University of Santo Tomas Manila - UST vs Pamantasan ng Lungsod ng Valenzuela - PLV vs De La Salle - College of Saint Benilde - DSL-CSB vs Technological Institute of the Philippines - TIP vs STI Colleges

Side-by-side comparison from 53 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: De La Salle - College of Saint Benilde - DSL-CSB (5.00)
University of Santo Tomas Manila - UST: wins 0/4 categories
Pamantasan ng Lungsod ng Valenzuela - PLV: wins 1/4 categories
De La Salle - College of Saint Benilde - DSL-CSB: wins 2/4 categories
Technological Institute of the Philippines - TIP: wins 0/4 categories
STI Colleges: wins 1/4 categories
The National Teacher's College - NTC: wins 0/4 categories
San Beda University - SBU: wins 0/4 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Medicine and Surgery
Best programme: BS Information Technology
Best programme: BA International Studies
Best programme: Applied Computer Science
Alaminos, Philippines
4.40
Read more reviews
5 reviews
×
Best programme: Computer and Information Science
Best programme: Secondary Education
Manila, Philippines
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Category ratings
Facilities
4.11
4.67
5.00
Win
4.00
4.20
3.60
Not rated
Location
4.22
5.00
Win
4.00
3.56
4.60
3.80
Not rated
Professors
4.32
4.33
5.00
Win
3.89
4.80
4.00
Not rated
Internationality
4.29
4.00
4.00
3.33
4.60
Win
3.40
Not rated
Student life
4.50
5.00
4.00
3.67
5.00
3.80
Not rated
Value
4.32
5.00
5.00
4.22
4.60
4.00
Not rated
Accommodation
3.93
5.00
5.00
3.56
4.00
3.20
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Strong academic programs and updated curriculum
  • +Beautiful and expansive campus with vibrant community
  • +Emphasis on tradition and faith
  • +Free tuition and social service contribution
  • +Supportive professors and manageable workload
  • +IT program specialization
  • +Vibrant and inclusive community
  • +Exposure to diverse perspectives
  • +Distinctive and specialized courses
  • +Strong engineering and architecture programs
  • +Good facilities and adaptive online learning
  • +Caring instructors and useful practical application
  • +Inspiring faculty and practical skills development
  • +Supportive and inclusive community
  • +Engaging and enjoyable learning experiences
  • +High quality, world-class education at an affordable rate.
  • +Flexible online learning options with approachable professors.
  • +Supportive and inclusive environment with a concentrated study approach.

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources are a recurring problem.
  • -Poor communication and unclear expectations lead to student dissatisfaction.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause constant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of necessary resources are a major problem.
  • -The curriculum and teaching methods are often perceived as irrelevant and unengaging.
  • -Administrative and management issues create confusion and frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance detract from the learning environment.
  • -Lack of engagement and uninspired teaching methods bore students.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning experiences.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support from staff is a recurring problem.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a significant drawback.
  • -Unclear communication and a disorganized learning environment are frustrating.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are evident.
  • -Inconsistent enforcement of rules and staff behavior are frustrating.

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

This university scores well across most surveyed areas, with student life emerging as its strongest aspect. Professors and value also received high marks, reflecting positively on the academic experience and return on investment. Accommodation presents the lowest-rated category, suggesting potential areas for improvement. Location and internationality are also considered strengths, contributing to a well-rounded university experience.

This institution excels in several key areas, with perfect scores for Location, Student Life, and Accommodation, alongside a top rating for Value. Facilities are also highly regarded at 4.67. The weakest area noted is Internationality, with a rating of 4, while Professors are rated slightly lower at 4.33. Overall, it presents a very positive picture with standout strengths.

This institution garners outstanding scores in several key areas, notably achieving perfect marks for Facilities, Professors, and Accommodation. Student Life and Internationality are also well-regarded, receiving a solid 4 out of 5. Location is the sole category not reaching the highest tier, though it still scores favorably at 4. Overall, the university presents a compelling offering, particularly excelling in its academic and infrastructural provisions.

