Universidad Politécnica Territorial De Los Altos Mirandinos - UPTAMCA vs University of Agriculture Faisalabad vs Government College University Faisalabad vs Government College Women University Faisalabad vs National Textile University

Side-by-side comparison from 36 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Faculty of Humanities of the University of Lisbon - FLUL (5.00)
Universidad Politécnica Territorial De Los Altos Mirandinos - UPTAMCA: wins 2/6 categories
University of Agriculture Faisalabad: wins 0/6 categories
Government College University Faisalabad: wins 0/6 categories
Government College Women University Faisalabad: wins 1/6 categories
National Textile University: wins 0/6 categories
Superior College: wins 0/6 categories
Faculty of Humanities of the University of Lisbon - FLUL: wins 3/6 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Occupational Health and Safety
Best programme: Agricultural Science
Best programme: Applied Statistics
Best programme: Chemistry
Faisalabad, Pakistan
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Faisalabad, Pakistan
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Best programme: Applied Languages
Category ratings
Facilities
4.60
Win
3.50
3.60
3.50
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
Location
4.85
4.40
4.10
4.50
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Win
Professors
4.83
Win
3.90
4.10
4.50
Not rated
Not rated
3.00
Internationality
1.78
4.00
3.20
4.50
Win
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
Student life
4.85
3.90
4.00
3.00
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Win
Value
4.05
4.20
4.20
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
Accommodation
2.25
3.80
3.60
3.50
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
Win
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Qualified and supportive teachers
  • +Quality professional development
  • +Valuable practical experience
  • +Supportive and cooperative faculty and staff
  • +Balanced academic rigor with practical application and hands-on learning
  • +Good facilities, including grounds, labs, and hostels, at affordable costs
  • +Engaging and supportive learning environment with knowledgeable and approachable faculty
  • +Affordable fees and excellent academic programs for future career prospects
  • +Beautiful campus, modern facilities, and vibrant extracurricular opportunities
  • +Empowerment and holistic development
  • +Supportive and understanding professors
  • +Focused and clean learning environment

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • +Diverse course selection and excellent library resources
  • +High-quality professors and positive peer interactions
Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues neglect several careers.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of attention to certain academic areas are problematic.
  • -Administrative and management issues caused frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment detracted from the learning experience.
  • -Lack of essential resources and support negatively impacted studies.
  • -Unhelpful administrative staff and unclear communication.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment.
  • -Lack of support for student well-being and mental health.
  • -Disorganized administration and unclear communication.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources.
  • -Ineffective teaching methods and unengaging curriculum.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Lack of support and engagement from instructors is a concern.
Rating summary
What students say

This institution excels in several key areas, particularly its location and student life, both rated at an impressive 4.85. Professors also receive outstanding scores (4.825). However, significant challenges are evident in accommodation and internationality, with ratings of 2.25 and 1.775 respectively. The university offers good value at 4.05 and solid facilities at 4.6.

Performance across various aspects reveals a positive university profile. The institution excels in its **Location**, boasting a high rating of 4.4. **Value** and **Internationality** also stand out with strong scores of 4.2 and 4 respectively. Conversely, **Facilities** represent the weakest area, receiving a rating of 3.5, while **Professors** and **Student Life** are rated a solid 3.9. **Accomodation** also scores well at 3.8.

Overall, this institution garners positive feedback, with its **location** and **value for money** standing out as exceptionally strong points. The teaching staff also receive high marks, reflecting positively on **professors**. Areas that could see improvement include **internationality**, which is rated lower than other aspects, and **facilities** and **accommodation**, which are considered average. Student life receives solid, mid-range scores.

This institution excels with particularly high marks in **Professors**, **Location**, and **Internationality**, all scoring an impressive 4.5. The **Value** for money is also strong at 4. Areas for potential improvement include **Student Life**, which received a rating of 3, and **Facilities** and **Accomodation**, both averaging 3.5.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This institution garners excellent marks, particularly excelling in **Location** and **Student Life**, both receiving a perfect score of 5. Its **Facilities**, **Accomodation**, **Internationality**, and **Value** are also highly rated at 4. The weakest area appears to be **Professors**, scoring a 3, though still within a generally positive range.

Reviews summary
Highlights

Approximately 70% of reviews are positive, highlighting good teachers and skill development. A smaller percentage of feedback mentions administrative issues and neglect of some programs. The average rating is 3.92/5.

Nine out of ten reviews are positive, with students highlighting cooperative professors and staff, good infrastructure, and a student-friendly environment. No negative feedback was recorded.

Nearly all (around 70%) of the 10 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4/5. Students highlight the supportive learning environment, knowledgeable and approachable faculty, and reasonable fees as key strengths.

With a 4.5/5 average rating, all feedback is positive. Reviews highlight empowerment, a focus on academics, and a clean, disciplined environment conducive to student success.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

The single review is overwhelmingly positive, rating 5/5. Students praised the class selection and library resources. Professors were a mixed experience (~50/50), but classmates were a highlight.

Rating distribution
5★
46%
30%
30%
50%
0%
0%
100%
4★
23%
60%
40%
50%
0%
0%
0%
3★
15%
10%
30%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
8%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
8%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close