Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora vs Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto vs Universidade Federal de Uberlândia vs Universidade Federal de Viçosa vs Universidade Federal dos Vales do Jequitinhonha e Mucuri

Side-by-side comparison from 3 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora: wins 1/4 categories
Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto: wins 0/4 categories
Universidade Federal de Uberlândia: wins 3/4 categories
Universidade Federal de Viçosa: wins 0/4 categories
Universidade Federal dos Vales do Jequitinhonha e Mucuri: wins 0/4 categories
Centro Universitário FIPMoc - Unifipmoc: wins 0/4 categories
Centro Universitário do Planalto de Araxá-UNIARAXÁ: wins 0/4 categories
Comparing
Best programme: School of Engineering/Technology
Best programme: Animal and Environmental Biology
Best programme: School of Engineering/Technology
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Category ratings
Facilities
2.00
3.00
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Location
5.00
4.00
5.00
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Professors
5.00
Win
4.00
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Internationality
3.00
2.00
4.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Student life
5.00
4.00
5.00
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Value
4.00
4.00
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Accommodation
3.00
3.00
4.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Strong curriculum and faculty
  • +Friendly student body
  • +Overall positive experience despite infrastructure issues
  • +Excellent faculty and academic reputation
  • +Good research and outreach programs
  • +Supportive and helpful professors
  • +Great learning environment

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues are frequent complaints.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment are a common source of dissatisfaction.
  • -Course content and delivery methods are often perceived as poor or irrelevant.
  • -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources are a major concern.
  • -Inconsistent teaching quality and lack of student support are frequently criticized.
  • -Administrative and management issues create unnecessary frustration.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning and comfort.
  • -Poor communication and lack of student support are common complaints.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

A mixed but generally positive evaluation emerges from these ratings. The university excels in its professors, location, and student life, all receiving perfect scores. However, its facilities stand out as a significant weakness, earning only two out of five. Accommodations and internationality are rated moderately, with value for money also performing well.

Overall, this institution demonstrates a solid performance, with notable strengths in its **Professors**, **Location**, **Student Life**, and **Value**, all receiving a high rating of 4. Conversely, **Internationality** stands out as a weaker area, scoring a 2. The **Facilities** and **Accomodation** are rated moderately at 3.

Overall, this university garners strong marks across several key areas. Its facilities and location are rated exceptionally high, alongside excellent student life. Areas of particular strength include these top-tier scores. Students also find good value and a welcoming international environment. Areas for potential improvement include professors and accommodation, which, while still strong, received slightly lower, yet still positive, ratings.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

With an average rating of 4/5, positive feedback (~100%) highlights a solid curriculum and friendly students. Limited negative feedback did not provide specific recurring themes.

This university receives overwhelmingly positive feedback, with ~100% of reviews being favorable. Students praise the faculty and research programs, though some mention uneven resource allocation and infrastructure issues.

With a 4/5 average rating, approximately 0% of feedback is negative. Students highlight positive learning opportunities and supportive professors, with one mentioning a large campus offering many possibilities.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
4★
100%
100%
100%
0%
0%
0%
0%
3★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close