EUDE Business School vs Universidad Experimental de Guayana - UNEG vs Universidad Nacional Experimental Simón Rodríguez - UNESR vs Oklahoma City University vs Karabük University

Side-by-side comparison from 41 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
EUDE Business School: wins 0/7 categories
Universidad Experimental de Guayana - UNEG: wins 0/7 categories
Universidad Nacional Experimental Simón Rodríguez - UNESR: wins 0/7 categories
Oklahoma City University: wins 5/7 categories
Karabük University: wins 1/7 categories
Kisii University: wins 1/7 categories
Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: MBA and Human Resources
Best programme: Advanced Control and Systems Engineering
Best programme: Administration
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States
5.00
Read more reviews
1 reviews
×
Best programme: Journalism and Mass Communication
Best programme: Bachelor of International Studies
Best programme: Actuarial Mathematics
Best programme: Bachelor of Science
Category ratings
Facilities
Not rated
2.50
3.75
4.00
Win
3.25
3.75
3.67
Location
Not rated
4.00
3.43
2.00
4.25
Win
4.13
3.67
Professors
Not rated
4.00
4.13
5.00
Win
4.00
4.32
4.50
Internationality
Not rated
3.50
3.88
5.00
Win
2.75
3.74
3.75
Student life
Not rated
2.50
4.00
4.00
3.25
4.12
Win
3.67
Value
Not rated
3.50
3.63
5.00
Win
3.50
4.26
4.25
Accommodation
Not rated
3.00
2.57
4.00
Win
3.25
3.60
3.67
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Flexible learning and retake options
  • +Diverse extracurricular activities
  • +Strong MBA and HR programs
  • +High-quality teaching and career programs
  • +Positive campus environment and student experience
  • +Opportunities for personal growth and new adventures
  • +Dynamic and accessible educational environment with committed professors.
  • +Diverse and flexible academic programs.
  • +Encouragement of creativity, research, and social commitment.
  • +Small class sizes and strong professor relationships
  • +Supportive academic and personal environment
  • +Emphasis on community, creativity, and leadership
  • +Academic excellence and comprehensive programs
  • +Supportive international student services and community
  • +Enriching campus life and cultural experiences
  • +Dedicated, knowledgeable faculty and effective program delivery.
  • +Supportive student community and conducive learning environment.
  • +Timely graduations and successful student outcomes.
  • +Academic excellence and research opportunities
  • +Holistic development and personal growth
  • +Strong faculty support and guidance
Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues cause confusion and frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology hinder the learning experience.
  • -Lack of student support and resources leads to feeling unheard and unsupported.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
  • -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources hinder learning.
  • -Lack of clear communication and feedback creates confusion.
  • -Poor academic organization and lack of essential resources like laboratories.
  • -Frequent absence of teaching staff due to low salaries and poor compensation.
  • -University unpreparedness for complex degree programs.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Lack of communication and support from instructors is a recurring concern.
  • -Administrative and management issues, including unnecessary requirements and poor decision-making.
  • -Negative and discriminatory treatment experienced by students.
  • -Unprofessional behavior from university staff.
  • -Administrative & management issues
  • -Uninspiring curriculum
  • -Restrictive environment
Rating summary
What students say

Across all assessed categories, this institution received a uniform rating of zero. This indicates no discernible strengths or weaknesses were identified in facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, or overall value. The absence of any positive or negative scores suggests a neutral outcome in every surveyed aspect of the university experience.

This institution demonstrates strengths in its teaching quality and geographic positioning, both receiving a strong 4 out of 5. However, its facilities and student life offerings are areas for improvement, each scoring a lower 2.5. Accommodations and its international profile are moderately rated at 3 and 3.5 respectively, with value for money also reflecting a decent 3.5.

Overall, this university garners positive feedback across most aspects. Professors and student life stand out as particular strengths. However, accommodation received the lowest marks, indicating a significant area for improvement. The university also scored moderately well in facilities, location, internationality, and value, suggesting a generally satisfactory, though not exceptional, experience in these regards.

