IÉSEG School of Management vs emlyon business school vs GEM Alpine Business School vs Audencia Business School vs ESSCA School of Management
Side-by-side comparison from 389 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Engaging and practical learning experiences
- +Strong international community and global opportunities
- +Supportive professors and active student associations
- +Practical, international focus and diverse student body.
- +Strong career support and professional experience opportunities.
- +Diverse program options and personal project development.
- +Diverse faculty and global insights
- +Innovative and relevant curriculum with real-world application
- +Strong networking and international opportunities
- +Excellent professors, classes, and facilities.
- +Diverse international student community and cultural immersion.
- +Well-structured programs and ample opportunities for professional development and city exploration.
- +Practical, experiential learning with real-world application.
- +Strong international focus, diversity, and global opportunities.
- +Supportive faculty and high-quality teaching.
- +Culturally diverse environment and international campus access
- +Supportive and organized academic environment with helpful instructors
- +Opportunities for career advancement and independent learning
Nothing to show
- -Last-minute changes disrupt scheduling and planning.
- -Perceived lack of effort to improve classroom experience.
- -Concerns about course offerings and professor quality.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources hinder learning.
- -Poor communication and unclear expectations lead to dissatisfaction.
- -Outdated and insufficient facilities are a consistent problem.
- -Administrative and management issues lead to disorganization and frustration.
- -Poor communication from the institution causes confusion and unmet expectations.
- -Lack of practical training and outdated facilities.
- -Unresponsive professors and poor management.
- -Expensive tuition for irrelevant courses and unqualified instructors.
- -Lack of student motivation and engagement in academics.
- -Lack of extracurriculars and limited opportunities for lower-year students.
- -Poor campus environment and a perceived low academic standard.
Nothing to show
This university receives high marks across most categories, particularly excelling in **Internationality** (4.55). **Location** (4.29), **Student Life** (4.25), and **Value** (4.31) also demonstrate considerable strengths. Conversely, **Accomodation** (3.78) stands out as the weakest area among the assessed aspects, while **Facilities** (4.09) received a solid, yet comparatively lower, rating.
This institution demonstrates a generally positive standing, with its strongest areas being **Location** and **Internationality**, both scoring above 4.6. **Student Life** and **Value** also received high marks, around 4.3 and 4.49 respectively. The **Facilities** and **Professors** are rated well, in the low 4s. **Accomodation** appears to be the relatively weakest area, with a score of 4.
Across key metrics, this institution demonstrates a well-rounded performance. Student life stands out as a particularly strong area, closely followed by professors and overall value. Conversely, accommodation received the lowest rating, indicating room for improvement in this aspect of the student experience. The university also scores well in facilities, internationality, and location.
Regarding its overall assessment, the institution performs best in **Internationality** (4.29) and **Value** (4.16). Professors also receive a high mark (4.03). The weakest area identified is **Accomodation** (3.47), though Facilities also scored relatively lower (3.85). Student Life and Location received solid ratings in the mid-range.
This institution garners particularly high marks for Student Life, averaging over 4.16, with Location also scoring well at 4.08. Professors and Internationality are also rated positively at a solid 4.0. Conversely, Accomodation stands out as the weakest area, receiving a 3.25 rating, while Facilities and Value are mid-range.
With a strong emphasis on location and internationality, this university also scores very well for its professors and student life. Value for money is also a positive aspect. The weakest areas, while still respectable, are its facilities and accommodation.
Nothing to show
With a 4.38/5 average, ~99% of reviews are positive, praising interesting classes, international experiences, and practical preparation for work. A minimal 0.8% of feedback is negative, citing some course content and last-minute changes.
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~90% 4-5 stars) with an average rating of 4.53/5. Students praise the academic rigor, practical and international focus, and diverse student body.
With a 4.34/5 average rating from 50 reviews, ~90% are positive. Students praise the supportive environment, valuable faculty insights, and innovative, tech-aligned courses. Some highlight group work stress and limited exchange program admission.
With an average rating of 4.19/5, roughly 94% of reviews are positive, highlighting excellent classes, professors, and facilities. One negative review expressed disappointment with a lack of practical training and professor engagement.
Around 74% of reviews are positive, praising practical and international teaching, supportive staff, and a great environment. One review (around 8%) expressed dissatisfaction with course relevance and teaching quality.
With a 4.54/5 average rating, nearly all students praise Schiller for its culturally rich environment and global opportunities. A small portion of feedback (~7.7%) suggests the university may be better suited for those seeking a less demanding academic path.
Nothing to show
IÉSEG offers interactive teaching and international opportunities. I had the chance to go on an exchange to another country, which opened up new perspectives for me. The courses in Lille are stimulating, and the professors are very involved in our success.
Nothing to show
Very good program offering rich training in different sectors of the commerce sector. The establishment has good infrastructure. She offers us good working materials for our projects. The Grenoble campus is not the best in France, but still very good There is a gym, classes, well equipped, amphitheatres, quite large and a beautiful cafeteria, it's not great luxury, but it has everything you need In our program, especially my year, we are lucky to have very good teachers who listen and who train us in an excellent way. This school nevertheless lacks international students compared to the top 5 of École de France, a business
I have been quite satisfied by the quality of teaching at Audencia. The lecturers and professors are knowledgeable and place an emphasis on professionalism and leveraging culture in business dealings.
ESSCA School of Management is known for its international approach and diverse programs. In my opinion, many students appreciate its emphasis on experiential learning and the opportunities for international exposure through exchange programs and internships. However, some may find the workload demanding and challenging but that's the way it operates. Whether I recommend it would depend on your specific academic and career goals, as well as your preferences for learning style and environment. Likes/ Dislikes: *Essca provides enormous opportunities to improve and enhance your skill. *Diversified culture *Provides webinars and seminars across all the campuses. *Workload Management could be seen as an disadvantage. As sometimes, you may find it very challenging.
Schiller university is the best thing that can ever happen to anyone l will never regret the day l applied and l mostly love their campus in Germany it has nice aesthetics and obviously l love their culture
Nothing to show
