University of Manila - UDM vs Pamantasan ng Lungsod ng Valenzuela - PLV vs Technological Institute of the Philippines - TIP vs De La Salle Lipa - DLSL vs Southville International School and Colleges

Side-by-side comparison from 21 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
University of Manila - UDM: wins 0/1 categories
Pamantasan ng Lungsod ng Valenzuela - PLV: wins 0/1 categories
Technological Institute of the Philippines - TIP: wins 0/1 categories
De La Salle Lipa - DLSL: wins 1/1 categories
Southville International School and Colleges: wins 0/1 categories
Colegio de San Juan de Letran - CSJL: wins 0/1 categories
Adamson University - ADU: wins 0/1 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Computer Application
Best programme: BS Information Technology
Best programme: Applied Computer Science
Manila, Philippines
5.00
Read more reviews
1 reviews
×
Best programme: Bachelor of Nursing
Best programme: Medical Laboratory Sciences
Best programme: Bachelor of Science in Business Administration (American Degree)
Manila, Philippines
4.50
Read more reviews
2 reviews
×
Best programme: Accounting and Management
Category ratings
Facilities
2.50
4.67
4.00
5.00
4.00
5.00
4.00
Location
2.00
5.00
3.56
5.00
2.00
4.50
4.00
Professors
4.00
4.33
3.89
5.00
Win
3.00
4.00
4.50
Internationality
2.50
4.00
3.33
5.00
5.00
3.50
4.00
Student life
2.50
5.00
3.67
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
Value
3.50
5.00
4.22
5.00
5.00
4.50
4.50
Accommodation
3.00
5.00
3.56
5.00
4.00
4.50
4.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Innovative and forward-thinking approach to student development
  • +Welcoming and supportive campus environment with accessible faculty
  • +Strong academic standards and scholarship opportunities
  • +Free tuition and social service contribution
  • +Supportive professors and manageable workload
  • +IT program specialization
  • +Strong engineering and architecture programs
  • +Good facilities and adaptive online learning
  • +Caring instructors and useful practical application
  • +Excellent nursing exam performance and faculty expertise
  • +Innovative and effective teaching methods
  • +Comprehensive learning resources
  • +Academic and extracurricular development
  • +Excellent facilities
  • +Supportive environment
  • +Supportive faculty and comprehensive programs
  • +High-end facilities and professional personnel
  • +Extracurricular activities and scholarships
  • +Strong academic programs and successful alumni
  • +Positive and supportive campus community
  • +Valued personal attributes like work ethic and values
Cons
  • -Lack of qualified professors and insufficient facilities.
  • -Overload of redundant subjects and lackluster programs.
  • -Minimal competitive program activities.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause constant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of necessary resources are a major problem.
  • -The curriculum and teaching methods are often perceived as irrelevant and unengaging.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning experiences.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support from staff is a recurring problem.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a significant source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are frequently criticized.
  • -Communication breakdowns and unresponsiveness are common complaints.
  • -Poor communication and administrative issues.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of resources.
  • -Inconsistent and unsupportive teaching.
  • -Administrative and management issues create confusion and frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology hinder learning experiences.
  • -Lack of practical application and unclear career relevance are common complaints.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology hinder learning experiences.
  • -The curriculum is perceived as irrelevant or poorly structured.
Rating summary
What students say

Analyzing the provided ratings reveals a university with distinct strengths and areas for improvement. Professors achieve a notably high score of 4, indicating excellent academic guidance. Conversely, the location and facilities are the weakest points, each scoring a low 2. Student life and internationality also receive moderate ratings of 2.5, while accommodation and value for money present a more favorable picture with scores of 3 and 3.5 respectively.

This institution excels in several key areas, with perfect scores for Location, Student Life, and Accommodation, alongside a top rating for Value. Facilities are also highly regarded at 4.67. The weakest area noted is Internationality, with a rating of 4, while Professors are rated slightly lower at 4.33. Overall, it presents a very positive picture with standout strengths.

This institution receives positive marks in several key areas, with **Value** standing out as its strongest point at 4.22. **Facilities** also garnered a high rating of 4.0. On the other hand, **Internationality** represents the weakest area, scoring 3.33. Other aspects like Professors, Student Life, and Accommodation fall within a moderate to good range, indicating a generally well-rounded experience.

Across all assessed aspects, this institution demonstrates outstanding performance. It achieved a perfect score of 5 in every category: Facilities, Professors, Location, Student Life, Accomodation, Internationality, and Value. Consequently, there are no identified weakest areas, as excellence is consistent throughout.

Overall, this institution scores highly, particularly excelling in **Student Life** and **Internationality**, both earning perfect marks. **Value** also received top ratings. Conversely, **Location** presents the weakest area with a score of 2. **Professors** received a solid but lower rating of 3. Other areas like **Facilities** and **Accomodation** are strong at 4.

This institution excels in several key areas, boasting perfect scores for its facilities and student life. Accommodation and location also receive high marks. The university's strongest areas are its student experience and physical resources. Conversely, internationality is its lowest-rated aspect, suggesting room for improvement in fostering a more diverse and global campus community. Overall, it presents a very positive picture with only one area falling below a 4.0 rating.

The university demonstrates particularly strong performance in student life, earning a perfect score. It also boasts excellent ratings for its professors and value for money. Facilities, location, accommodation, and internationality are all rated highly at a solid 4. While no areas received low marks, these latter categories represent the relative weakest points, though still indicating a positive experience.

Reviews summary
Highlights

Two out of three reviews are positive, highlighting innovation, a good learning environment, and competitive programs. One review expressed concerns about qualified professors and facilities.

With an average rating of 4.67/5, all three reviews are positive, highlighting tuition-free education and supportive professors. Students appreciate the social service component and balanced workloads, though some suggest expanding IT program specializations.

With an average rating of 4.56/5 from 9 reviews, ~89% of feedback is positive. Students highlight strong engineering programs and good facilities. A minority of reviews found the location crowded and some instructors less engaged.

With a 5/5 average rating, approximately 100% of feedback is positive. Students highlight strong faculty teaching and effective resources, particularly mentioning the nursing licensure exam performance.

With a perfect 5/5 average rating and 100% positive reviews, students highlight strong academics, vibrant extracurriculars, and excellent facilities. This single positive review suggests a nurturing environment for skill development and learning.

With an average rating of 5/5, university reviews are entirely positive. Students highlight supportive faculty, excellent facilities, and a broad range of academic programs. Extra-curricular activities and scholarships are also appreciated.

Both reviews are highly positive, with an average rating of 4.5/5. Students praise the university's successful graduates and strong academic programs, particularly in engineering. The campus atmosphere is described as clean, peaceful, and community-oriented.

Rating distribution
5★
0%
67%
67%
100%
100%
100%
50%
4★
67%
33%
22%
0%
0%
0%
50%
3★
0%
0%
11%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
33%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close