University of Nairobi vs The Catholic University of Eastern Africa vs Bridge College vs Africa Nazarene University vs Kabete National Polytechnic

Side-by-side comparison from 246 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Africa Nazarene University (4.70)
University of Nairobi: wins 0/7 categories
The Catholic University of Eastern Africa: wins 1/7 categories
Bridge College: wins 0/7 categories
Africa Nazarene University: wins 2/7 categories
Kabete National Polytechnic: wins 0/7 categories
Kaimosi Friends University - KAFU : wins 4/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Economics and Statistics
Best programme: Bachelor of Education Arts
Nairobi, Kenya
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Best programme: Bachelor of Education Arts
Best programme: Electrical and Electronics Engineering
Best programme: Bsc Information Technology
Category ratings
Facilities
4.09
3.95
Not rated
4.67
4.33
5.00
Win
Location
4.61
4.71
Win
Not rated
4.00
3.33
3.00
Professors
4.39
4.14
Not rated
4.33
4.00
5.00
Win
Internationality
4.18
4.19
Not rated
4.67
3.33
5.00
Win
Student life
4.21
4.05
Not rated
4.67
Win
3.33
4.00
Value
4.40
4.48
Not rated
4.67
Win
3.67
4.00
Accommodation
3.74
3.67
Not rated
4.67
2.33
5.00
Win
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +High academic prestige and diverse course offerings
  • +Convenient CBD location for networking and internships
  • +Dedicated and selfless faculty fostering critical thinking
  • +Supportive learning environment and approachable faculty
  • +High academic quality and relevant course material
  • +Beautiful campus and Christian-based values

Nothing to show

  • +Diverse programs, mission-driven academics, and faculty expertise.
  • +Ethical development and Christian values integration.
  • +Culturally rich environment and international exposure.
  • +Skilled and professional teachers
  • +Good learning environment and practical education
  • +Strong infrastructure
  • +Strong IT and technology programs
  • +Knowledgeable professors and good facilities
  • +Interest in career and industry preparation
Cons
  • -Overcrowding and lack of conducive learning environment.
  • -Outdated facilities and need for infrastructure touch-up.
  • -Decline in educational quality, with too much emphasis on theory and lack of practical application.
  • -Poor communication and lack of support from faculty.
  • -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities and equipment.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment are a significant drawback.
  • -Poor communication and lack of support from staff are prevalent complaints.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of necessary resources are prevalent complaints.
  • -The quality of instruction and faculty engagement is often subpar.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are major drawbacks.
  • -Inconsistent and ineffective teaching quality is a recurring problem.
Rating summary
What students say

Analysis of the university's ratings reveals a generally positive performance across key areas. The strongest aspects are location, achieving a score of 4.61, closely followed by professors at 4.39 and value at 4.40. In contrast, accommodation presents the weakest area, with a rating of 3.74. Other categories like facilities, student life, and internationality fall within a solid mid-range.

Evaluations reveal a strong showing for this institution, particularly in location, which received the highest score. Internationality and value also scored highly, indicating positive perceptions in these areas. Conversely, accommodation presented the weakest rating among the surveyed aspects, suggesting room for improvement. Facilities and student life received solid scores, falling comfortably within the upper range of the assessments. Professors were also rated favorably, reflecting a competent academic staff.

Nothing to show

This institution receives outstanding marks in several key areas, notably in facilities, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value, all scoring an impressive 4.67. Professors also earned a strong rating of 4.33. Location is the sole category with a slightly lower score, receiving a 4.

Offering a well-rounded student experience, this institution excels in its **Facilities**, receiving a strong rating of 4.33. Professors are also highly regarded at 4. In contrast, **Accommodation** is a notable area for improvement, scoring a 2.33. Other aspects like Location, Student Life, and Internationality fall within a moderate range. Value is rated at a respectable 3.67.

This institution garners excellent scores in several key areas, notably achieving perfect marks for its **facilities, professors, and accommodation**. Student life and overall value are also strong at 4 out of 5. Conversely, the **location** received the lowest rating, scoring a 3. Internationality is another area of strength, also rated at 5.

Reviews summary
Highlights

University reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~90%), highlighting academic prestige, excellent faculty, and career opportunities. A small percentage (~1.4%) of feedback mentions overcrowding and limited resources.

With a ~81% positive sentiment, students praise the supportive environment, knowledgeable faculty, and well-maintained facilities. Minimal negative feedback (~4.8%) noted issues with communication and infrastructure.

Nothing to show

With 100% positive feedback and an average rating of 4.67/5, reviews highlight strong program diversity, mission-driven academics, and a vibrant campus with international exposure. Students also appreciate the ethical and moral development offered, though one mentions the university is expensive.

Two out of three reviews are positive, highlighting a good learning environment and skilled teachers. One review, however, noted a lack of chairs and exam department issues.

This university receives strong positive feedback, with approximately 100% of reviews being favorable. Students highlight the IT program's solid foundation, knowledgeable professors, and well-equipped labs.

Rating distribution
5★
54%
52%
0%
67%
33%
0%
4★
37%
29%
0%
33%
33%
100%
3★
8%
14%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
1%
0%
0%
0%
33%
0%
1★
0%
5%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
Strong academic foundation

The University of Nairobi Medical School offers a rigorous and well-structured medical programme that truly prepares students for the realities of the healthcare world. One of the key strengths of the programme is the hands-on clinical exposure students receive from early on, thanks to its close integration with Kenyatta National Hospital and other major health facilities. The lecturers are highly experienced and passionate about teaching, and they push students to think critically and apply their knowledge. The curriculum is demanding, but it builds a solid foundation in both basic sciences and clinical practice. The environment is competitive, which motivates you to stay focused and disciplined. While the workload can be intense and resources sometimes limited, the overall experience is incredibly rewarding. I would highly recommend the University of Nairobi Medical School to anyone who is serious about becoming a competent and compassionate medical professional. It is a place where you are challenged to grow, both academically and personally.

Worst University Ever !!

As a first-year Bachelor of Science (Computer Science) student, I can confidently say this university is a complete disappointment. The lack of communication between lecturers and students is shocking—emails go unanswered, and there’s no support when issues arise. The infrastructure is falling apart—old, broken chairs that look like they belong in a primary school, dusty classrooms, and ancient computers that barely function (some seem to be from the early 2000s!). How are we supposed to learn modern computer science on relics? The online unit registration is a nightmare—it’s glitchy, unreliable, and has caused me to lose crucial units. Shockingly, even the fundamental computer science unit (the core of the degree!) was missing from allocations. The administration does nothing to fix these issues. Lecturers are unreliable—showing up late or not at all, with no makeup classes. The systems are always slow, and there are zero extracurricular activities, making campus life dull and isolating. Save your time and money—this place is a scam. If you actually care about your education, look elsewhere.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close