Kebbi State University of Science and Technology - KSUSTA vs Gunadarma University vs Eastern University Sri Lanka vs Sciences Po Lyon - Sciences Po Lyon vs Universidad Nacional Federico Villarreal - UNFV

Side-by-side comparison from 12 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Sciences Po Lyon - Sciences Po Lyon (5.00)
Kebbi State University of Science and Technology - KSUSTA: wins 0/7 categories
Gunadarma University: wins 2/7 categories
Eastern University Sri Lanka: wins 0/7 categories
Sciences Po Lyon - Sciences Po Lyon: wins 5/7 categories
Universidad Nacional Federico Villarreal - UNFV: wins 0/7 categories
Waziri Umaru Federal Polytechnic - WUFPBK: wins 0/7 categories
University of Guyana - Mrs: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Education Sciences
Jakarta, Indonesia
4.50
Read more reviews
6 reviews
×
Best programme: Applied Psychology
batticaloa, Sri Lanka
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Best programme: International Politics
Best programme: Marketing
East Bank Demerara, Guyana
3.00
Read more reviews
1 reviews
×
Category ratings
Facilities
3.50
4.17
Not rated
5.00
Win
Not rated
4.00
3.00
Location
3.50
4.50
Not rated
5.00
Win
Not rated
3.00
3.00
Professors
4.00
4.50
Win
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
3.50
4.00
Internationality
3.00
4.00
Not rated
5.00
Win
Not rated
3.00
3.00
Student life
4.50
4.17
Not rated
5.00
Win
Not rated
3.50
3.00
Value
4.00
4.50
Not rated
5.00
Win
Not rated
4.50
4.00
Accommodation
3.00
4.17
Win
Not rated
3.00
Not rated
3.00
2.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Supportive lecturers and academic environment
  • +Opportunities for personal growth and success
  • +Positive campus community and student integration
  • +Professional certification and practical learning opportunities
  • +Good facilities and helpful tutors
  • +Strong programs with skilled lecturers

Nothing to show

  • +Strong academic programs and quality education
  • +Welcoming and supportive environment for foreign students
  • +Approachable and communicative administration

Nothing to show

  • +Engaging lectures and supportive faculty
  • +Desire for more practical application alongside theory

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Inconsistent or poor administrative and management support is a major concern.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder the learning experience.
  • -Lack of clear communication and transparency from the institution causes frustration.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause constant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources hinder learning.
  • -A disconnect between curriculum and real-world application is a recurring complaint.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment
  • -Ineffective instruction and curriculum

Nothing to show

  • -Unresponsive and unhelpful administration and management create significant frustration.
  • -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities significantly detract from the learning environment.
  • -Overcrowded classes and a lack of individualized attention hinder academic progress.

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

Student feedback reveals a university with considerable strengths, particularly in **Student Life**, which scored an impressive 4.5. **Professors** also received a solid rating of 4. Areas such as **Facilities** and **Location** garnered a respectable 3.5. The most modest scores were for **Accomodation** (3) and **Internationality** (3). **Value** for money was rated positively at 4.

Across various assessments, this institution demonstrates notable strengths. Its professors, location, and perceived value all received top marks at 4.5. Areas like facilities, student life, and accommodation also scored well, averaging around 4.17. Internationality, while still positive, was the lowest-rated aspect at 4.0. Overall, the university presents a robust offering with particular excellence in its academic staff, setting, and perceived worth.

Nothing to show

This institution excels in several key areas, boasting top scores for its facilities, location, student life, internationality, and overall value. These highlight a vibrant and well-equipped environment. Conversely, accommodation received the lowest rating, suggesting this is an area for potential improvement, while professors were also rated well but slightly lower than the strongest categories.

Nothing to show

This institution excels in **Value** and **Facilities**, receiving high marks in these key areas. Conversely, **Location**, **Accomodation**, and **Internationality** represent its comparatively weaker aspects, scoring a respectable but lower three out of five. **Professors** and **Student Life** fall within the middle range of performance.

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

With a 3.5/5 average rating, ~50% of reviews are positive. Positive feedback highlights helpful lecturers and a conducive study environment. No negative feedback was recorded.

All reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.5/5. Students praise program quality, campus facilities, and helpful staff. No negative feedback was recorded.

Nothing to show

With a 5/5 average rating, the sole review highlighted a profound academic journey in political sciences and international relations. Positive aspects included a stunning campus, distinguished alumni, top-notch education, and a warm welcome for foreign students.

Nothing to show

With a 3.5/5 average, reviews are mostly positive (~50%). One review highlighted great lectures and engaging teaching. There were no negative reviews.

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
0%
50%
0%
100%
0%
0%
0%
4★
50%
50%
0%
0%
0%
50%
0%
3★
50%
0%
0%
0%
0%
50%
100%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close