Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo - UFES vs Dalhousie University vs Maseno University vs The Kisumu National Polytechnic - TKNP vs Great Lakes University of Kisumu - GLUK

Side-by-side comparison from 150 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo - UFES: wins 3/6 categories
Dalhousie University: wins 1/6 categories
Maseno University: wins 1/6 categories
The Kisumu National Polytechnic - TKNP: wins 1/6 categories
Great Lakes University of Kisumu - GLUK: wins 0/6 categories
Maasai Mara University: wins 0/6 categories
Tom Mboya University: wins 0/6 categories
Comparing
Best programme: School of Engineering/Technology
halifax, Canada
4.40
Read more reviews
51 reviews
×
Best programme: Commerce
kisumu, Kenya
4.50
Read more reviews
86 reviews
×
Best programme: Business Administration
Best programme: 3D Design
Best programme: Applied Statistics
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Category ratings
Facilities
3.67
4.26
Win
4.14
4.00
Not rated
3.88
Not rated
Location
4.67
Win
4.57
4.31
4.50
Not rated
4.50
Not rated
Professors
4.33
4.24
4.49
Win
4.00
Not rated
4.25
Not rated
Internationality
3.00
4.24
3.97
4.50
Win
Not rated
3.63
Not rated
Student life
4.33
Win
4.32
4.21
4.00
Not rated
3.75
Not rated
Value
5.00
Win
4.31
4.53
4.50
Not rated
4.38
Not rated
Accommodation
2.67
3.88
3.98
4.00
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Good professors and STEM labs
  • +Affordable food options
  • +Free education
  • +Strong academic programs and intellectually stimulating environment
  • +Supportive and diverse campus community with excellent professors
  • +Rewarding experiences and personal growth opportunities
  • +Strong academic environment and practical learning focus
  • +Supportive atmosphere with approachable, passionate instructors
  • +Well-structured programmes with engaging teaching methods
  • +Practical, hands-on learning and career-oriented education
  • +Dedicated lecturers and supportive learning environment
  • +Development of essential soft skills and overall personal growth

Nothing to show

  • +Dedicated and knowledgeable lecturers
  • +Holistic learning and diverse activities
  • +Quality education and modern facilities

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning.
  • -Course content is often perceived as irrelevant or poorly structured.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources hinder learning.
  • -Inflexible course structures and limited support options are disliked.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology hinder learning.
  • -Limited communication and transparency from the institution.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance.
  • -Inconsistent and unfair grading policies.
  • -Unresponsive and unhelpful administrative support.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of resources hinder learning.
  • -Poor teaching quality and unengaging course content are common complaints.

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

This institution demonstrates exceptional strengths in several key areas. The location and student life both receive outstanding marks, complemented by a perfect score for value. Professors are also highly regarded, contributing to a positive academic experience. However, accommodation presents a notable weakness, with a significantly lower rating. Facilities are rated moderately, and internationality falls within an average range.

This institution demonstrates excellent performance across several key metrics. Its location received the highest marks, alongside a strong showing for student life and value. Facilities and internationality were also rated favorably. Accommodations, however, represent the weakest area, indicating room for improvement in this aspect of the student experience.

Overall, this university garners strong feedback, particularly excelling in the value of education, with a rating of 4.53. Professors also receive high marks at 4.49, alongside a positive student life experience at 4.21. The weakest areas appear to be accommodation and internationality, both scoring just under 4.0. Facilities and location also received solid, though not outstanding, scores.

This institution garners consistently high marks, with its **location** and **internationality** standing out as its strongest attributes at 4.5. Its **value for money** also received a top score of 4.5. Other aspects, including **facilities**, **professors**, **student life**, and **accommodation**, are all rated a solid 4, indicating a well-rounded and positive university experience across the board.

Nothing to show

The university demonstrates considerable strengths in its **Location** (4.5) and **Value** (4.375), alongside an impressive score for **Professors** (4.25). **Student Life** and **Accomodation** also received favorable marks. The **Internationality** aspect, however, registers as the lowest rated area at 3.625, with **Facilities** also performing slightly below average at 3.875.

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

All feedback is positive, with an average rating of 4/5 stars. Students highlight good professors and labs, as well as affordable food options. Some infrastructure and course content could be improved.

University reviews highlight a strong academic environment with supportive community and rewarding experiences, praised by ~96% of students. Some note minor administrative inefficiencies.

With ~93% of 86 reviews being positive, students praise the university's supportive atmosphere, practical learning, and well-structured programs. No negative feedback was recorded.

With an average rating of 4.5/5, these 2 reviews are entirely positive. Students highlight excellent communication, teamwork, dedication, love for education, and the quality of courses and lecturers. Practical learning and supportive lecturers preparing students for real-world situations are also praised.

Nothing to show

With an average rating of 4.5/5, ~88% of reviewers are positive. Students commend dedicated lecturers, quality education, and a holistic learning environment. No negative feedback was provided.

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
0%
39%
60%
50%
0%
63%
0%
4★
100%
57%
31%
50%
0%
25%
0%
3★
0%
4%
8%
0%
0%
13%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nice place to be

I enjoyed learning at the university. The lectures were nice and students were nice to everyone, I found it easier to interact with everyone at school. However, life was tough in general due to lack of enough funds to support my student upkeep. But I recommend the school to anyone

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close