Sepuluh Nopember Institute of Technology vs Universitas PGRI Adi Buana Surabaya - Unipasby vs State University Of Surabaya - UNESA vs Dinamika University - Stikom Surabaya vs Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Komunikasi Almamater Wartawan Surabaya
Side-by-side comparison from 14 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Supportive faculty and enriching learning environment
- +Ample opportunities for personal development and activities
- +Conducive academic facilities and green campus surroundings
- +Engaging academic events with qualified speakers
- +Opportunities for practical experience and learning
- +Supportive and well-facilitated campus environment
- +Accessible education and personalized course guidance
- +Supportive environment with caring professors and engaging teaching methods
- +Opportunities for extracurricular activities and hands-on experience
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- +Knowledgeable and approachable lecturers.
- +Excellent facilities and learning environment.
- +Strong academic programs and practical exposure.
- +Excellent facilities and supportive mentors
- +Friendly student environment and fun atmosphere
- +Entrepreneurship focus across all programs
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
- -Lack of support and communication leaves students feeling neglected.
- -Outdated facilities and technology hinder learning.
- -Poor communication and lack of transparency from administration are frustrating.
- -Excessive workload and insufficient support lead to stress.
- -Outdated facilities and technology are a persistent problem.
- -Inefficient administrative processes create significant frustration.
- -Lack of clear communication and transparency is a recurring concern.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues, including poor communication and disorganization.
- -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources for students.
- -Lack of engaging teaching methods and ineffective curriculum.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
- -Facilities are outdated and in poor condition.
- -Course content is irrelevant and poorly delivered.
This institution garners excellent reviews across multiple aspects, with Internationality standing out as its strongest area, achieving a perfect score. Student Life and Value also received commendations with 4.5 ratings. Conversely, Facilities represent the lowest-rated category, though still solid at 4. This establishes a generally positive academic and social environment.
Across multiple metrics, this institution demonstrates outstanding strengths. Facilities, professors, student life, accommodation, and internationality all received perfect scores, indicating exceptional quality in these key areas. The university's location and its perceived value for money are also highly rated, though these areas show slightly less perfection than others. Overall, the university presents a very strong offering with only minor room for improvement.
With a robust average score, the university demonstrates particular strengths in **Student Life** (4.25) and **Location** (4). Ratings for **Accomodation**, **Internationality**, and **Professors** are also solid at 3.75. **Value** is well-regarded at 4. The **Facilities** category, while still decent, received the lowest score at 3.25.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
This institution garners exceptional scores in all evaluated aspects. Its facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, and internationality all received perfect marks. Likewise, the university offers outstanding value for its students. With a flawless 5/5 rating in every category, there are no discernible weak areas; the university excels uniformly across its offerings.
This institution garners excellent feedback, excelling with perfect scores in Facilities, Professors, Location, Accommodations, Internationality, and Value. Student Life, while still strong with a score of 4, represents the sole area not achieving a top rating. Overall, the university demonstrates widespread strengths with this one minor area for potential enhancement.
Four reviews show an average rating of 4.25/5. Students praise supportive lecturers, good academic facilities like the library, and various student activities. Some note minor facility issues such as classroom seating and paved roads.
With a 4/5 average rating, 100% of feedback is positive. Students highlight active campus events with highly qualified guests and provided food.
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~75%), highlighting excellent and accessible education, supportive professors, and engaging teaching methods. Students appreciate guidance in course selection and opportunities for deep engagement. Minimal negative feedback was noted.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
All three reviews are positive, resulting in a 5/5 average rating and ~0% negative feedback. Students highlight rewarding academic programs, knowledgeable and approachable lecturers, and excellent facilities. The university is also recognized for its strong ranking.
With a perfect 5/5 average rating, reviews highlight excellent facilities, a friendly student environment, and supportive mentors. The university's focus on entrepreneurship and innovation is also noted positively. No negative feedback was received.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show