This institution receives positive marks in several key areas, with **Value** standing out as its strongest point at 4.22. **Facilities** also garnered a high rating of 4.0. On the other hand, **Internationality** represents the weakest area, scoring 3.33. Other aspects like Professors, Student Life, and Accommodation fall within a moderate to good range, indicating a generally well-rounded experience.

This institution demonstrates exceptional strengths in student life, receiving a perfect score. Professors are also highly regarded, with a near-perfect rating. Areas for potential improvement include accommodation, which scored a solid but lower 4.0, representing the weakest aspect. Overall, the university presents a robust offering across its facilities, location, internationality, and value.

This institution demonstrates notable strengths in **Professors** and **Value**, both scoring a perfect 4 out of 5. **Student Life** and **Location** also received solid marks at 3.8. Areas for potential improvement include **Accomodation**, which received the lowest rating at 3.2, and **Internationality** at 3.4, suggesting opportunities to enhance these aspects of the university experience.

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

With an average rating of 4.53/5, ~90%+ of reviews are positive, highlighting a beautiful campus, strong academic programs (medicine, education, arts, nursing, pharmacy), and supportive faculty. A few mention minor administrative improvements needed.

With an average rating of 4.67/5, all three reviews are positive, highlighting tuition-free education and supportive professors. Students appreciate the social service component and balanced workloads, though some suggest expanding IT program specializations.

With a 5/5 average rating, this university is highly praised for its vibrant, inclusive community and diverse student body. Students appreciate the enrichment gained from varied perspectives and endorse the institution for specialized, unconventional courses fostering personal growth.

With an average rating of 4.56/5 from 9 reviews, ~89% of feedback is positive. Students highlight strong engineering programs and good facilities. A minority of reviews found the location crowded and some instructors less engaged.

All 5 reviews are positive (100%), with an average rating of 4.4/5. Students praise teaching quality, supportive faculty, and practical skills for career success. They also appreciate facilities and a fun learning environment.

With ~80% positive feedback, students praise high-quality, affordable education, supportive faculty, and flexible learning. A smaller ~20% of reviews express concerns about administrative processes and event prioritization over student learning.

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
67%
67%
100%
67%
40%
20%
0%
4★
20%
33%
0%
22%
60%
60%
0%
3★
13%
0%
0%
11%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
20%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
Go Thomasian Tigers!

