently frustrating.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are major complaints.
  • -Lack of resources and support negatively impacts learning.

Nothing to show

  • -Poor communication between students and administration.

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

Nothing to show

Academic and student life aspects of the university received high marks. The institution particularly excelled in Internationality (4.27) and Student Life (4.23), reflecting a vibrant and globally-connected campus environment. Facilities (4.16) and Professors (4.12) also garnered positive feedback. Conversely, Value (3.81) and Location (3.83) were the lowest-rated categories, suggesting areas for potential improvement. Accommodations also scored moderately (3.92).

Across the board, this institution garners consistent praise, indicating a strong all-around experience. Every evaluated aspect, from facilities and professors to student life and accommodations, received a rating of 4. Notably, its location and internationality also scored an impressive 4. No single area stands out as significantly weaker or stronger than the others, suggesting a uniformly positive offering.

This university scores exceptionally well in accommodations and value, both receiving a perfect 5. Facilities, professors, and student life are also strong, earning a solid 4. Conversely, location and internationality received moderate ratings of 3, indicating areas for potential development.

Nothing to show

This institution performs strongest in its academic offerings and international appeal. Professors receive an impressive average rating of 4.17, and the university also scores well for its internationality (3.33) and value (3.5). Conversely, areas such as accommodation and location present opportunities for improvement, with ratings of 2.5 and 2.67 respectively. Facilities and student life are rated moderately, around 2.83.

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

Nothing to show

About 80% of reviews are positive, highlighting supportive professors, a welcoming atmosphere, and good facilities. A small portion (~7%) of negative feedback points to issues with teaching quality and administrative support.

With one review, the average rating is 4/5 stars. This feedback is ~100% positive, highlighting an enriching academic experience with a thoughtfully designed curriculum. No negative feedback was reported.

The single review is highly positive, rating 4/5 stars. It highlights the beautiful countryside campus and opportunities for exchange students, particularly in emergency medicine and neuroscience.

Nothing to show

With an average rating of 3.5/5, ~74% of university student reviews are positive, highlighting diverse programs, engaged faculty, and unique campus environments. A small amount of negative feedback, ~17%, notes communication gaps.

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
0%
41%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
4★
0%
41%
100%
100%
0%
67%
0%
3★
0%
11%
0%
0%
0%
17%
0%
2★
0%
4%
0%
0%
0%
17%
0%
1★
0%
4%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

This Is Where Your Dreams Die

Rating: ★★☆☆☆ (2/5 — one extra star because tuition was free) I studied Software Technology at Linnaeus University between 2022 and 2025. In my experience, the quality of teaching was mediocre. I quickly stopped attending lectures because most added little beyond what I could learn independently. Industry connections were almost nonexistent: no internship support, no company-led workshops, no hackathons, and no clear pathways into the tech sector. The only recurring event was the annual job fair, but many representatives seemed unsure what they were seeking; most offered no internships or projects and there was rarely any follow-up, so it felt more promotional than student-focused. Entrepreneurship support was minimal. When we started a student project, there was no funding, no events, no network, and very limited guidance — essentially just one counsellor providing basic advice. Faculty culture felt very political and unresponsive to student feedback. When issues were raised formally, they were often dismissed, though quiet changes were occasionally made later. I personally experienced hostile and dismissive behaviour from a lecturer in the tech faculty, which I reported to the Student Union in 2024 along with other classmates. The case was closed in the lecturer’s favour, yet the university quietly implemented some of the changes we had requested. The complaint process left me uncertain about its independence, and I believe there’s a need for more transparent procedures and external oversight. On the positive side, there are a few excellent professors who genuinely care about their students and involve them in research, but they are a small minority and you have to actively seek them out. Overall, I’m deeply disappointed with the university’s approach to education and student development. I feel I wasted three years of potential growth and opportunity here. Prospective students should do thorough research and speak directly with current students before enrolling.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close