Johan Cruyff Institute vs University of Amsterdam - UvA vs Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam - VU Amsterdam vs Hotelschool The Hague vs ONCAMPUS Global

Side-by-side comparison from 268 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tio Business School (5.00)
Johan Cruyff Institute: wins 0/7 categories
University of Amsterdam - UvA: wins 0/7 categories
Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam - VU Amsterdam: wins 0/7 categories
Hotelschool The Hague: wins 0/7 categories
ONCAMPUS Global: wins 1/7 categories
Tio Business School: wins 6/7 categories
Metropolitan Business School: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Sport Management
Amsterdam, The Netherlands
4.40
Read more reviews
166 reviews
×
Best programme: Communication Sciences
Best programme: B.Sc. in Psychology
The Hague, The Netherlands
3.70
Read more reviews
3 reviews
×
Best programme: Business Administration
London, The United Kingdom
4.80
Read more reviews
20 reviews
×
Best programme: Undergraduate Foundation Programme
Amsterdam, The Netherlands
5.00
Top
Read more reviews
1 reviews
×
Best programme: Event Management and Hospitality
Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Category ratings
Facilities
4.43
4.27
3.77
3.67
4.44
5.00
Win
Not rated
Location
4.00
4.59
3.92
3.00
4.74
5.00
Win
Not rated
Professors
4.71
4.11
4.13
3.00
4.75
5.00
Win
Not rated
Internationality
4.71
4.49
4.27
3.33
4.60
5.00
Win
Not rated
Student life
4.29
4.07
3.98
3.33
4.56
5.00
Win
Not rated
Value
4.79
4.07
4.19
3.33
4.50
5.00
Win
Not rated
Accommodation
4.21
2.96
3.13
3.00
4.32
Win
3.00
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Specialized sports management content and expert professors
  • +Valuable industry connections and networking opportunities
  • +Welcoming atmosphere and excellent staff support
  • +Approachable and supportive professors
  • +Well-designed, up-to-date curriculum and academic programs
  • +Good student support and facilities
  • +Strong theory-practice balance and real-world application
  • +High-quality, challenging, and expert-led education
  • +Diverse community and international opportunities
  • +Strong hospitality and business programs
  • +Opportunities for personal and professional development
  • +Diverse and inclusive community
  • +Supportive and knowledgeable faculty
  • +Excellent facilities and convenient location
  • +Strong academic and personal development support
  • +Industry-relevant teaching and hands-on experience
  • +Excellent facilities and opportunities
  • +Strong friendships formed

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Poor quality of instruction and unengaging student discussions.
  • -Ineffective project management and lack of professional experience among peers.
  • -Lack of student support and care.
  • -Poor program value and teaching effectiveness.
  • -Administrative and communication issues.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
  • -Facilities are frequently described as outdated and in poor condition.
  • -Communication and course organization are often cited as lacking.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration and confusion.
  • -Lack of support and flexibility during personal emergencies is a significant problem.
  • -Inconsistent policies and unfair treatment are prevalent concerns.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor upkeep frustrate students.
  • -Lack of resources and inadequate support services are common complaints.
  • -Administrative and management issues, including poor communication and lack of support.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment that hinder learning.
  • -Lack of practical application and relevance in coursework.

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

Across several key areas, the institution receives commendable ratings. Its strongest performances are noted in Value and Internationality, both achieving near-perfect scores. Professors also garnered exceptionally high marks. The weakest area is Location, which, while still positive, is rated lower than other aspects. Student Life, Accomodation, and Facilities all fall within a strong middle range.

A mixed performance is evident across the surveyed categories. The university excels in **Location** (4.59) and **Internationality** (4.49), with **Facilities** (4.27) also receiving high marks. **Professors** (4.11) and **Student Life** (4.07) are rated favorably, as is **Value** (4.07). However, **Accomodation** stands out as a significantly weaker area, scoring considerably lower than other aspects.