This is the main factor that pushed me to choose UST-FMS in the end. When you look at the number of passers vs. the non-passers for the boards, you’ll see that UST produces the most number of doctors (among the well-known schools). This fact continues to amaze me because it shows that UST-FMS is capable of turning an ordinary person to someone extraordinary after four years of training. Con # 1: Major adjustment for non-UST graduates. If you’re a social butterfly, then this wouldn’t be a con for you at all. But if you’re a bit socially-challenged like me, I think that one of the biggest obstacles in med school is finding friends. It takes effort and time especially if you’re surrounded by people who’ve known each other from undergrad. Being one out of the four UPCN students that enrolled in UST, it wasn’t very easy for me to adjust. Good thing I ended up in the same subsection with one of my former batchmates, which made the matter of making new friends less pressing. But do not let this can hinder you! In time, I was able to adjust and make new friends (thank God!). Pro # 2: Excellent Faculty. Majority of the faculty members really “do their thing”. Meaning, most of them are really good at what they teach. Though there are a few here and there, who left me unimpressed. Nonetheless, I can assure you that most of our lectures, lab sessions, and SGDs, are handled well; and you will really learn a lot especially from the really intellectual teachers. Most of the faculty members and staff are approachable, too! Matters can be brought out into the open and inquiries are entertained. One thing I really appreciated about the departments is that they promptly posted the answer key after each and every quiz/exam. What’s more is that when you disagree about a certain answer, you can approach the departments with a letter for clarification, and if you are able to provide evidence (usually from the reference textbooks) then they will change/ consider the answer. My favorite so far is our faculty for physiology because they really handle the subject well. Almost all the concepts are more or less retained because they have this course structure that encourages repetition for reinforcement. For instance, for one topic, we have one short quiz, one figure-review quiz, a lab session (depending on the topic), a long exam, and a shifting exam. Con # 2: Some Treat Us Like Children. We have this “attitude” component in our grade, which is more or less used to elicit good behavior. We get penalized for being absent (unexcused), for leaving the room dirty, and stuff like that. While I recognize that this comes with good intent from the faculty, I hate being treated like a child. The use of external reinforcement (grades) is too elementary for me. Aren’t we old enough to be trusted to have the maturity and innate drive to do the right things? Nonetheless, you’ll be surprised to see that even if you are already in grad school, some people just really don’t mature enough. There are students who still tend to be noisy during class, be ruthless and inconsiderate… you get the point. I just take refuge in this fact that some people really need this “attitude” thing to behave well. Pro # 3: Good Facilities. The first thing that struck me during my first week in med school was that each and every room in UST-FMS had projectors and Mac computers for the lectures! I can assure you that the state of the facilities in the school somehow compensates for the BIG tuition fee. As an example, let me point out that we have a Medical Informatics Center where you can do research work using TOUCH SCREEN computers! Like other schools, we also have a library, auditoriums, a classroom, some chairs… you get the point. We also have access to the other facilities of the whole university. And just to add, we have a good “outside” environment too!! Nothing beats walking along lover’s lane, breathing (somewhat) fresh air, and basking in that university feel. If there’s one complaint I have about our building, it’s that the med cafe is too small for the student population and the food is too expensive!!! But this is saved by the fact that Dapitan (the haven of cheap street food and canteens) is just a few steps away from UST. With only 40 or so pesos, you have a hearty meal of sisig/buttered chicken/adobo/name-it-you-got-it. Haha. You just really need to look for the “safe” carinderias which serve clean food. Con # 3: Student Population. Our batch is composed of 500+ individuals which is a tad bit too many for me. Although the classrooms are able to accommodate us all, I think that 100+ students under one wing are too much. There are a select-few classrooms that I find “unconducive” for learning, because of its size and layout. But generally, it’s A-Ok. It just sometimes bothers me that we are so many. I think that our batch, in particular, went a little over the limit of the number of students allowed. Not sure, though. So I guess if you learn well in a small class, and you find yourself unwilling/unable to adjust to a HUGE class, then UST isn’t the school for you. Pro and Con # 4: Pseudo-Traditional “Spoonfeeding” Curriculum. The general view about UST is that it has a traditional curriculum, focused more on the theoretical aspect with lectures and exams. This is mostly true because as compared to other med schools, we are really battered with consecutive quizzes and exams to evaluate our learning. But actually, it’s not wholly traditional! There is also a PBL aspect incorporated into the curriculum in the form of SGDs, lab conferences, and the SCOFYL (you’ll know what this is soon enough! And personally, I prefer this pseudo-traditional approach. I think that one needs to really understand the theories before applying them. The UST curriculum gives us that, as evidenced by the high board passing rate. I have heard that our graduates also do well in their clerkships/internships/ residencies. Another issue about the school’s curriculum is the spoon-feeding. I will not deny this. Coming from UP, I readily observed that UST definitely spoon-feeds in the sense that almost everything is prepared for us. Almost all departments are fond of giving hand-outs (which are very useful, if I may add). But really, other than this, you’re on your own. At the end of the day, it all boils down to how much a student is willing to take in and study. The only con I see with the curriculum is that it is somewhat conducive to the G.C. (aka grade conscious) culture. Which, in my opinion, shouldn’t be the case. Studying should be driven by learning and not solely by high grades. But that’s just me generalizing and being ideal. It all really depends on what kind of student you want to be! To be honest, I’m also guilty of being grade-hungry sometimes, but I really make a conscious effort not to. And because I’m sleeeeeeepy and out of ideas, I’ll just leave this post at this point and add to the list in the following days. I hope that this little guide helps you come up with the best decision! Just always remember that med school should fit you perfectly like a velvet glove. Go to a school that you know you will love, because when things got tough (academically), having a good school environment and school pride will be one of the major factors that will push you to finish med.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

A good example

In this university i found peace , friends and the quality education , its not only lectures but they make sure that the students are enjoying while learning . They will mold you into a quality employee or a future boss of your desired business , and that's what i love from them .

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close