Universitas Terbuka - UT vs Gunadarma University vs Tanri Abeng University - TAU vs Universitas Trilogi vs Krida Wacana Christian University

Side-by-side comparison from 30 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Jakarta State University (4.70)
Universitas Terbuka - UT: wins 0/7 categories
Gunadarma University: wins 0/7 categories
Tanri Abeng University - TAU: wins 0/7 categories
Universitas Trilogi: wins 0/7 categories
Krida Wacana Christian University: wins 1/7 categories
Jakarta State Polytechnic: wins 0/7 categories
Jakarta State University: wins 6/7 categories
Comparing
Jakarta, Indonesia
4.50
Read more reviews
18 reviews
×
Best programme: Management
Jakarta, Indonesia
4.50
Read more reviews
6 reviews
×
Best programme: Applied Psychology
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Jakarta, Indonesia
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Best programme: Mechanical Engineering
Jakarta, Indonesia
4.70
Top
Read more reviews
3 reviews
×
Best programme: Food Industry
Category ratings
Facilities
4.28
4.17
Not rated
Not rated
3.00
4.00
4.33
Win
Location
4.59
4.50
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
4.00
5.00
Win
Professors
4.17
4.50
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
3.50
5.00
Win
Internationality
4.17
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
3.00
2.50
4.67
Win
Student life
4.17
4.17
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Win
4.00
4.67
Value
4.39
4.50
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
3.00
4.67
Win
Accommodation
4.13
4.17
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
3.00
4.67
Win
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Flexible and accessible distance learning for working professionals.
  • +Well-structured academic programs with good quality materials.
  • +Supportive faculty and organized learning environment.
  • +Professional certification and practical learning opportunities
  • +Good facilities and helpful tutors
  • +Strong programs with skilled lecturers

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • +Knowledgeable and helpful lecturers
  • +Up-to-date practical learning experiences
  • +Improved campus facilities
  • +High-quality, career-ready graduates.
  • +Comprehensive, innovative, and practical academic programs.
  • +Excellent facilities and pleasant learning environment.
Cons
  • -Lack of effective communication and administrative issues.
  • -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources.
  • -Inconsistent teaching quality and curriculum relevance.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause constant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources hinder learning.
  • -A disconnect between curriculum and real-world application is a recurring complaint.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • -Students dislike the administrative and management issues.
  • -They are unhappy with the outdated facilities and resources.
  • -Students find the course content and teaching methods ineffective.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of necessary resources are significant drawbacks.
  • -The curriculum is often perceived as irrelevant or poorly structured.
Rating summary
What students say

With an exceptional score of 4.59, the university's **location** stands out as its strongest attribute. Other well-regarded areas include **facilities** (4.28) and **value** (4.39). The **accommodation** score, at 4.13, is slightly lower in comparison but still reflects a positive reception across most surveyed aspects of student experience.

Across various assessments, this institution demonstrates notable strengths. Its professors, location, and perceived value all received top marks at 4.5. Areas like facilities, student life, and accommodation also scored well, averaging around 4.17. Internationality, while still positive, was the lowest-rated aspect at 4.0. Overall, the university presents a robust offering with particular excellence in its academic staff, setting, and perceived worth.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This institution receives strong marks for its **Facilities** and **Location**, both rated a solid 4. **Student Life** also scores well at 4. Areas for improvement include **Internationality**, with a rating of 2.5, and **Accomodation**, at 3. Professors and the overall **Value** are rated moderately at 3.5 and 3, respectively.

This university demonstrates exceptional strength, with perfect scores for both its professors and location. Students also report highly positive experiences with student life, accommodation, internationality, and value. The facilities receive a solid rating, representing the only area below a 4.5, yet still indicating a strong overall offering.

Reviews summary
Highlights

With a 4.5/5 average rating and no negative feedback, students praise flexibility for working professionals and accessible, well-organized materials. ~94% of feedback is positive.

All reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.5/5. Students praise program quality, campus facilities, and helpful staff. No negative feedback was recorded.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

With a 3.5/5 average rating and ~50% positive feedback, reviews highlight helpful lecturers and well-equipped labs. Some mention improved campus facilities and learning quality. No negative feedback was recorded.

With an average rating of 4.67/5, the three reviews are entirely positive. Students highlight the university's role in preparing graduates for the workforce, comprehensive culinary arts curriculum, and good campus facilities and accessibility.

Rating distribution
5★
56%
50%
0%
0%
0%
0%
67%
4★
39%
50%
0%
0%
0%
50%
33%
3★
6%
0%
0%
0%
100%
50%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close