This institution received its highest marks for Internationality, closely followed by Value and Professors. Student Life also scored well. Conversely, Accomodation emerged as the weakest area, with Facilities also rating lower than other aspects. Location sits in the mid-range of these assessments.

The university presents a mixed but generally positive review. Facilities stand out as its strongest area, earning a notable 3.67. Areas like Professors, Location, and Accommodation received a solid 3. Conversely, Student Life, Internationality, and Value all scored a comparable 3.33. While facilities are a definite highlight, teaching quality and on-campus experience appear to be areas for potential improvement.

Overall, the university garners strong ratings across various aspects. Professors are exceptionally well-regarded, achieving the highest score. Location and Internationality also stand out with excellent marks. Student Life, Facilities, and Value also reflect positive sentiment. Accommodation, while still strong, receives the lowest rating among the surveyed categories.

With exceptional scores in nearly every aspect, this institution shines brightly. Areas of strength are overwhelmingly positive, with perfect ratings for Facilities, Professors, Location, Student Life, Internationality, and Value. The primary area for potential improvement lies in Accomodation, which received a more moderate score.

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

University students largely praise the insightful sports management content, quality professors, and valuable networking opportunities, with a ~96% positive sentiment. A small fraction of feedback (~4%) mentions issues with academic support variability or program depth.

~96% of 179 reviews are positive, highlighting good quality education, approachable professors, and improving courses. A small fraction of feedback mentions issues with program value and student support.

~88% of reviews are highly positive, praising the quality of education, practical application, and international environment. No negative feedback was received.

About 67% of reviews are positive, highlighting strong personal development and professional industry insights. The remaining 33% of feedback mentions issues with fairness and accountability.

University reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with ~100% of 20 feedback entries rating 4–5 stars. Students praise friendly, supportive teachers, excellent facilities like the library, and effective student support services that build confidence.

The single review is overwhelmingly positive, with a 5/5 average rating. This feedback highlights first-class teaching, facilities, and opportunities, with modules taught by industry leaders providing real-life experience.

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
85%
32%
38%
67%
75%
100%
0%
4★
15%
61%
50%
0%
25%
0%
0%
3★
4%
11%
12%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
2%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
4%
2%
0%
33%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
A life-changing experience in Sports Industry

A perfect synergy between theoretical knowledge, practical application, and high-quality networking. After completing the Master in Sport Management at Johan Cruyff Institute, I took a major step forward in my career in the sports industry. What truly sets this institution apart is the closeness and support of the professors and staff, as well as the enriching experiences shared with fellow students. Without a doubt, it has been one of the most transformative decisions of my life.

Pretty good but competitive

The costs for EU students are ok. Housing is still crazy and you are lucky if you get assistance with that, but when you do, it's very good for the money. The classes are a bit big but we manage. I feel the curriculum is complete and up to date and theres nothing missing from my education

:)

As a computer science student at the Vrije Universitet in Amsterdam, I have been thoroughly impressed with the quality of education and the level of expertise of the professors at this esteemed institution. The faculty members are passionate about their subjects and are always willing to provide guidance and support to students. The curriculum is rigorous, and the coursework is designed to challenge students and prepare them for the ever-evolving world of technology. The courses cover a broad range of topics, from programming languages and algorithms to artificial intelligence and machine learning. The faculty also encourages students to take part in research projects and internships, providing valuable opportunities to apply what we have learned in the classroom to real-world scenarios. The campus facilities are excellent, with state-of-the-art labs and equipment available for students to use. The university's location in Amsterdam also offers plenty of opportunities for students to engage in cultural and recreational activities outside of their studies. One of the things that stand out to me is the diverse student body. Being exposed to different perspectives and backgrounds has enriched my learning experience and expanded my understanding of computer science as a field. Overall, I would highly recommend the Vrije Universitet to any computer science student looking for a challenging and rewarding academic experience, excellent faculty, and a diverse and inclusive community.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close