Bina Nusantara University - UBN vs Muhammadiyah Jakarta University - UMJ vs Jakarta State Polytechnic vs Universitas Prof Dr Moestopo Beragama vs Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum Gayus Lumbuun

Side-by-side comparison from 18 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Universitas Prof Dr Moestopo Beragama (5.00)
Bina Nusantara University - UBN: wins 6/7 categories
Muhammadiyah Jakarta University - UMJ: wins 0/7 categories
Jakarta State Polytechnic: wins 0/7 categories
Universitas Prof Dr Moestopo Beragama: wins 1/7 categories
Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum Gayus Lumbuun: wins 0/7 categories
Politeknik APP Jakarta: wins 0/7 categories
Universitas Persada Indonesia Y.A.I: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Computer Science
Best programme: Mechanical Engineering
Best programme: International Relations
Jakarta, Indonesia
4.00
Read more reviews
1 reviews
×
Best programme: International Trade
Category ratings
Facilities
4.43
Win
Not rated
4.00
3.00
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
Location
4.15
Not rated
4.00
5.00
Win
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
Professors
4.64
Win
Not rated
3.50
4.00
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
Internationality
4.71
Win
Not rated
2.50
3.00
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
Student life
4.21
Win
Not rated
4.00
4.00
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
Value
4.57
Win
Not rated
3.00
4.00
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
Accommodation
4.38
Win
Not rated
3.00
3.00
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Diverse study programs and numerous student organizations
  • +Supportive lecturers and accommodating, modern facilities
  • +Opportunities for personal growth and peer connection

Nothing to show

  • +Knowledgeable and helpful lecturers
  • +Up-to-date practical learning experiences
  • +Improved campus facilities
  • +Interactive and comprehensible learning environment.

Nothing to show

  • +Balanced theory and practical application for workforce skills.
  • +Approachable and supportive lecturers offering teamwork and project opportunities.
  • +Strong career preparation in international trade and business.

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Inefficient administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning experiences.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support from faculty and staff is a problem.

Nothing to show

  • -Students dislike the administrative and management issues.
  • -They are unhappy with the outdated facilities and resources.
  • -Students find the course content and teaching methods ineffective.
  • -Disorganized and unhelpful administrative and management processes cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and inadequate resources hinder effective learning.
  • -Lack of clear communication and transparency from instructors and the institution is a persistent problem.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues create significant problems.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of resources hinder learning.
  • -Lack of instructor engagement and course structure disappoints students.

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

Across various evaluated aspects, this institution receives strong marks. Internationality stands out as the highest-rated area, followed closely by its professors and overall value. Accommodation and student life also score very well. The weakest performing category, though still positive, is location.

Nothing to show

This institution receives strong marks for its **Facilities** and **Location**, both rated a solid 4. **Student Life** also scores well at 4. Areas for improvement include **Internationality**, with a rating of 2.5, and **Accomodation**, at 3. Professors and the overall **Value** are rated moderately at 3.5 and 3, respectively.

This institution receives strong marks in several key areas. Its location is exceptionally rated at 5, and student life and professors both score well with a 4. Areas for improvement are facilities and accommodation, each receiving a 3, which represent the weakest aspects of the university's offering. Internationality also sits at a moderate 3.

Nothing to show

Across the board, this institution achieves commendable scores in all evaluated aspects. Facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and perceived value all stand at a strong 4 out of 5. The consistent high marks suggest a well-rounded and positive university experience with no single area significantly lagging behind others.

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

All 14 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.64/5. Students highlight engaging study programs, personal growth opportunities, and accommodating lecturers and facilities. Extracurriculars and modern campuses are also frequently praised.

Nothing to show

With a 3.5/5 average rating and ~50% positive feedback, reviews highlight helpful lecturers and well-equipped labs. Some mention improved campus facilities and learning quality. No negative feedback was recorded.

With a perfect 5/5 average rating, this university receives overwhelmingly positive feedback. Students highlight an eventful and immersive learning experience, with interactive and easy-to-comprehend lectures. No negative reviews were recorded.

Nothing to show

With a 4/5 average rating from one review, feedback is overwhelmingly positive. The student praised the program's blend of theory and practice, supportive lecturers, and career preparation. No negative feedback was recorded.

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
64%
0%
0%
100%
0%
0%
0%
4★
36%
0%
50%
0%
0%
100%
0%
3★
0%
0%
50%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close