University of Zagreb - UNIZG vs Dr. José Matías Delgado University - UJMD vs The University of Auckland vs University of Waikato vs Massey University of New Zealand
Side-by-side comparison from 122 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +High quality and broad knowledge base.
- +Supportive professors and student-faculty connection.
- +Diverse study programs and extra learning opportunities.
- +Comprehensive education with hands-on professional practices
- +Essential knowledge and skills for successful careers
- +In-depth understanding and real-world experience
- +Passionate, world-class faculty and academic support
- +Quality education, resources, and learning environments
- +Strong career guidance and student backing
- +Supportive staff and accessible resources
- +Relevant coursework and flexible learning options
- +Vibrant campus life and social opportunities
- +Supportive and helpful faculty
- +Engaging and diverse course offerings
- +Welcoming campus environment and student support
- +Hands-on learning and industry professionals
- +Supportive and collaborative student community
- +Diverse and practical course offerings
Nothing to show
- -Unorganized administration and unhelpful, uncompassionate professors are a major issue.
- -Outdated and unequipped facilities are a recurring problem.
- -Overly demanding coursework with excessive reading and insufficient practical application frustrates students.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning experiences.
- -Lack of clear communication and student support is a recurring problem.
- -Inadequate faculty instruction and feedback quality.
- -Lack of student support services and social integration.
- -High cost not justified by the overall educational value.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
- -Facilities and equipment are often outdated and poorly maintained.
- -Communication from staff is frequently unclear or lacking.
- -Limited career support and advertised opportunities.
- -Poor academic and administrative support.
- -Administrative and management issues frustrate students.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources are a concern.
- -Course content and teaching methods are perceived as unengaging or irrelevant.
Nothing to show
This university is highly regarded for its **location**, receiving a score of 4.33. Student life and value for money also received strong marks at 3.935 and 3.88 respectively. Conversely, the university's **accommodation** and **internationality** are areas for potential improvement, with ratings of 3.38 and 3.225. Facilities and professors were rated moderately well.
This institution demonstrates considerable strengths, particularly excelling in its prime location and vibrant student life, both receiving perfect scores. Facilities, professors, accommodation, and overall value are also rated highly, indicating a well-rounded educational experience. However, internationality stands out as a weaker area, scoring lower than other assessed aspects.
This institution garners strong marks in several key areas, with its location and professors receiving the highest ratings. Student life and accommodation, while still respectable, present areas for potential improvement. The university also scores well in terms of internationality and value, indicating a generally positive overall student experience.
An evaluation of the university reveals generally positive feedback, with standout scores for Facilities and Professors, both receiving high marks. Location and Internationality also perform well. Student Life emerged as the area with the lowest rating, while Accomodation and Value received solid scores, indicating a generally favorable university experience.
Overall, the university demonstrates considerable strengths, particularly in its **Professors (4.43)** and **Location (4.29)**. Areas such as **Facilities** and **Internationality** also receive a solid rating of 4. Student life is rated well at 3.83. The most moderate scores are observed in **Accomodation (3.2)** and **Student Life**, indicating these could be areas for potential improvement.
Overall, this institution receives strong marks, particularly for its **value**, which is the highest-rated aspect. **Location** and **Professors** also score very well. The primary area for improvement seems to be **Accomodation**, where ratings are noticeably lower compared to other categories. Other factors like Facilities, Student Life, and Internationality are all rated positively and consistently.
Nothing to show
Around 50% of reviews highlight positive aspects like professor organization, broad knowledge, and extra activities. A small percentage (~7.7%) express dissatisfaction with disorganization and outdated facilities.
With an average rating of 4/5, reviews indicate a highly positive experience (~50% positive). Students praise comprehensive education, essential skills, and valuable real-world experience through hands-on practices.
Approximately 95% of reviews are positive, citing passionate lecturers, quality education, and ample resources. A small percentage of negative feedback mentions limited lecturer availability and insufficient feedback on assignments.
With 100% positive feedback and an average rating of 4.42/5, students praise supportive staff, relevant coursework, and flexible learning options. The campus environment and social opportunities are also frequently highlighted.
With a 4.29/5 average rating, ~86% of reviews are positive, highlighting supportive lecturers, interesting courses, and good campus life. One ~14% negative review cited limited career support and lack of exam resources.
Students highly praise the university, noting a supportive atmosphere, hands-on learning, and diverse program offerings. Friendly student interactions and helpful staff are frequently mentioned. No negative feedback was reported.
Nothing to show
My master Agroecology is really interesting with lots of useful subjects, I recommend it to future master students in this field. Professors are always willing to help. Faculty building is not so far from center and its well connected with tram.
Dr. José Matías Delgado University proved to be an exceptional choice for my professional studies. The comprehensive education I received equipped me with the essential knowledge and skills required for a successful career. The curriculum was enhanced by hands-on professional practices, which provided me with valuable real-world experience across various fields. This practical approach facilitated the development of a significant and in-depth understanding of the subjects, thoroughly preparing me for the professional world.
I found that the overall university experience was not really worth my time and money. Respected professors were only actually lecturing for 1-2 weeks per course, with PhD graduates teaching the majority of the course. Sometimes these PhD graduates weren't able to speak fluent English, which made the learning and teaching actually going on very questionable. In addition to this, you would submit a 3000 word essay, and receive a 15-20 words of feedback. I am certain that very little learning, improvement and education can occur when the feedback loop is so minimal, often generic. In addition to this, many of the "lab" or "tutorial" components were actually university students completing post-graduate experiments as part of their thesis studies. For example, in my psych201 tutorial, we had to spend 2 hours looking at a screen only pressing the "X" or "Z" key a total of 1200 times, and if we did not attend this lecture, we would lose 2% of our total grade. Overall, I question how much education and learning goes on, specifically in the Commerce and Science Faculties. I found my high school classes to go into more depth, with the teachers actually providing many one-on-one conversations to ensure learning is taking place, and this is the learnings that allowed me to pass my first 3 years of papers before any new content was covered, after which, the lectures would have half the class walk out because they couldn't speak fluent english, with students opting to self-teach themselves. If you are requiring students to partake in a study, they must be reimbursed for their time, especially if no learning is taking place. If you are charging students $1000 per course, then the university can afford to pay for staff to assess all of the PHD candidates fluency in English, before they are allowed to teach. In addition, no learning can take place when a question is asked in a foreign language, and the tutor/lecturer replies in a foreign language.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show