Eastern Washington University-EWU vs University Fan Noli of Korce vs Taraba State polytechnic Suntai Jalingo Campus - Tsp vs International College of Business and Technology - ICBT vs Taraba State University - TSU

Side-by-side comparison from 27 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
Eastern Washington University-EWU: wins 0/4 categories
University Fan Noli of Korce: wins 0/4 categories
Taraba State polytechnic Suntai Jalingo Campus - Tsp: wins 0/4 categories
International College of Business and Technology - ICBT: wins 0/4 categories
Taraba State University - TSU: wins 0/4 categories
Federal University Wukari - FUW: wins 0/4 categories
University of Southern Philippines Foundation - USPF: wins 4/4 categories
Comparing
Cheney, Washington, United States
5.00
Read more reviews
1 reviews
×
Best programme: Visual Communication Design
Best programme: Accounting and Finance
Best programme: Accounting
Best programme: BA Political Science
Best programme: Computer Science
Best programme: Bachelor of Tourism Management
Category ratings
Facilities
4.00
4.00
Not rated
4.00
3.83
3.89
4.00
Location
5.00
3.00
Not rated
4.38
3.75
3.63
5.00
Professors
5.00
4.50
Not rated
4.63
4.17
4.33
5.00
Internationality
4.00
3.50
Not rated
4.25
3.67
3.78
5.00
Win
Student life
3.00
3.50
Not rated
4.63
3.60
3.78
5.00
Win
Value
4.00
3.00
Not rated
4.63
4.83
4.00
5.00
Win
Accommodation
4.00
3.50
Not rated
4.50
4.00
3.89
5.00
Win
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Industry-experienced instructors
  • +Convenient campus location
  • +Excellent academic staff and effective curriculum
  • +Good campus facilities and clean classrooms
  • +Strong career prospects

Nothing to show

  • +Excellent, dedicated lecturers and advanced teaching techniques
  • +Diverse course offerings and well-equipped facilities
  • +Positive student life and overall supportive campus environment
  • +Dedicated and supportive lecturers
  • +Conducive learning environment and facilities
  • +Academic knowledge and practical skill development
  • +Strong academic standards and supportive lecturers
  • +Emphasis on character development and discipline
  • +Positive campus environment and facilities
  • +Confidence building and positive environment
  • +Inclusive and accepting atmosphere
Cons
  • -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities are a recurring complaint.
  • -Inefficient administrative processes cause significant frustration.
  • -The curriculum feels outdated and lacks practical application.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources are a significant drawback.
  • -Poor communication and lack of student support are frequently mentioned concerns.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology hinder the learning experience.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support from faculty and staff is a recurring problem.
  • -Administrative and management issues disrupt student progress.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Communication gaps and lack of support create frustration.
  • -Administrative and management issues impact staff benefits and compensation.
  • -Issues related to employment conditions and benefits are a recurring concern.
  • -Ineffective communication and disorganized administrative processes cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources hinder the learning experience.
  • -The curriculum feels irrelevant and disconnected from real-world applications.
Rating summary
What students say

With exceptional scores in key areas, the institution excels in its **professors** and **location**, both receiving a perfect 5 out of 5. Facilities and accommodation are also well-regarded, rated 4. While internationality also scores a strong 4, student life emerges as a comparatively weaker area with a rating of 3. Overall value is considered good at 4.

With impressive scores in academic and campus resources, the university shines in its professor quality (4.5) and facilities (4). Student life, accommodation, internationality, and overall value are rated moderately at 3.5 and 3. The weakest aspect identified is its location, receiving a score of 3, suggesting it may not be ideal for all students.

Nothing to show

This institution receives high marks across the board. Notably, professors, student life, and value are exceptionally strong areas, each earning a rating of 4.625. Internationality and location also score well at 4.25 and 4.375, respectively. The weakest area, though still solid, is facilities, rated at 4.0.

This institution demonstrates a strong showing across multiple aspects. Its **value** stands out with an exceptional rating, alongside high marks for **professors** and **accommodation**. On the other hand, **student life** and **internationality** received the lowest scores, though still respectable. Facilities and location also fall within a solid mid-range performance.

Overall, this institution garners strong marks, with professors and value being standout areas. Facilities and accommodation also received positive feedback, alongside student life and internationality. The lowest-rated aspect, though still respectable, is location. The university demonstrates a solid, albeit not perfect, all-around performance.

Across a comprehensive review, the institution demonstrates exceptional strengths, with perfect scores awarded for Professors, Location, Student Life, Accommodation, Internationality, and Value. The sole area not receiving a top score is Facilities, which is rated a strong 4 out of 5. This indicates a generally outstanding university experience with only minor room for enhancement in its physical infrastructure.

Reviews summary
Highlights

With a perfect 5/5 average rating, this university has received one positive review. The reviewer highlighted accessible Visual Communication Design program classes and instructors with real industry experience. No negative feedback was provided.

With an average rating of 4/5, ~50% of reviews are positive, highlighting excellent academic staff and facilities. No negative feedback was recorded.

Nothing to show

With an average rating of 4.5/5, ~88% of reviews are positive. Students highlight excellent lecturers and flexible class timings, alongside well-equipped labs and facilities. No negative feedback was provided.

With an average rating of 4.17/5, ~83% of feedback is positive. Students praise the conducive learning environment, dedicated lecturers, and valuable academic/practical experiences. A small amount of feedback (~17%) suggests a need for improved equipment and more qualified teachers.

With an average rating of 4.22/5 from nine reviews, ~89% are positive, highlighting excellent lecturers, character development, and a sense of belonging. One ~11% review mentioned staff issues with pensions and salaries.

This university has a perfect rating of 5/5, with 100% of feedback being positive. Students appreciate how the school brings out their best, boosts confidence, and promotes gender equality.

Rating distribution
5★
100%
50%
0%
63%
33%
56%
100%
4★
0%
0%
0%
25%
50%
33%
0%
3★
0%
50%
0%
13%
17%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
11%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Bsc (Hons) in Nursing

I am a student of Bsc (Hons) Nursing 07th batch (Galle branch). I recommend ICBT Galle branch to start Nursing Bsc and this is the best place for it. They have very excellent lecturers and progress is also very consistent. I really appreciate the dedication of previous Coordinator Miss Kanchana Panditha (presently Miss Kanchana Panditha-Assistant Manager-Academic Administration). Undergraduate Department, ICBT Colombo Camp) . All the best

Good learning environment

The learning environment is conducive. good accommodation for students especially the female hostels, almost 24/7 electricity. secure environment. When it comes to academic performance I'd say they are average, The lecturers are sometimes not motivated to teach because of delay in their salaries but overall the university is good but could be better with better government,

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close