Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology - JKUAT vs University of Eldoret vs The Catholic University of Eastern Africa vs Murang'a University of Technology vs Karatina University - Karu
Side-by-side comparison from 213 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Well-trained, professional lecturers and a good education system
- +Strong STEM, agriculture, business, and technology programs
- +Supportive environment for dedicated students
- +Supportive and devoted lecturers
- +Opportunities for innovation and career growth
- +Positive campus environment and diverse student body
- +Supportive and intellectually stimulating environment
- +Knowledgeable and approachable faculty
- +Relevant and tailored course material
- +Strong academics and dedicated lecturers
- +Vibrant campus life and sense of community
- +Quality IT and applied science programs
- +Supportive community and friendly staff
- +Engaging learning environment and dedicated professors
- +Good facilities and affordable living
- +Flexible and adaptable virtual learning options
- +International reach and diverse student/lecturer base
- +Commitment to inclusivity through scholarships
- +Strong IT and technology programs
- +Knowledgeable professors and good facilities
- +Interest in career and industry preparation
- -Lack of faculty support and guidance.
- -Theoretical coursework with limited practical application.
- -Administrative issues, such as project supervisor allocation delays.
- -Administrative & management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources are a significant drawback.
- -Course content is perceived as irrelevant or poorly delivered.
- -Lack of communication and support from lecturers.
- -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of necessary resources are prevalent concerns.
- -Communication breakdowns and unresponsiveness from staff create a negative experience.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a persistent problem.
- -Inefficient administrative processes and unhelpful staff cause frustration.
- -Limited course offerings and inflexible scheduling create barriers to learning.
- -Excessive and unclear administrative policies cause confusion and frustration.
- -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities negatively impact the learning environment.
- -A lack of adequate support and resources hinders student success.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are major drawbacks.
- -Inconsistent and ineffective teaching quality is a recurring problem.
Academic and social aspects of this university are highly regarded, with particular strengths noted in **Location** (4.46) and **Professors** (4.33). Student life and value for money also received impressive scores. The primary area for improvement seems to be **Accomodation**, which scored lowest at 3.69, though it remains a respectable rating.
This institution receives particularly high marks for its **location** (4.71) and **value** (4.67), indicating these are key strengths. **Student life** also scores well at 4.53. The **facilities** (4.41), **professors** (4.39), and **accommodation** (4.31) are all rated positively. The area with the lowest score, though still respectable, is **internationality** (4.28).
This university demonstrates a strong overall performance, with its location receiving the highest marks at 4.72. Internationality is also highly rated at 4.14, alongside professors at 4.09 and student life at 4.05. The weakest area appears to be accommodation, scoring 3.68, followed closely by facilities at 3.91.
With several strong points, this university garners high marks for its location, closely followed by its professors and student life. Accommodation and value also received solid scores. However, internationality is a noted area for improvement, as is the rating for facilities. Overall, it presents a mixed but generally positive picture, with a few distinct areas of excellence and some opportunities for growth.
This institution garners particularly high marks for its professors, reflecting a strong academic core. Student life and accommodation also receive positive feedback, indicating a supportive campus environment. While facilities and location are rated well, these areas represent the university's relative weakest points in the current assessment. Overall, the university demonstrates a commendable balance of strengths.
This institution presents a compelling profile, excelling in its prime location, vibrant student life, excellent accommodation options, strong international presence, and exceptional value, all receiving perfect scores. Conversely, its facilities represent the sole area for improvement, scoring a respectable but comparatively lower three. Professors are also highly regarded, earning a near-perfect 4.5.
This institution garners excellent scores in several key areas, notably achieving perfect marks for its **facilities, professors, and accommodation**. Student life and overall value are also strong at 4 out of 5. Conversely, the **location** received the lowest rating, scoring a 3. Internationality is another area of strength, also rated at 5.
With a 4.38 average rating from 148 reviews, ~98% of students are positive, citing strong academics, professional lecturers, and an enriching environment. A small minority of ~2% noted issues with faculty support and project supervision.
With an average rating of 4.78/5, approximately 100% of reviews are positive. Students praise brilliant, supportive lecturers and a great environment, though some mention limited resources like internet and computers, and the cold weather.
The university receives largely positive reviews (~77%), with students highlighting a supportive academic environment, knowledgeable faculty, and good facilities. A small fraction (~5%) of feedback points to issues with communication, infrastructure, and strict rules.
University reviews show high satisfaction, with ~100% positive feedback. Students highlight dedicated lecturers and solid academics. Some noted areas for improvement in facilities and results.
With ~87% positive feedback from 15 reviews, students highlight supportive staff, a conducive learning environment, and vibrant campus life. There is minimal negative feedback.
Both reviews are highly positive, averaging 5/5 stars. Students highlight the university's swift adaptability, particularly its successful transition to virtual studies during COVID-19, and its inclusive scholarship opportunities. The e-learning system is praised for its global reach and powerful teaching methods.
This university receives strong positive feedback, with approximately 100% of reviews being favorable. Students highlight the IT program's solid foundation, knowledgeable professors, and well-equipped labs.
Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology is one of the best universities in Kenya, as a personal opinion and one that is recommended nationally. I went there first because it was a few kilometres away from home and I wanted the experience of living alone and generally to feel like an adult. It was home away from home, that I even stayed one year later even after graduation. The lecturers were quite tough which was a good thing because I almost didn't graduate because I had missed a few classes. All my practical units that required extra coursework outside class always had the lecturers in attendance even when they didn't have to. My lecturers were very friendly and very practical on what the course I did would translate to once I finished. The security was very good especially for a single female young lady miles away from home. There was plenty of room to study, from parks all around the university, the student centre and the library. You could also easily access help from the administration and get to the staff offices for extra help from our lectures without going through loops. I loved it there and yes, I would recommend it to a family or friend, depending on the course they plan to do. I was an introvert in campus but I remember trying things like rollball, table tennis, pool, drama which are available and active even till date.
It is a good place to learn and fully explore your career. What I like is the commitment of the staff to make the school a better place. And what I dislike is the cold weather that makes school experience bad ,at times. I recommend that the school to have enough infrastructure for the well being of the students especially the lecture hall seats.
As a first-year Bachelor of Science (Computer Science) student, I can confidently say this university is a complete disappointment. The lack of communication between lecturers and students is shocking—emails go unanswered, and there’s no support when issues arise. The infrastructure is falling apart—old, broken chairs that look like they belong in a primary school, dusty classrooms, and ancient computers that barely function (some seem to be from the early 2000s!). How are we supposed to learn modern computer science on relics? The online unit registration is a nightmare—it’s glitchy, unreliable, and has caused me to lose crucial units. Shockingly, even the fundamental computer science unit (the core of the degree!) was missing from allocations. The administration does nothing to fix these issues. Lecturers are unreliable—showing up late or not at all, with no makeup classes. The systems are always slow, and there are zero extracurricular activities, making campus life dull and isolating. Save your time and money—this place is a scam. If you actually care about your education, look elsewhere.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show