SRM University vs BJB College Bhubaneswar vs Indian Institute of Technology Madras vs WOMEN'S CHRISTIAN COLLEGE vs Sathyabama Institute of Science and Technology

Side-by-side comparison from 42 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
SRM University: wins 0/2 categories
BJB College Bhubaneswar: wins 0/2 categories
Indian Institute of Technology Madras: wins 0/2 categories
WOMEN'S CHRISTIAN COLLEGE: wins 0/2 categories
Sathyabama Institute of Science and Technology: wins 0/2 categories
Indian maritime University: wins 2/2 categories
Vels Institute of Science, Technology and Advanced Studies - VISTAS: wins 0/2 categories
Comparing
Chennai, India
4.30
Read more reviews
32 reviews
×
Best programme: Accounting and Finance
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Best programme: Data Science and Artificial Intelligence
Best programme: Visual Communication Design
Best programme: Bachelor of Software Engineering
Best programme: Logistics and Supply Chain Management
Category ratings
Facilities
3.88
Not rated
4.40
5.00
4.50
5.00
Not rated
Location
3.47
Not rated
4.80
5.00
4.50
5.00
Not rated
Professors
3.50
Not rated
4.80
5.00
4.50
5.00
Not rated
Internationality
3.50
Not rated
4.00
4.00
4.00
5.00
Win
Not rated
Student life
3.93
Not rated
4.40
5.00
4.50
5.00
Not rated
Value
3.88
Not rated
4.80
4.00
4.50
5.00
Win
Not rated
Accommodation
3.81
Not rated
3.80
5.00
5.00
5.00
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +High-quality education and helpful, experienced professors.
  • +Excellent exposure through diverse programs and industry-aligned curriculum.
  • +Strong focus on placements and practical learning experiences.

Nothing to show

  • +Excellent professors and engaging teaching
  • +Rigorous, industry-relevant curriculum and critical thinking focus
  • +Strong research opportunities and facilities
  • +Strong campus culture and student involvement
  • +Good brand recognition
  • +Strong academic programs and helpful teachers
  • +Excellent reputation for studies and placements
  • +Diverse course offerings in engineering and technology
  • +Comprehensive maritime training and industry exposure
  • +Strong foundational knowledge in core maritime subjects
  • +Practical preparation for real-world industry challenges

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Biased faculty and unfair grading practices.
  • -Poor campus life and lack of support for genuine talent.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are disappointing.
  • -Unresponsive staff and lack of support create difficulties.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor resource availability are major drawbacks.
  • -Instruction quality and course relevance are frequently criticized.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources are a significant drawback.
  • -Course content and teaching methods are often perceived as ineffective.
  • -Administrative and management issues create unnecessary confusion and delays.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology hinder learning and student experience.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support leaves students feeling unheard and unsupported.

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

This institution achieves strong performance, particularly in Student Life, with a rating of 3.93. Facilities and Value also score highly at 3.875. The university's Location, however, received the lowest rating at 3.47, alongside Professors and Internationality which both scored 3.5. Accommodations also received a solid rating of 3.81.

Nothing to show

Academic and location aspects of the university are exceptionally strong, with professors and location both receiving a near-perfect 4.8 rating. Student life and facilities are also well-regarded at 4.4. The weakest area is accommodation, scoring 3.8. Internationality scores a respectable 4, and value for money is also rated highly at 4.8.

This institution receives outstanding scores in several key areas, notably its facilities, professors, location, student life, and accommodation, all earning a perfect 5 out of 5. Areas for potential improvement lie in internationality and value, which are rated a solid 4 out of 5, indicating good but not exceptional standing.

The institution garners excellent marks in most areas, with accommodation standing out at a perfect 5. Facilities, professors, location, and student life all received a strong 4.5. Internationality is rated a solid 4, representing the only area below the highest tier. Overall, the university presents a highly positive picture with consistently high scores.

This institution garners outstanding reviews across every aspect. With perfect scores in facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value, there are no discernible weak areas. The university excels universally, indicating a consistently high-quality experience for its students in all surveyed dimensions.

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

University reviews are predominantly positive, with an average rating of 4.34/5. Students praise the quality of education, helpful faculty, and good environment. A small portion (~3%) expressed concerns about campus life and faculty bias.

Nothing to show

All 5 reviews are positive, giving an average rating of 4.8/5. Students praise professors, curriculum, and research facilities. Accommodation could be better, but this is a minor point.

This university receives overwhelmingly positive feedback (100%), with students highlighting campus life and brand recognition. There is no negative feedback provided.

With a 4.5/5 average rating from two reviews, ~100% of feedback is positive. Students highlight helpful teachers and strong academics.

Both reviews are highly positive, with an average rating of 5/5. Students describe the university as impactful and one of the best, highlighting strong foundational training and significant exposure to the maritime world.

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
56%
0%
80%
100%
50%
100%
0%
4★
28%
0%
20%
0%
50%
0%
0%
3★
13%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
3%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close