LSPR Communication & Business Institute - LSPR vs Universitas Terbuka - UT vs Yarsi University vs Pancasila University vs Krida Wacana Christian University

Side-by-side comparison from 29 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
LSPR Communication & Business Institute - LSPR: wins 0/3 categories
Universitas Terbuka - UT: wins 0/3 categories
Yarsi University: wins 3/3 categories
Pancasila University: wins 0/3 categories
Krida Wacana Christian University: wins 0/3 categories
Universitas MH Thamrin: wins 0/3 categories
Politeknik APP Jakarta: wins 0/3 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Advertising and Communication
Jakarta, Indonesia
4.50
Read more reviews
18 reviews
×
Best programme: Management
Jakarta, Indonesia
4.00
Read more reviews
1 reviews
×
Best programme: Law
Jakarta, Indonesia
5.00
Read more reviews
2 reviews
×
Best programme: Bachelor of Business
Jakarta, Indonesia
5.00
Read more reviews
2 reviews
×
Best programme: Hospital and Healthcare Management
Jakarta, Indonesia
4.00
Read more reviews
1 reviews
×
Best programme: International Trade
Category ratings
Facilities
4.25
4.28
5.00
Win
4.00
3.00
4.00
4.00
Location
4.75
4.59
5.00
5.00
4.00
4.00
4.00
Professors
4.75
4.17
5.00
4.50
4.00
5.00
4.00
Internationality
4.75
4.17
5.00
Win
3.50
3.00
3.50
4.00
Student life
4.00
4.17
5.00
4.50
5.00
4.50
4.00
Value
4.50
4.39
5.00
Win
4.50
4.00
4.50
4.00
Accommodation
4.00
4.13
5.00
4.50
4.00
5.00
4.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Convenient fixed schedules and central location
  • +Outstanding and supportive lecturers
  • +Valuable skills and practical learning opportunities
  • +Flexible and accessible distance learning for working professionals.
  • +Well-structured academic programs with good quality materials.
  • +Supportive faculty and organized learning environment.
  • +Cleanliness and modern facilities
  • +Kind, friendly staff and lecturers
  • +Integrated technology like CCTV and Wi-Fi
  • +Engaging and diverse teaching methods
  • +Inspiring and practical learning experiences
  • +Supportive and inspiring lecturers

Nothing to show

  • +Relevant programs and knowledgeable faculty
  • +Practical learning and industry partnerships
  • +Dynamic and critical idea exchange
  • +Balanced theory and practical application for workforce skills.
  • +Approachable and supportive lecturers offering teamwork and project opportunities.
  • +Strong career preparation in international trade and business.
Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues frustrate students.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology hinder learning.
  • -Lack of communication and unclear expectations cause confusion.
  • -Lack of effective communication and administrative issues.
  • -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources.
  • -Inconsistent teaching quality and curriculum relevance.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a significant source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources impede learning and comfort.
  • -Inconsistent course quality and teaching effectiveness are a common complaint.
  • -Frequent administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities negatively impact the learning environment.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support from staff is a recurring problem.

Nothing to show

  • -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder practical learning.
  • -Inconsistent and unclear communication from faculty and administration.
  • -Lack of career support and relevant industry connections.
  • -Administrative and management issues create significant problems.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of resources hinder learning.
  • -Lack of instructor engagement and course structure disappoints students.
Rating summary
What students say

This institution demonstrates notable strengths in its **Professors**, **Location**, and **Internationality**, all receiving a high rating of 4.75. **Student Life** and **Accommodation** are rated a solid 4, indicating a good overall experience. The **Value** proposition also scores well at 4.5. The **Facilities** category, while still positive at 4.25, represents the area with the lowest score.

With an exceptional score of 4.59, the university's **location** stands out as its strongest attribute. Other well-regarded areas include **facilities** (4.28) and **value** (4.39). The **accommodation** score, at 4.13, is slightly lower in comparison but still reflects a positive reception across most surveyed aspects of student experience.

This institution receives perfect scores across the board, indicating outstanding performance in all evaluated areas. Facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and perceived value are all rated at the highest possible level, presenting a uniformly excellent experience for students. There are no discernible weak areas based on these ratings.

With an excellent overall profile, the university shines particularly brightly in its **location and student life**, both receiving perfect and near-perfect scores respectively. Professors and accommodation also garnered strong marks. While the **internationality** rating is a moderate 3.5, indicating room for growth, the overall experience is highly positive, reflected in the consistent 4-4.5 star ratings across most aspects.

Nothing to show

This university garners excellent scores in several key areas. Notably, its **Professors** and **Accomodation** received perfect marks, indicating exceptional quality in teaching and living arrangements. **Student Life** and **Value** also scored very highly, suggesting a vibrant campus experience and good return on investment. The university's **Facilities** and **Location** are also well-regarded. The lowest rating was for **Internationality**, suggesting room for improvement in this aspect.

Across the board, this institution achieves commendable scores in all evaluated aspects. Facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and perceived value all stand at a strong 4 out of 5. The consistent high marks suggest a well-rounded and positive university experience with no single area significantly lagging behind others.

Reviews summary
Highlights

All four reviews are positive, highlighting convenient schedules for working students and excellent lecturers. The central Jakarta location is also frequently praised. No negative feedback was provided.

With a 4.5/5 average rating and no negative feedback, students praise flexibility for working professionals and accessible, well-organized materials. ~94% of feedback is positive.

With a 4/5 average rating from one review, Yarsi University is positively perceived as a good Muslim campus. The single review highlights cleanliness and modern facilities. Negative feedback is negligible.

Both reviews are positive, giving a perfect 5/5 average rating. Students highlight inspiring teaching methods, hybrid learning, and engaging lecturers. No negative feedback was provided.

Nothing to show

Both reviews are positive, with an average rating of 5/5. Students highlight a great and relevant campus with diverse programs, knowledgeable faculty, and excellent resources. Practical learning and industry partnerships are appreciated.

With a 4/5 average rating from one review, feedback is overwhelmingly positive. The student praised the program's blend of theory and practice, supportive lecturers, and career preparation. No negative feedback was recorded.

Rating distribution
5★
50%
56%
0%
100%
0%
100%
0%
4★
50%
39%
100%
0%
0%
0%
100%
3★
0%
6%
0%
0%
100%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close