Universidad Dr. José Gregorio Hernández - UJGH vs Uppsala University vs Federal Polytechnic Ado Ekiti - FPA vs Ekiti State University - EKSU vs Afe Babalola University - ABUAD

Side-by-side comparison from 152 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
Universidad Dr. José Gregorio Hernández - UJGH: wins 0/5 categories
Uppsala University: wins 0/5 categories
Federal Polytechnic Ado Ekiti - FPA: wins 0/5 categories
Ekiti State University - EKSU: wins 0/5 categories
Afe Babalola University - ABUAD: wins 0/5 categories
IAEC University - IAEC: wins 5/5 categories
Cusrow Wadia Institute Of Technology: wins 0/5 categories
Comparing
Uppsala, Sweden
4.00
Read more reviews
43 reviews
×
Best programme: Biology
Best programme: Computer Science
Best programme: Political Science
Best programme: International Relations and Diplomacy
Ado Ekiti, Nigeria
5.00
Read more reviews
1 reviews
×
Best programme: Advertising and Marketing
Best programme: Computer Engineering
Category ratings
Facilities
Not rated
4.10
3.71
3.40
4.17
5.00
Win
4.00
Location
Not rated
4.05
3.62
3.56
3.07
5.00
5.00
Professors
Not rated
4.15
4.00
4.00
4.17
5.00
Win
4.00
Internationality
Not rated
4.00
3.71
3.37
3.93
5.00
Win
3.00
Student life
Not rated
4.08
3.93
3.79
4.00
5.00
5.00
Value
Not rated
3.98
4.43
4.03
4.17
5.00
Win
3.00
Accommodation
Not rated
3.87
3.23
3.33
4.00
5.00
Win
4.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Excellent teaching quality and student preparation
  • +Accessible costs and flexible schedules
  • +Comfortable and safe facilities
  • +High-quality education and research-driven learning
  • +Friendly and knowledgeable academic and non-academic staff
  • +Practical, real-life learning experiences and student-centered guidance
  • +High-quality, practical education and relevant programs
  • +Supportive and knowledgeable faculty
  • +Positive personal and professional development opportunities
  • +Passionate lecturers teaching life skills and academic knowledge
  • +Rigorous academic environment preparing students for future challenges
  • +Supportive relationships between lecturers and students
  • +Excellent lecturers and learning environment
  • +Strong academic quality and personal development
  • +Modern facilities and resources
  • +Progressive academic curriculum in a secure and accommodating atmosphere
  • +Expansive, career-focussed learning modules
  • +State-of-the-art, internationally competitive facilities
  • +Supportive, knowledgeable faculty and career preparation
  • +Wide range of engineering specializations
  • +Balance of academics and extracurriculars
Cons
  • -Excessive administrative burdens and unresponsive management.
  • -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources.
  • -Lack of clear communication and confusing policies.
  • -Negative peer attitudes and lack of collaboration hinder learning.
  • -Disappointing program quality and instructor approach.
  • -Student disinterest and sabotage of work.
  • -Inconsistent and poor administrative and management issues.
  • -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources.
  • -Unengaging curriculum and lack of practical application.
  • -Administrative inefficiency and poor response times cause frustration.
  • -Negative interactions with administrative staff create a hostile environment.
  • -Underutilized or ineffective facility usage hinders practical learning.
  • -Authoritarian management and suppressed student rights.
  • -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources.
  • -Unclear academic processes and poor communication.
  • -Administrative & management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources hinder learning.
  • -Poor communication and lack of support negatively impact student experience.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of resources are major drawbacks.
  • -Course content and teaching quality often fall short of expectations.
Rating summary
What students say

Considering all surveyed aspects, the university presents a consistent, though unexceptional, profile. Its strengths and weaknesses are not clearly delineated as all categories received identical scores. This suggests a uniform, perhaps average, performance across facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and overall value. Further information would be needed to identify areas for potential improvement or distinction.

Examining the university's performance reveals a strong showing in academic and campus-related aspects. Professors (4.15) and Facilities (4.10) received particularly high marks. Student Life (4.08) and Internationality (4.00) also scored well. Conversely, the university's Location (3.66) and Accomodation (3.68) represent areas for potential improvement, while Value (3.98) falls in the mid-range.

