Qafqaz University - QU vs Azerbaijan State University of Economics vs Azerbaijan State Oil and Industry University vs Azerbaijan University - AU vs Azerbaijan Technical University
Side-by-side comparison from 11 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Broad and in-depth subject coverage
- +Extensive practical laboratory experience
- +High academic standards and rigorous curriculum
- +Expert faculty and quality education in economics, marketing, management, and IT
- +Supportive community and opportunities for skill development and career advancement
- +Vibrant student life and enjoyable campus environment
- +Strong technical and English-language engineering programs
- +Opportunities for collaborative projects
- +Improved practical and real-world learning experiences
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of essential resources hinder learning.
- -Poor communication and lack of support create a negative student experience.
- -Students dislike administrative and management issues.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of resources frustrate students.
- -Ineffective teaching and poor curriculum design are major complaints.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
- -Facilities are outdated and poorly maintained.
- -Poor communication and lack of support are common complaints.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Review of this institution reveals a uniform rating of zero across all surveyed categories. Consequently, there are no particular strengths or weaknesses to highlight; every aspect of the university's offering, from facilities and professors to student life and value, is assessed at the lowest possible mark. This indicates a need for comprehensive improvement across the board.
With excellent scores for location and student life, this institution shines in these aspects. Professors also received a very strong rating. However, accommodation and internationality present areas with comparatively lower scores. Facilities are rated moderately, while value for money is considered good.
This institution demonstrates exceptional strengths in its academic and living environments. Professors and accommodation both received perfect scores, indicating high quality in teaching and student housing. Student life and internationality also scored highly, suggesting a vibrant and diverse campus experience. Facilities were rated well, but the location received a score of zero, indicating a significant area for improvement. Overall, the university offers strong value.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
With a 4/5 average rating and no negative feedback, students report a very positive experience. One student highlighted extensive chemistry coursework as unexpected for their education department.
All 7 reviews are positive, averaging 4.57/5 stars. Students highlight excellent faculty expertise, strong career support, and engaging campus life. Some suggest improvements for campus housing.
With a 4/5 average rating, the single review highlights strong technical engineering education in English and collaborative project opportunities. Some desire for more practical, real-world application in courses exists.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show