Boise State University vs Centrale Lille vs University of Medical Sciences and Technology - UMST vs Sudan University for Science and Technology vs State Islamic Institute (IAIN) of Kediri

Side-by-side comparison from 18 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Boise State University (5.00)
Boise State University: wins 2/5 categories
Centrale Lille: wins 0/5 categories
University of Medical Sciences and Technology - UMST: wins 0/5 categories
Sudan University for Science and Technology: wins 0/5 categories
State Islamic Institute (IAIN) of Kediri: wins 3/5 categories
University of Khartoum - UofK: wins 0/5 categories
The National Ribat University - NRU: wins 0/5 categories
Comparing
Boise, Idaho, United States
5.00
Top
Read more reviews
1 reviews
×
Best programme: Applied Computer Science
Lille, France
3.00
Read more reviews
3 reviews
×
Best programme: Computer Science with Data Science
Best programme: Medicine and Surgery
Best programme: Architecture
Best programme: Natural Sciences
Best programme: Pharmacy
Category ratings
Facilities
5.00
Win
4.00
3.78
2.00
4.00
3.00
Not rated
Location
5.00
4.67
4.44
2.67
5.00
2.00
Not rated
Professors
3.00
3.67
3.78
2.67
5.00
Win
4.00
Not rated
Internationality
2.00
3.33
3.78
2.67
5.00
Win
2.00
Not rated
Student life
5.00
4.00
3.56
3.33
4.00
5.00
Not rated
Value
4.00
2.67
3.89
3.00
5.00
Win
4.00
Not rated
Accommodation
5.00
Win
4.00
3.63
2.00
4.00
3.00
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Engaging and experienced professors
  • +Active campus life with clubs and activities
  • +High-quality research & renowned professors
  • +Intellectually stimulating & fast-paced coursework
  • +International environment & global collaborations
  • +High-quality education and practical learning experiences
  • +Supportive and inspiring campus environment
  • +Strong faculty and well-structured academic programs
  • +Engaging lectures and active student community
  • +Extensive social events and party scene
  • +Accessible educational support
  • +Comprehensive and diverse study programs
  • +Good facilities
  • +Academic and social growth opportunities
  • +Comprehensive and relevant course content
  • +Diverse and engaging community

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources are a significant drawback.
  • -Course content is often irrelevant or poorly delivered.
  • -Lack of value and misleading program quality.
  • -Administrative and management issues make the university experience difficult and unresponsive to student needs.
  • -The course content and assessments lack depth and thoroughness, leaving students feeling unprepared.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Lack of communication and support from staff is a recurring problem.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology hinder the learning experience.
  • -Overcrowded classes and lack of individual attention are prevalent concerns.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources hinder learning.
  • -Inconsistent teaching quality and unsupportive instructors are prevalent complaints.

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

Exceptional strengths are evident in its **Facilities**, **Location**, **Student Life**, and **Accomodation**, all receiving perfect scores. Conversely, **Internationality** stands out as the weakest area with a score of 2. The university also garners a solid 4 for **Value** and a respectable 3 for its **Professors**.

The university garners particularly high marks for its location, with a rating of 4.67, and solid scores across facilities, student life, and accommodation, all at a 4.0. However, value stands out as the weakest area, scoring a considerably lower 2.67. Internationality also received a more moderate rating of 3.33.

This university demonstrates strong performance in its **Location**, which received the highest rating. **Student Life** emerged as the weakest area, scoring lowest among the evaluated aspects. Other categories like Facilities, Professors, Internationality, and Value received solid, mid-range scores, indicating a generally well-rounded experience with a standout location. Accommodations also scored reasonably well.

This institution received its highest marks for student life, boasting a rating of 3.33. Other areas, such as location and internationality, also performed reasonably well with scores of 2.67. Conversely, the university's weakest areas were facilities and accommodation, both receiving a rating of 2. The value proposition for students was rated at a solid 3.

This institution achieves excellent marks across several key aspects, notably receiving perfect scores for Professors, Location, and Value. Internationality also stands out with a top rating. While Facilities, Student Life, and Accommodation are strong with a score of 4, these represent the areas with the most room for minor improvement compared to the otherwise outstanding performance.

This institution demonstrates a mixed performance across key areas. It excels significantly in Student Life, achieving a perfect score. Conversely, Location and Internationality are identified as its weakest aspects, both receiving low marks. Other categories like Facilities and Accommodation are rated moderately, while Professors and Value are strong points.

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

With a perfect 5/5 average rating, this university receives overwhelmingly positive reviews. Students highlight strong CS professors and a vibrant campus with many activities. Racial diversity is noted as low.

With a 3/5 average rating from three reviews, sentiment is mixed. One positive review highlights an international environment and quality research, while one negative review strongly advises against specific programs. Approximately 33% of feedback is negative.

~78% of reviews are positive, highlighting academic excellence, practical learning, and a supportive environment. ~22% of feedback mentions issues with unfocused courses and administrative challenges.

With a 3.33/5 average, ~33% of feedback is positive. One reviewer found education good but mentioned varying doctor quality, long lectures, and many parties. No negative reviews were provided.

With a 4/5 average rating, the sole review highlights good facilities and comprehensive study programs. A minor drawback mentioned is the scattered building layout, causing student fatigue. Negative feedback is minimal.

With a 4/5 average rating, this university receives largely positive feedback. Students highlight academic growth, diverse course offerings, and a rich social experience within a diverse community. No negative reviews were submitted.

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
100%
0%
56%
0%
0%
0%
0%
4★
0%
33%
22%
33%
100%
100%
0%
3★
0%
33%
0%
67%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
33%
22%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close