University of Belgrade vs Universidad Galileo - Galileo vs Washington State University - WSU vs Gomal University vs University of Nova Gorica
Side-by-side comparison from 180 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Balanced theory and practical application for industry readiness.
- +Supportive and accessible faculty and staff.
- +Diverse and high-quality academic programs.
- +Engaging curriculum with practical, real-world applications.
- +Knowledgeable faculty and supportive learning environment.
- +Flexibility and technology focus for working professionals.
- +Supportive and approachable community
- +Effective and helpful faculty teaching methods
- +Opportunities for personal and professional growth
- +Exceptional teaching quality and supportive, knowledgeable staff
- +Enhanced communication and language skills development
- +Positive and friendly learning environment fostering personal growth
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- +Exceptional and knowledgeable professors
- +Well-structured and equipped campus environment
- +Supportive and attentive faculty
- -Administrative and organizational issues are prevalent.
- -Professors lack motivation and student engagement.
- -Curriculum is often irrelevant, overwhelming, and outdated.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of resources hinder learning.
- -Poor communication and lack of support from staff are common complaints.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Facilities are often outdated and poorly maintained.
- -Lack of clear communication and support is a recurring problem.
- -Administrative & management issues
- -Disorganized student bodies & frequent campus closures
- -Lack of proper classes & curriculum adherence
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- -Poor communication and administrative issues.
- -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities.
- -Lack of resources and support for learning.
Among the evaluated aspects, location stands out as the strongest with an impressive rating of 4.61. Student life also scores highly at 4.34. Conversely, internationality presents the weakest area, receiving a rating of 3.22. Facilities and accommodation are mid-range at 3.69 and 3.58 respectively, while professors and value show solid performance around the 4.0 mark.
This institution receives excellent marks for its **location (5/5)** and **value (4.67/5)**, indicating significant strengths in these areas. Facilities are also well-regarded at **4/5**. Areas for potential improvement include student life and accommodation, both scoring **3.33/5**, and professors and internationality, which received a **3.67/5**.
Overall, this institution garners impressive reviews, particularly excelling in its **professors**, who received the highest rating. The **facilities** and **value** also scored very well. The area with the lowest, though still solid, rating was **internationality**. Other aspects like **location**, **student life**, and **accommodation** all contributed to a generally positive evaluation.
Student life stands out as a particularly strong point, receiving the highest rating. Conversely, accommodation appears to be the weakest area. Other categories, including facilities, professors, location, internationality, and value, received moderately positive scores, suggesting a well-rounded, though not uniformly exceptional, university experience.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
With exceptional scores in key areas, this institution shines in its **facilities, professors, and accommodation**, all receiving perfect marks. Student life is also a significant strength, rated at 4.5. While internationality scores well at 4 and value is good at 4, the **location stands out as the weakest area**, with a rating of 3.5, suggesting it may be less advantageous compared to other aspects of the university experience.
Nearly 74% of reviews are positive, highlighting balanced theory/practice, industry preparation, and exciting university life. A small percentage of negative feedback mentions outdated materials and disengaged professors.
With an average rating of 4/5 and 100% positive feedback, students highlight great learning experiences, knowledgeable faculty, and practical, technology-oriented programs. These reviews often praise the relevance of courses and flexibility in scheduling.
Nearly all reviews are positive (~100%), highlighting strong faculty support and approachable students. Students praise effective teaching methods and opportunities for personal and academic growth.
University reviews are largely positive (~74% of feedback), praising effective education and staff support. About 11% of feedback noted concerns about management and curriculum adherence.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive (100%), with an average rating of 5/5. Students highlight well-equipped campuses, structured classes, and particularly outstanding professors.
I am studying at the Medical Faculty of the University of Belgrade, majoring in Integrated Academic Studies in Medicine. What bothers people the most is what direction it is, how long the studies last and how long they study. My course lasts 6 years and after those 6 years it is calculated as if you have completed basic and master studies (6 0), hence the name of the integrated study in the name of the course. After completing 6 years, you acquire the right to the title of doctor of medicine, after which you can opt for further education or specialization that you want, but do not have to, you can work as a general practitioner. About 500 students enroll in my major each year, with all the list moves. In addition to my major, there are also basic academic studies of nursing, but also medicine in English, which is a more expensive variant of my major and costs 7000eur per year. At the medical school, non-budget students are a rarity, because if you give year after year, you are on a budget, because when you pass the conditional exams for the next year, you have fulfilled the right to budget funding. For self-financing students, the tuition fee is around 127,000 dinars. The faculty is not very organized and requires a lot of personal commitment. Professors are also doctors, so professorship is not their primary job, which is reflected in most cases in their lack of interest, but if you show interest, they are always ready to meet you and help as much as they can and know. In general, the concept of the faculty is different from the others, because it contains a lot of practical subjects, and attendance at all forms of teaching is mandatory, which can be exhausting, but it lasts. The first three years of study are the so-called preclinical years, where obstetric subjects are taught, which provide some fundamental knowledge and general principles of structure and function of the human body, but every year there is one clinical subject that requires work with patients in hospital. The next 3 years are clinical and the exercises are reduced to working in the hospital and learning the practical part. I would recommend to anyone who likes that vocation to enroll in my college, but not if they are not sure, because to the people who enroll, because they did not know what else or at the urging of someone else, the collapse will be a real torture. The faculty is located within the Clinical Center of Serbia, so it is well connected with all parts of the city. What is a problem is the distance to the nearest canteen. It takes about half an hour to get to the first canteen, which is usually not enough in the break between lectures for lunch. In addition to the educational part, the faculty also offers a handful of sports and entertainment activities, as well as its own cafe (which in my opinion is important). Parties, excursions, but also serious trips are often organized, as well as the famous Medicinijada, which is organized every year in Montenegro.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show