emlyon business school vs Mumbai University vs Shri Vile Parle Kelvani Mandal - SVKM vs upGrad vs Ecole Intuit Lab
Side-by-side comparison from 119 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Practical, international focus and diverse student body.
- +Strong career support and professional experience opportunities.
- +Diverse program options and personal project development.
- +Broad range of courses, including niche subjects.
- +Practical learning and real-world application.
- +Accessible education for diverse backgrounds.
- +Excellent faculty and well-designed curriculum
- +Opportunities for student growth and participation in activities
- +Focus on student welfare and comprehensive education
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- +World-class equipment and facilities
- +Diverse student body and networking opportunities
- +Encouraging and friendly faculty
- +Engaging and holistic learning experiences
- +Strong faculty and peer interactions
- +Industry-relevant curriculum and events
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources hinder learning.
- -Poor communication and unclear expectations lead to dissatisfaction.
- -Administrative inefficiency and lack of clear communication are significant problems.
- -Management and review processes for affiliated colleges are lacking.
- -The reality of the institution and its programs differs from its promotion.
- -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are consistently criticized.
- -Lack of engaging teaching methods and outdated curriculum are disliked.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues are a significant source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor upkeep are consistently criticized.
- -Lack of clear communication and support from staff is a recurring problem.
- -Students are frustrated with administrative and management issues.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of resources are a significant concern.
- -The curriculum is perceived as irrelevant and not preparing students for the real world.
This institution demonstrates a generally positive standing, with its strongest areas being **Location** and **Internationality**, both scoring above 4.6. **Student Life** and **Value** also received high marks, around 4.3 and 4.49 respectively. The **Facilities** and **Professors** are rated well, in the low 4s. **Accomodation** appears to be the relatively weakest area, with a score of 4.
An analysis of university ratings reveals strengths in **Location** (4.08) and **Value** (4.05), indicating positive student perceptions of these aspects. **Professors** (3.81) and **Student Life** (3.83) also received favorable scores. Areas for potential improvement include **Accomodation** (3.28) and **Internationality** (3.27), which scored the lowest among the surveyed categories. **Facilities** (3.54) fall in the middle range.
This institution garners excellent marks in several key areas, notably achieving perfect scores for its professors, location, and internationality. Student life and overall value are also highly regarded. Conversely, accommodation stands out as a weaker point, receiving a comparatively lower rating. Facilities are rated well but not exceptionally.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
This institution garners outstanding scores for its facilities, location, student life, and internationality, all receiving a perfect 5. Professors are also highly regarded with a score of 4, and the value proposition is strong at 4 as well. The primary area for improvement lies in accommodation, which received a lower rating of 3.
This institution excels in several key areas, with outstanding scores for location and student life, alongside a perfect rating for value. Professors also receive a commendable evaluation. Conversely, facilities and accommodation present significant weaknesses, both scoring a low 2. Internationality is identified as the sole area of concern, receiving the lowest possible rating.
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~90% 4-5 stars) with an average rating of 4.53/5. Students praise the academic rigor, practical and international focus, and diverse student body.
Approximately 74% of 64 university reviews are positive, highlighting a wide range of courses and strong academic foundations. A small percentage of feedback (~4.7%) noted administrative inefficiencies and curriculum concerns.
With an average rating of 4.5/5, these reviews highlight a positive student experience. The feedback praises excellent faculty, a strong curriculum, and supportive infrastructure, contributing to ~100% positive sentiment.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
With 1 review, the university has a 5/5 average rating. The single review is entirely positive, highlighting diverse student backgrounds and excellent facilities. There is no negative feedback to report.
With one review, the SIES MBA program received a perfect 5/5 rating. The student praised its enriching curriculum, faculty, and diverse peers, suggesting more industry-focused events would improve the experience. No negative feedback was recorded.
Nothing to show
The faculty and university is good. But, if you an't to take admission in french department then take admission only if you have a keen interest in literature and history. Because this department specialises in those domains. But, if you want to explore other practical applications of language such as linguistics and translation. In that case, considering other universities is a better option. Because literature is very heavy and everybody does not has the capacity to handle all of that.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