An excellent rating for value stands out, indicating strong perceived benefit for students. Conversely, accommodation received the lowest score, suggesting an area for improvement. Other aspects like professors and student life scored highly, while facilities, location, and internationality were rated moderately well. This profile presents a generally positive university experience with a key strength in value and a notable weakness in housing.

This institution demonstrates particular strengths in its **value** for money, achieving a rating of 4.03, closely followed by the quality of its **professors** at 4.0. Conversely, **facilities** represent the area with the lowest score, rating 3.40. **Student life** is also a positive aspect, earning 3.79. Other assessed areas like **location**, **accommodation**, and **internationality** fall in the mid-range.

Academic aspects and overall value receive high marks, with Facilities, Professors, and Value all scoring an impressive 4.17. Student Life and Accommodation are also well-regarded at 4.0. Internationality shows a strong score of 3.93. The university's weakest area, according to the ratings, is its Location, which received a score of 3.07.

The university garners perfect scores in every assessed category. Its facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and overall value are all rated exceptionally. This indicates a uniformly excellent experience with no discernible weak areas based on this rating system.

This institution scores exceptionally well in **Location** and **Student Life**, both receiving a perfect 5 out of 5. Its **Facilities**, **Professors**, and **Accommodation** are also strong, earning a commendable 4. However, **Internationality** and **Value** represent its weakest areas, with ratings of 3. Overall, the university offers a vibrant campus experience in a prime location, though there is room for improvement in its global outreach and perceived financial worth.

Reviews summary
Highlights

With a 4.33/5 average rating, approximately 100% of reviews are positive. Students highlight excellent teacher quality and preparation, comfortable facilities, and flexible/accessible schedules as key strengths.

With 43 reviews, ~98% are positive, praising academic excellence, quality education, and friendly staff. One review expressed disappointment with a specific course's peer and instructor attitudes.

With a 4.13 average rating from 15 reviews, ~87% of feedback is positive. Students praise strategic location, conducive learning environment, and quality education. A minor suggestion for laboratory equipment upgrades was noted.

~74% of reviews are positive, highlighting passionate teaching, goal setting, and impactful life lessons. Negative feedback (~8.3%) cites administrative issues and inefficient processes.

~96.5% of reviews are positive, highlighting competent lecturers, good learning environments, and modern facilities. A small percentage of negative feedback mentioned authoritarian founder and trampled rights.

With one review, the university receives a perfect 5/5 rating. The feedback highlights an exceptional academic curriculum, progressive impact on students, and a secure, serene learning atmosphere supported by state-of-the-art facilities.

With a perfect 5/5 average rating, this university receives overwhelmingly positive feedback. The single review highlights a great academic and extracurricular balance, knowledgeable faculty, and spacious campus. No negative feedback was reported.

Rating distribution
5★
33%
12%
27%
18%
41%
100%
100%
4★
67%
86%
60%
47%
48%
0%
0%
3★
0%
0%
13%
27%
7%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
5%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
2%
0%
3%
3%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Top 3 in Sweden

Uppsala itself is a great city, it's easy to go to Stockholm and Arlanda. But to be in Uppsala as a university student is a whole experience on its own. With Nations, parties, fikas, cafés, parties (yes again), bars, knitting groups and many other events Uppsala has a place for everyone. (The other Universities in the top 3 would be Lund University and...... well the third is not set in stone as there are a few universities and "högskolor" to choose from" In my experience professors and teachers, competence will vary depending. But the great ones are really great.

My HND program experience in FedPoly Ado Ekiti

My time at Federal Polytechnic ADO EKITI was a life changing experience that helped me develop into a well rounded person in addition to giving me the technical skills I required for my job. My professional and personal development are still influenced by the events and lessons i've learned.

Challenging but rewarding experience

Ekiti State University offers solid academic programs and has dedicated lecturers who work hard to support students. The school provides opportunities for growth and learning, but like many public universities in Nigeria, it faces challenges such as strikes, limited facilities, and occasional delays in the academic calendar. The campus environment is lively, and students often create their own support networks to make the most of their time there. Overall, EKSU gives you the chance to earn a good education, but patience and adaptability are definitely needed.

LL.B

I studied law and it was theoretical and practical. The lecturers were good and they tried to be hands-on with the students. The university always upgraded itself. It always looked for ways to be better for the students

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close