University of Eldoret vs Murang'a University of Technology vs Murang'a University of Technology - mut vs Kenya Technical Trainers College - KTTC vs Kenya Institute of Mass Communication - KIMC

Side-by-side comparison from 43 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Kenya Technical Trainers College - KTTC (5.00)
University of Eldoret: wins 0/5 categories
Murang'a University of Technology: wins 0/5 categories
Murang'a University of Technology - mut: wins 0/5 categories
Kenya Technical Trainers College - KTTC: wins 5/5 categories
Kenya Institute of Mass Communication - KIMC: wins 0/5 categories
Pioneer International University - PIU: wins 0/5 categories
KIRIRI Women's University of Science and Technology - KWUST: wins 0/5 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Applied Statistics and Programming
Best programme: Software Engineering
Best programme: Accounting and Auditing
Best programme: Business Administration
Best programme: Communication and Public Relations
Best programme: BA International Relations and Diplomacy
Best programme: Business Administration
Category ratings
Facilities
4.41
3.83
4.50
5.00
Win
4.00
4.50
4.67
Location
4.71
4.29
4.10
5.00
5.00
3.00
3.33
Professors
4.39
4.14
4.50
5.00
4.00
5.00
4.67
Internationality
4.28
3.43
4.30
5.00
Win
4.00
4.00
2.33
Student life
4.53
4.00
4.40
5.00
Win
3.00
3.50
4.00
Value
4.67
3.86
4.50
5.00
Win
4.50
4.50
4.67
Accommodation
4.31
3.86
4.44
5.00
Win
3.50
3.50
4.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Supportive and devoted lecturers
  • +Opportunities for innovation and career growth
  • +Positive campus environment and diverse student body
  • +Strong academics and dedicated lecturers
  • +Vibrant campus life and sense of community
  • +Quality IT and applied science programs
  • +Dedicated, supportive lecturers
  • +Conducive learning environment
  • +Technological advancements and innovation
  • +Passionate and knowledgeable professors
  • +Extensive student support and resources
  • +Engaging learning environment
  • +Practical skills development for career readiness
  • +Personal and talent growth opportunities
  • +Accessible faculty and personalized learning
  • +Practical, hands-on education
  • +Supportive and collaborative environment
  • +Empowering and supportive academic environment
  • +Personalized attention and approachable lecturers
  • +Strong focus on key disciplines for women
Cons
  • -Administrative & management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources are a significant drawback.
  • -Course content is perceived as irrelevant or poorly delivered.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of necessary resources are prevalent concerns.
  • -Communication breakdowns and unresponsiveness from staff create a negative experience.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
  • -Facilities are often described as outdated and poorly maintained.
  • -Communication with staff and instructors is frequently poor.
  • -Administrative & management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities are a significant drawback.
  • -Lack of resources and support hinders learning.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a common complaint.
  • -Lack of resources and support negatively impacts the learning experience.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of resources hinder learning.
  • -Unsupportive or unavailable instructors negatively impact student experience.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause constant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Ineffective teaching and lack of student support are major concerns.
Rating summary
What students say

This institution receives particularly high marks for its **location** (4.71) and **value** (4.67), indicating these are key strengths. **Student life** also scores well at 4.53. The **facilities** (4.41), **professors** (4.39), and **accommodation** (4.31) are all rated positively. The area with the lowest score, though still respectable, is **internationality** (4.28).

With several strong points, this university garners high marks for its location, closely followed by its professors and student life. Accommodation and value also received solid scores. However, internationality is a noted area for improvement, as is the rating for facilities. Overall, it presents a mixed but generally positive picture, with a few distinct areas of excellence and some opportunities for growth.

This institution receives strong marks across the board, with particularly high scores for Facilities and Professors, both at 4.5. Student Life and Accommodation are also well-regarded, scoring 4.4 and 4.44 respectively. Internationality is rated at 4.3, while the Location stands out as the relatively weakest area, scoring 4.1. Overall, the university presents a robust offering with excellent academic and student experience components.

With perfect scores across the board, this institution excels in every surveyed area. Facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value all received top marks. There are no weak areas identified, indicating a consistently outstanding university experience and offering.

This university garners excellent scores for its location, achieving a perfect 5. Its facilities and professors also stand out with strong 4-star ratings, complemented by a solid 4.5 for value. Areas for development include student life and accommodation, both scoring a respectable 3 to 3.5 stars. Internationality also received a positive 4-star rating.

An overall strong performance is evident, with the university excelling in **Professors (5/5)** and **Facilities (4.5/5)**, and offering excellent **Value (4.5/5)**. Areas that appear less developed include **Location (3/5)** and **Student Life (3.5/5)**, which received moderate ratings. Internationality also scored well at 4/5.

This institution demonstrates exceptional strengths in its facilities, professors, and value, all receiving outstanding scores. Student life and accommodation are also rated positively. However, the university's location receives a moderate rating, and its internationality is a noted area for improvement, scoring significantly lower than other categories.

Reviews summary
Highlights

With an average rating of 4.78/5, approximately 100% of reviews are positive. Students praise brilliant, supportive lecturers and a great environment, though some mention limited resources like internet and computers, and the cold weather.

University reviews show high satisfaction, with ~100% positive feedback. Students highlight dedicated lecturers and solid academics. Some noted areas for improvement in facilities and results.

Students consistently praise Murang'a University of Technology for its dedicated and supportive lecturers who facilitate timely syllabus completion. They also highlight the clean, safe, and vibrant campus environment with strong technological investment, contributing to quality education.

With a perfect 5/5 average rating, this university receives overwhelmingly positive feedback. Students highlight knowledgeable professors and a rich array of resources for success, including excellent library, labs, and strong support services.

With an average rating of 4/5 and 100% positive feedback, students highlight strong practical skill development and opportunities to foster personal talents. No negative comments were received.

With an average rating of 4.5/5, 100% of feedback is positive. Students praise small class sizes, accessible faculty, and a supportive, hands-on learning environment. The university offers diverse courses and good campus maintenance.

With 100% positive feedback and an average rating of 4/5, students praise Kiriri Women's University for its supportive and empowering academic environment. Lecturers are described as approachable and knowledgeable, fostering personalized attention and growth.

Rating distribution
5★
78%
43%
60%
100%
0%
50%
0%
4★
22%
57%
40%
0%
100%
50%
100%
3★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
School as a flame of knowledge.

It is a good place to learn and fully explore your career. What I like is the commitment of the staff to make the school a better place. And what I dislike is the cold weather that makes school experience bad ,at times. I recommend that the school to have enough infrastructure for the well being of the students especially the lecture hall seats.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close