London School of Commerce - LSC vs International College of Business and Technology - ICBT vs BMS Colombo Graduate School vs Nawaloka College of higher studies - NCHS vs Sri Lanka Institute of Information Technology
Side-by-side comparison from 22 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Accessible resources and supportive faculty
- +Engaging learning environment and quality instruction
- +Opportunities for exposure and growth
- +Excellent, dedicated lecturers and advanced teaching techniques
- +Diverse course offerings and well-equipped facilities
- +Positive student life and overall supportive campus environment
- +Supportive and motivating lecturers and staff
- +Flexible weekend programs for working students
Nothing to show
- +Practical courses and knowledgeable, helpful lecturers
- +Good campus facilities and opportunities for growth
- +Strong academic reputation and graduate placements
Nothing to show
- +Hands-on experience.
- +Strong reputation in business management and biomedical sciences.
- +UK transfer options.
- -Administrative and communication issues cause stress.
- -Lack of support is a recurring problem.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and technology hinder the learning experience.
- -Lack of clear communication and support from faculty and staff is a recurring problem.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration and inefficiency.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources hinder learning.
- -Overcrowded classes and insufficient student support lead to a negative experience.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative & management issues are a significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are frequently criticized.
- -Poor communication and a perceived lack of support are recurring complaints.
Nothing to show
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a recurring problem.
- -Inefficient administrative and management systems cause frustration.
- -Lack of resources and support hinder academic progress.
This institution shines brightest in its location, receiving a near-perfect score. Student life and internationality are also areas of moderate strength. Conversely, accommodation stands out as a significant weakness, along with the perceived value of the education. Ratings for facilities and professors are average.
This institution receives high marks across the board. Notably, professors, student life, and value are exceptionally strong areas, each earning a rating of 4.625. Internationality and location also score well at 4.25 and 4.375, respectively. The weakest area, though still solid, is facilities, rated at 4.0.
This university garners strong marks in several key areas, notably achieving a perfect score for its professors. Facilities, location, student life, and internationality all received solid ratings of 4. Accommodations represent a comparatively weaker area with a score of 3. Overall, it offers a positive experience with excellent teaching and good campus resources.
Nothing to show
Outstanding performance is evident in the university's facilities, achieving a near-perfect score. Professors and value also received very strong marks. Student life and location are rated favorably, with internationality also proving to be a positive aspect. However, accommodation presents a notable area for improvement, with a significantly lower rating compared to other metrics.
Nothing to show
This institution garners exceptional marks in several key areas, including Facilities, Professors, Location, Student Life, and Internationality, all receiving a perfect score. Accommodations present a notable area for improvement, rated at a 3, while Value is also strong at 4. Overall, the university excels in student experience and academic offerings, with accommodations being the primary point of consideration.
The university receives predominantly positive feedback (~75%) with students praising supportive instructors and good facilities. A smaller portion of reviews (~25%) notes administrative delays and communication issues.
With an average rating of 4.5/5, ~88% of reviews are positive. Students highlight excellent lecturers and flexible class timings, alongside well-equipped labs and facilities. No negative feedback was provided.
The single review was positive (100%), giving a 4/5 average. Feedback highlighted supportive lecturers and staff and convenient weekend degree programs.
Nothing to show
With an average rating of 4.38/5 from 8 reviews, ~75% of feedback is positive. Students highlight practical courses, helpful lecturers, and good internship opportunities. Minor administrative slowness was noted once.
Nothing to show
This university receives overwhelmingly positive feedback, with ~100% of reviews being highly favorable. Students specifically praise hands-on experience and strong programs in business management and biomedical sciences. Transfer options to the UK are also highlighted.
Nothing to show
I am a student of Bsc (Hons) Nursing 07th batch (Galle branch). I recommend ICBT Galle branch to start Nursing Bsc and this is the best place for it. They have very excellent lecturers and progress is also very consistent. I really appreciate the dedication of previous Coordinator Miss Kanchana Panditha (presently Miss Kanchana Panditha-Assistant Manager-Academic Administration). Undergraduate Department, ICBT Colombo Camp) . All the best
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
