Instituto Superior Mariano Moreno - ISMM vs University of Agriculture Faisalabad vs Government College University Faisalabad vs Government College Women University Faisalabad vs National Textile University

Side-by-side comparison from 23 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Rajshahi College (5.00)
Instituto Superior Mariano Moreno - ISMM: wins 0/6 categories
University of Agriculture Faisalabad: wins 1/6 categories
Government College University Faisalabad: wins 0/6 categories
Government College Women University Faisalabad: wins 3/6 categories
National Textile University: wins 0/6 categories
Superior College: wins 0/6 categories
Rajshahi College: wins 2/6 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Agricultural Science
Best programme: Applied Statistics
Best programme: Chemistry
Faisalabad, Pakistan
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Faisalabad, Pakistan
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Rajshahi, Bangladesh
5.00
Top
Read more reviews
1 reviews
×
Best programme: School of Arts and Sciences
Category ratings
Facilities
Not rated
3.50
3.60
3.50
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
Win
Location
Not rated
4.40
4.10
4.50
Win
Not rated
Not rated
3.00
Professors
Not rated
3.90
4.10
4.50
Win
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
Internationality
Not rated
4.00
3.20
4.50
Win
Not rated
Not rated
2.00
Student life
Not rated
3.90
4.00
3.00
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Win
Value
Not rated
4.20
4.20
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
Accommodation
Not rated
3.80
Win
3.60
3.50
Not rated
Not rated
1.00
Pros & Cons
Pros

Nothing to show

  • +Supportive and cooperative faculty and staff
  • +Balanced academic rigor with practical application and hands-on learning
  • +Good facilities, including grounds, labs, and hostels, at affordable costs
  • +Engaging and supportive learning environment with knowledgeable and approachable faculty
  • +Affordable fees and excellent academic programs for future career prospects
  • +Beautiful campus, modern facilities, and vibrant extracurricular opportunities
  • +Empowerment and holistic development
  • +Supportive and understanding professors
  • +Focused and clean learning environment

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • +Future-shaping education and opportunities
  • +Engaging teaching quality
Cons

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues caused frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment detracted from the learning experience.
  • -Lack of essential resources and support negatively impacted studies.
  • -Unhelpful administrative staff and unclear communication.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment.
  • -Lack of support for student well-being and mental health.
  • -Disorganized administration and unclear communication.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources.
  • -Ineffective teaching methods and unengaging curriculum.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues disrupt operations.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support frustrates students.
Rating summary
What students say

Nothing to show

Performance across various aspects reveals a positive university profile. The institution excels in its **Location**, boasting a high rating of 4.4. **Value** and **Internationality** also stand out with strong scores of 4.2 and 4 respectively. Conversely, **Facilities** represent the weakest area, receiving a rating of 3.5, while **Professors** and **Student Life** are rated a solid 3.9. **Accomodation** also scores well at 3.8.

Overall, this institution garners positive feedback, with its **location** and **value for money** standing out as exceptionally strong points. The teaching staff also receive high marks, reflecting positively on **professors**. Areas that could see improvement include **internationality**, which is rated lower than other aspects, and **facilities** and **accommodation**, which are considered average. Student life receives solid, mid-range scores.

This institution excels with particularly high marks in **Professors**, **Location**, and **Internationality**, all scoring an impressive 4.5. The **Value** for money is also strong at 4. Areas for potential improvement include **Student Life**, which received a rating of 3, and **Facilities** and **Accomodation**, both averaging 3.5.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This institution demonstrates particular strengths in student life, receiving a perfect score, and also performs well in facilities, professors, and value, all rated at a solid 4. However, accommodation stands out as a significant weakness, with a score of just 1. Internationality and location also appear to be areas for improvement, earning scores of 2 and 3 respectively.

Reviews summary
Highlights

Nothing to show

Nine out of ten reviews are positive, with students highlighting cooperative professors and staff, good infrastructure, and a student-friendly environment. No negative feedback was recorded.

Nearly all (around 70%) of the 10 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4/5. Students highlight the supportive learning environment, knowledgeable and approachable faculty, and reasonable fees as key strengths.

With a 4.5/5 average rating, all feedback is positive. Reviews highlight empowerment, a focus on academics, and a clean, disciplined environment conducive to student success.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

The single review is highly positive, giving a 5/5 rating. This indicates ~100% positive feedback, with no negative comments. The student praised the college's preparation for the future and the quality of teaching in specific subjects.

Rating distribution
5★
0%
30%
30%
50%
0%
0%
100%
4★
0%
60%
40%
50%
0%
0%
0%
3★
0%
10%
30%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close