Pamantasan ng Lungsod ng Valenzuela - PLV vs De La Salle - College of Saint Benilde - DSL-CSB vs Centro Escolar University - CEU vs Technological Institute of the Philippines - TIP vs National University - NU
Side-by-side comparison from 38 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Free tuition and social service contribution
- +Supportive professors and manageable workload
- +IT program specialization
- +Vibrant and inclusive community
- +Exposure to diverse perspectives
- +Distinctive and specialized courses
- +Welcoming atmosphere and approachable faculty
- +Opportunities for skill development and extracurriculars
- +Well-equipped facilities for science and practical learning
- +Strong engineering and architecture programs
- +Good facilities and adaptive online learning
- +Caring instructors and useful practical application
- +High-quality education and supportive professors
- +Financial aid options and focus on student well-being
- +Academic and extracurricular support
- +Welcoming and diverse community
- +Supportive and professional faculty
- +Inspiring and refreshing campus environment
- +Inspiring faculty and practical skills development
- +Supportive and inclusive community
- +Engaging and enjoyable learning experiences
- -Administrative and management issues cause constant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of necessary resources are a major problem.
- -The curriculum and teaching methods are often perceived as irrelevant and unengaging.
- -Administrative and management issues create confusion and frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance detract from the learning environment.
- -Lack of engagement and uninspired teaching methods bore students.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning experiences.
- -Overcrowding and large class sizes reduce individual attention.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning experiences.
- -Lack of clear communication and support from staff is a recurring problem.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources negatively impact the learning environment.
- -Poor communication and a lack of student support are major concerns.
- -Administrative & management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources hinder the learning experience.
- -Inconsistent teaching quality and lack of engagement from instructors are disappointing.
- -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a significant drawback.
- -Unclear communication and a disorganized learning environment are frustrating.
This institution excels in several key areas, with perfect scores for Location, Student Life, and Accommodation, alongside a top rating for Value. Facilities are also highly regarded at 4.67. The weakest area noted is Internationality, with a rating of 4, while Professors are rated slightly lower at 4.33. Overall, it presents a very positive picture with standout strengths.
This institution garners outstanding scores in several key areas, notably achieving perfect marks for Facilities, Professors, and Accommodation. Student Life and Internationality are also well-regarded, receiving a solid 4 out of 5. Location is the sole category not reaching the highest tier, though it still scores favorably at 4. Overall, the university presents a compelling offering, particularly excelling in its academic and infrastructural provisions.
This institution garners exceptional ratings across several key areas, particularly excelling in **Location** and **Accomodation**, both achieving a perfect 4.6. **Student Life** is also highly regarded at 4.4. The university demonstrates strong performance in **Facilities**, **Professors**, and **Internationality**, each scoring 4.2. While all metrics are positive, the ratings for **Facilities**, **Professors**, and **Internationality** represent the comparatively lower, though still good, scores within this otherwise excellent profile.
This institution receives positive marks in several key areas, with **Value** standing out as its strongest point at 4.22. **Facilities** also garnered a high rating of 4.0. On the other hand, **Internationality** represents the weakest area, scoring 3.33. Other aspects like Professors, Student Life, and Accommodation fall within a moderate to good range, indicating a generally well-rounded experience.
This university presents a mixed but generally positive picture. It excels in **Value**, receiving the highest rating, and also scores very well for **Location** and **Student Life**. Conversely, **Accomodation** stands out as its weakest area. Ratings for **Professors** and **Internationality** are solid, while **Facilities** fall in the middle range.
The university shines brightest in student life, achieving a remarkable 4.73 rating. Location and value are also highly regarded at 4.5 and 4.58 respectively. On the other hand, internationality received the lowest score at 4.0, indicating room for improvement in this area. Facilities, professors, and accommodation all received solid marks between 4.4 and 4.45.
This institution demonstrates exceptional strengths in student life, receiving a perfect score. Professors are also highly regarded, with a near-perfect rating. Areas for potential improvement include accommodation, which scored a solid but lower 4.0, representing the weakest aspect. Overall, the university presents a robust offering across its facilities, location, internationality, and value.
With an average rating of 4.67/5, all three reviews are positive, highlighting tuition-free education and supportive professors. Students appreciate the social service component and balanced workloads, though some suggest expanding IT program specializations.
With a 5/5 average rating, this university is highly praised for its vibrant, inclusive community and diverse student body. Students appreciate the enrichment gained from varied perspectives and endorse the institution for specialized, unconventional courses fostering personal growth.
All 5 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.8/5. Recurring themes include a welcoming atmosphere, approachable and effective professors, and well-equipped facilities.
With an average rating of 4.56/5 from 9 reviews, ~89% of feedback is positive. Students highlight strong engineering programs and good facilities. A minority of reviews found the location crowded and some instructors less engaged.
With an average rating of 4/5 from 3 reviews, feedback is overwhelmingly positive (~67%). Students highlight quality education, supportive professors, and available scholarships. A minor point (~33%) noted issues with student accommodation during enrollment.
With a 4.33 average rating from 12 reviews, student feedback is overwhelmingly positive (~100%). Recurring themes highlight a welcoming and diverse community, expert faculty, and excellent facilities. Some students noted a lack of program-specific exploration, particularly in fieldwork.
All 5 reviews are positive (100%), with an average rating of 4.4/5. Students praise teaching quality, supportive faculty, and practical skills for career success. They also appreciate facilities and a fun learning environment.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
In this university i found peace , friends and the quality education , its not only lectures but they make sure that the students are enjoying while learning . They will mold you into a quality employee or a future boss of your desired business , and that's what i love from them .