Gunadarma University vs Muhammadiyah Jakarta University - UMJ vs Trisakti Insurance Business School - STMA TRISAKTI vs Krida Wacana Christian University vs Jayabaya University

Side-by-side comparison from 11 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Jayabaya University (5.00)
Gunadarma University: wins 4/6 categories
Muhammadiyah Jakarta University - UMJ: wins 0/6 categories
Trisakti Insurance Business School - STMA TRISAKTI: wins 0/6 categories
Krida Wacana Christian University: wins 0/6 categories
Jayabaya University: wins 2/6 categories
Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum Gayus Lumbuun: wins 0/6 categories
Universitas Persada Indonesia Y.A.I: wins 0/6 categories
Comparing
Jakarta, Indonesia
4.50
Read more reviews
6 reviews
×
Best programme: Applied Psychology
Best programme: Accounting
Jakarta, Indonesia
5.00
Top
Read more reviews
1 reviews
×
Best programme: Communication and Public Relations
Category ratings
Facilities
4.17
Not rated
4.00
3.00
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Location
4.50
Win
Not rated
4.00
4.00
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Professors
4.50
Not rated
4.33
4.00
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Internationality
4.00
Win
Not rated
3.67
3.00
3.00
Not rated
Not rated
Student life
4.17
Not rated
4.50
5.00
5.00
Not rated
Not rated
Value
4.50
Win
Not rated
4.00
4.00
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Accommodation
4.17
Win
Not rated
3.33
4.00
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Professional certification and practical learning opportunities
  • +Good facilities and helpful tutors
  • +Strong programs with skilled lecturers

Nothing to show

  • +Strong academic programs and knowledgeable lecturers
  • +Diverse range of programs and majors
  • +Good course material and practical applications

Nothing to show

  • +Practical application and project engagement
  • +Comprehensive curriculum coverage

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues cause constant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources hinder learning.
  • -A disconnect between curriculum and real-world application is a recurring complaint.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources are a problem.
  • -Communication from the institution is frequently poor.

Nothing to show

  • -Inconsistent and poor communication from administration.
  • -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities.
  • -Lack of adequate resources and support for academic and personal needs.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

Across various assessments, this institution demonstrates notable strengths. Its professors, location, and perceived value all received top marks at 4.5. Areas like facilities, student life, and accommodation also scored well, averaging around 4.17. Internationality, while still positive, was the lowest-rated aspect at 4.0. Overall, the university presents a robust offering with particular excellence in its academic staff, setting, and perceived worth.

Nothing to show

Student feedback paints a generally positive picture, with **Student Life** standing out as the strongest area at 4.5. **Professors** also receive high marks. The university's **Accomodation** is identified as the weakest point, with a rating of 3.33. Overall, **Facilities**, **Location**, and **Value** are consistently rated well, indicating a solid institutional offering.

Nothing to show

The university garners exceptionally strong scores in several key areas, with perfect ratings awarded for Facilities, Professors, and Student Life. Location and Accommodation are also positively rated at a 4 out of 5. Its weakest area appears to be Internationality, scoring a 3. Overall, the university presents a very positive picture, with a strong emphasis on the student experience and academic quality.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

All reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.5/5. Students praise program quality, campus facilities, and helpful staff. No negative feedback was recorded.

Nothing to show

All three reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.33/5. Students praise knowledgeable lecturers and well-balanced curricula. One reviewer noted minor issues with class registration and system functionality.

Nothing to show

This single review is highly positive, with an average rating of 5/5 stars. The feedback highlights Jayabaya's programs effectively combining theory with practical application, through projects and case studies.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
50%
0%
33%
0%
100%
0%
0%
4★
50%
0%
67%
0%
0%
0%
0%
3★
0%
0%
0%
100%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close