Universidad Anáhuac vs Universidad Panamericana vs Le Cordon Bleu Paris vs ISDI Madrid Digital Business School vs Ironhack

Side-by-side comparison from 56 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: CETYS University (5.00)
Universidad Anáhuac: wins 0/4 categories
Universidad Panamericana: wins 0/4 categories
Le Cordon Bleu Paris: wins 0/4 categories
ISDI Madrid Digital Business School: wins 0/4 categories
Ironhack: wins 0/4 categories
CETYS University: wins 4/4 categories
Instituto de Gastronomia de Baja California - IGBC: wins 0/4 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Communication
Aguascalientes, Mexico
4.10
Read more reviews
12 reviews
×
Best programme: Accounting
Best programme: Culinary Arts
Barcelona, Spain
3.00
Read more reviews
2 reviews
×
Best programme: UX/UI Design (User Experience / User Interface Design)
Baja California, Mexico
5.00
Top
Read more reviews
1 reviews
×
Best programme: International Business
Category ratings
Facilities
4.50
4.33
4.50
Not rated
5.00
5.00
Not rated
Location
4.50
4.25
4.75
Not rated
5.00
5.00
Not rated
Professors
4.41
4.50
4.63
Not rated
3.00
5.00
Win
Not rated
Internationality
4.59
3.33
4.63
Not rated
3.00
5.00
Win
Not rated
Student life
4.63
3.67
3.88
Not rated
5.00
5.00
Not rated
Value
4.63
4.33
4.13
Not rated
3.00
5.00
Win
Not rated
Accommodation
4.66
3.75
3.00
Not rated
4.00
5.00
Win
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Leadership and values development
  • +Academic excellence and practical application
  • +Supportive community and modern facilities
  • +Highly qualified professors and academic excellence
  • +Strong business programs and professional connections
  • +Personalized attention and strong sense of community
  • +Exceptional chef instructors and curriculum quality.
  • +Strong emphasis on skill development and practical experience.
  • +Valuable international reputation and alumni network.

Nothing to show

  • +Practical, hands-on learning with immediate application
  • +Experienced, professional instructors with industry expertise
  • +Engaging hybrid learning format
  • +Modern curriculum and technology
  • +Respect for students and their time
  • +Effective professors and learning experience

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Administrative & management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources are a problem.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support is evident.
  • -Intellectualism is perceived as cultish.
  • -Institutions are seen as unreliable sources of truth.
  • -There's a critique of seeking purpose through complex language and power.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment.
  • -Poor communication and administrative support.
  • -Lack of practical application and relevance in coursework.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues.
  • -Perceived lack of value for money.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of necessary resources are a problem.
  • -Communication breakdowns and a lack of support negatively impact the student experience.

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

This institution garners excellent scores, with accommodation standing out as its strongest area at 4.65625. Student life and value also received high marks. Professors represent the area with the lowest rating at 4.40625, though it remains a very positive score. Overall, the university demonstrates considerable strengths in most aspects evaluated.

The university is highly rated for its professors, achieving a strong 4.5. Facilities and value also score well, both at 4.33. Student life, while respectable at 3.67, and accommodation at 3.75 represent areas where ratings are somewhat lower. Internationality is rated the lowest among all categories at 3.33.

Performance varies across key aspects of university life. Outstanding ratings were awarded for Location (4.75) and Professors (4.625), alongside strong marks for Internationality (4.625) and Facilities (4.5). Student Life (3.875) and Value (4.125) received good scores. Accomodation stands out as the weakest area, with a rating of 3.

Nothing to show

With exceptional marks in Facilities and Location, this institution clearly excels in its physical environment and accessibility. Student Life also receives top scores, suggesting a vibrant campus experience. Conversely, the university's weakest areas lie in its Professors and Internationality, both rated a moderate three. Value also sits at this mid-tier rating, indicating areas for potential improvement.

With perfect scores across the board, this institution demonstrates exceptional strength in every evaluated area. Notably, **facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value** all received top marks. There are no discernible weak areas based on these ratings, indicating a consistently outstanding university experience.

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

With ~97% positive feedback and an average of 4.58/5, students praise academic excellence, leadership development, and integral personal growth programs. No negative reviews were recorded.

University students praise academic excellence, professor quality, and modern facilities. ~92% of feedback is positive, with one reviewer expressing concerns about intellectualism.

All eight student reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.63/5. Students highly praise the knowledgeable instructors, quality curriculum, and enriching learning experience.

Nothing to show

With an average rating of 3/5, feedback is evenly split, with ~50% positive and ~50% negative. Positive comments highlight practical, hands-on learning and professional instructors. Negative reviews express dissatisfaction with program value and staff.

This university receives overwhelmingly positive feedback, with 100% of reviews being 4-5 stars and an average rating of 5/5. Students highlight its up-to-date technology and educational practices, along with respect for students and their time.

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
67%
33%
63%
0%
50%
100%
0%
4★
39%
58%
38%
0%
0%
0%
0%
3★
3%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
8%
0%
0%
50%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Student in 2013

I really enjoyed my time at LCB! I've found that my skills when I entered the work force were much higher than others. I think though there was a big portion missing in recipe development and composition. True- we did learn it through memorizing the recipes, but we really were missing classes on how different ingredients affect the final textures.. how you can change them... etc. That I still am not an expert in .. and I create recipes! Ouf! Also, I don't know if you still do a month of sugar work... but that really wasn't necessary and should be either cut or minimized to just 2 lessons. It's such a niche skill to know that I would have really preferred more technical skills. I loved the old location. The "rumors" I'm getting about the new location are that it's not as good, unfortunately - that i's become more of a money focused/marketing machine. I really hope that this image can be fixed as I love LCB and enjoyed my time there! Oh also - there should be more help for students to get jobs and featuring old students accomplishments - from cookbook launches to new bakeries so that current and old students can support them.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close