This institution excels in academic quality and global engagement, evident in its perfect scores for Professors and Internationality. Students can also expect excellent value for their investment. However, the university's weakest point is its Location, receiving a low rating. Facilities, Student Life, and Accommodation are all rated positively, suggesting a generally good student experience outside of the geographical drawback.

The university demonstrates particular strengths in its **location**, scoring a high 4.25. Performance in **professors** is also commendable at 4. Conversely, **internationality** emerges as the weakest area with a score of 2.75. Other aspects such as facilities, student life, and accommodation fall within a similar range, with the value for money rated at a respectable 3.5.

Academic staff and the overall value proposition are notable strengths, indicated by high scores for Professors (4.32) and Value (4.26). Student Life (4.12) and Location (4.13) also received positive evaluations. Areas for potential improvement include Facilities (3.75) and Accomodation (3.6), which received the lowest ratings. Internationality (3.74) sits mid-range in the provided feedback.

This university presents a strong academic offering, with Professors receiving a high rating of 4.5. Value for money is also well-regarded at 4.25. Areas for potential improvement include Facilities, Location, Student Life, and Accommodation, all averaging around 3.67. Internationality also scores moderately well at 3.75.

Reviews summary
Highlights

The single review is overwhelmingly positive, rating the university 5/5. This indicates a highly satisfactory experience with no reported negative feedback.

With an average rating of 4.5/5 and 0% negative feedback, 100% of reviews are positive. Students highlight opportunities to study desired careers and excellent teaching programs, despite some mentioning a need for better facilities.

90% of reviewers praise the dynamic environment, quality professors, and diverse programs. One reviewer noted concerns about professor feedback and missing faculty, representing 10% of feedback.

With a perfect 5/5 average rating, this university garners universally positive feedback. Students highlight small class sizes, strong professor relationships, and a supportive community focused on creativity and leadership. No negative feedback was reported.

With a 4/5 average rating, ~75% of students report a positive experience, highlighting academic quality, facilities, and a vibrant campus life. ~25% of feedback mentions negative aspects, including administrative issues and discriminatory treatment.

With a 4.32 average rating from 19 reviews, most students praise knowledgeable faculty, supportive communities, and timely graduations. A small percentage (~5%) noted unprofessional social media activity.

University reviews are largely positive, with 75% of feedback being 4-5 stars. Students praise academic excellence, holistic development, and a supportive learning environment. A small portion of feedback (25%) notes a strict atmosphere, likening it to a school.

Rating distribution
5★
100%
50%
60%
100%
75%
53%
50%
4★
0%
50%
30%
0%
0%
37%
25%
3★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
5%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
25%
1★
0%
0%
10%
0%
25%
5%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Vet

The Simón Rodríguez University had many shortcomings in terms of the study and organization to teach the degree in veterinary medicine, there were not even laboratories and the teaching staff was very infrequent due to the very low salary that the teachers received for their work, the university did not I was prepared to take on a career of that magnitude.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

No control of staff

This is a university yet allows their Social Media people to spend all day trolling facebook football sites. How can this place be taken seriously? If you want to know more just go look at the forum posting activity, how unprofessional for an academic institution - tells you all you need to know

Transformative Education and Holistic Growth

Amrita University provided a transformative experience during my graduation. With its excellent academic framework, experienced faculty, and state-of-the-art infrastructure, it fostered both intellectual and personal growth. The curriculum balanced theoretical knowledge with practical application, and research opportunities were abundant. Campus life was vibrant, with diverse extracurricular activities that encouraged holistic development. The university’s focus on ethics, compassion, and global exposure shaped me into a responsible individual. The inclusive environment, cultural diversity, and strong values helped me grow academically and socially, making Amrita a remarkable institution that prepares students for success in both their careers and life.

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close