Igbinedion University - IUO vs TED University vs SSM Institute of Engineering and Technology vs Ambrose Alli University - AAUE vs Universitas Sebelas April

Side-by-side comparison from 53 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
Igbinedion University - IUO: wins 0/5 categories
TED University: wins 2/5 categories
SSM Institute of Engineering and Technology: wins 0/5 categories
Ambrose Alli University - AAUE: wins 0/5 categories
Universitas Sebelas April: wins 0/5 categories
Collin College: wins 0/5 categories
Canadian University of Bangladesh: wins 3/5 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Accounting
Ankara, Turkey
5.00
Read more reviews
2 reviews
×
Best programme: Business and Administration
Best programme: Electrical and Electronics Engineering
Plano, Texas, United States
2.50
Read more reviews
2 reviews
×
Best programme: Animation and Videogame Design
Best programme: Marine Engineering
Category ratings
Facilities
3.82
3.50
Not rated
3.12
3.00
4.50
5.00
Win
Location
3.64
5.00
Not rated
2.94
3.00
3.50
5.00
Professors
4.18
5.00
Not rated
3.67
3.00
3.00
5.00
Internationality
3.91
4.00
Win
Not rated
3.39
2.00
3.00
3.00
Student life
4.30
4.50
Not rated
3.86
3.00
4.00
5.00
Win
Value
4.18
4.00
Not rated
3.75
3.00
3.00
5.00
Win
Accommodation
4.00
4.50
Win
Not rated
3.37
3.00
3.00
4.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Dedicated and knowledgeable lecturers
  • +Supportive campus environment and student well-being
  • +Focus on student development and value for money
  • +Diverse and English-taught programs with highly qualified professors
  • +Engaging extracurricular activities and clubs
  • +Well-maintained campus facilities and study spaces

Nothing to show

  • +Supportive and intelligent lecturers
  • +Disciplined and knowledge-focused environment
  • +Amazing campus life and student support

Nothing to show

  • +Knowledgeable and helpful professors
  • +Strong support for student success
  • +Practical and theoretical teaching methods
  • +Friendly faculty and supportive environment
Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are commonly criticized.
  • -Lack of effective communication and support is a recurring complaint.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources negatively impact the learning experience.
  • -Poor communication and lack of support are frequently cited complaints.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative inefficiencies and poor service delivery, including bribery.
  • -Insufficient funding for departments and lack of essential learning tools.
  • -Expensive transportation and numerous charges for school needs.

Nothing to show

  • -Repetitive and uncaring professors impact learning.
  • -Administrative and management issues are frequent frustrations.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of resources are significant problems.
  • -Course content and teaching quality are often criticized as inadequate.
Rating summary
What students say

Student life stands out as the university's strongest aspect, receiving a high rating of 4.3. Professors and value also scored very well, both at 4.18. Accommodation follows closely with a rating of 4. The weakest area, based on these scores, is the university's location, rated at 3.64. Facilities and internationality also received solid, though not exceptional, marks.

An overview of the university's ratings reveals an exceptional academic environment, with professors receiving a perfect score. Location also scores highly. Student life and accommodation are also considerable strengths, both rated at 4.5. The university performs well in internationality and value, but facilities stand out as the weakest area, with a rating of 3.5.

Nothing to show

This institution presents a varied picture based on its ratings. Student life emerges as the strongest area, indicating a vibrant campus experience. Conversely, location received the lowest score, suggesting potential drawbacks in accessibility or surroundings. Other categories like professors, value, and internationality all received solid mid-range scores, painting a generally positive but not exceptional portrait of the university.

Nothing to show

With a robust 4.5, facilities stand out as the university's strongest attribute. Student life also garners a positive 4. Conversely, professors and accommodation are areas for development, each receiving a rating of 3. Location and internationality are rated moderately at 3.5 and 3 respectively, with value also sitting at a 3.

This institution garners excellent marks, particularly in its facilities, professors, location, and student life, all receiving perfect scores. Its value for money is also highly rated at 5. Accommodation scores a commendable 4. The university's internationality, however, stands out as its weakest area, receiving a rating of 3.

Reviews summary
Highlights

With an average rating of 4.27/5 from 11 reviews, ~73% of feedback is positive. Students praise amazing lecturers, a focus on total development, and a positive campus life. No negative feedback was provided.

With 100% positive feedback and an average rating of 5/5, students highlight a diverse learning environment, knowledgeable professors, and ample extracurricular activities. Well-maintained facilities and a fully English-taught curriculum are also appreciated.

Nothing to show

About ~74% of reviews are positive, praising knowledgeable and supportive lecturers, a disciplined environment, and valuable experiences. Negative feedback (~8.3%) mentions issues with infrastructure and administrative processes.

Nothing to show

With a 2.5/5 average, feedback is split equally. Positive comments praise professors' knowledge and helpfulness, while negative reviews cite repetitive and uncaring instructors.

With a perfect 5/5 average rating and 100% positive feedback, students praise the university's practical and theoretical teaching methods. The educational faculty and environment are also highlighted as friendly and supportive.

Rating distribution
5★
55%
100%
0%
28%
0%
0%
100%
4★
18%
0%
0%
33%
0%
50%
0%
3★
27%
0%
0%
31%
100%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
8%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
50%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Not Very Satisfactory

This university has a long way to go in terms of numbers and quality care for their students and also in terms of preparing students for the outside world and I won't recommend it for anyone who wants quality education beyond the norm we experience here. In campus life what stood out for me was my final year project because I had the opportunity of doing a real-life project instead of using animals.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close