Vietnam National University vs Academy of Finance - AOF vs Hanoi Law University vs Ho Chi Minh City University Of Law - ULAW vs Hanoi University of Industry

Side-by-side comparison from 62 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Hanoi University of Industry (4.60)
Vietnam National University: wins 0/5 categories
Academy of Finance - AOF: wins 0/5 categories
Hanoi Law University: wins 1/5 categories
Ho Chi Minh City University Of Law - ULAW: wins 0/5 categories
Hanoi University of Industry: wins 0/5 categories
British University Vietnam - BUV: wins 3/5 categories
FPT University: wins 1/5 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Business Administration
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Best programme: School of Law
Best programme: Data Science
Best programme: BSc Computer Science (awarded by University of Staffordshire)
Hanoi, Vietnam
4.30
Read more reviews
4 reviews
×
Best programme: Communication and Media Studies
Category ratings
Facilities
4.00
Not rated
4.00
3.00
4.25
4.69
Win
4.25
Location
4.75
Not rated
4.50
2.00
4.00
4.20
4.75
Professors
4.40
Not rated
5.00
3.00
4.00
4.55
5.00
Internationality
4.00
Not rated
4.00
2.00
3.80
4.07
4.25
Win
Student life
4.00
Not rated
4.25
3.00
4.25
4.40
Win
3.75
Value
4.00
Not rated
4.75
Win
3.00
4.00
4.48
4.25
Accommodation
3.25
Not rated
4.00
3.00
3.75
4.33
Win
4.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Passionate and knowledgeable lecturers with practical insights
  • +Strong international cooperation network and reputable faculty
  • +High quality of education with unique training models

Nothing to show

  • +Excellent professors and academic rigor
  • +High-quality facilities and resources
  • +Strong career focus and supportive environment

Nothing to show

  • +Practical and industry-aligned curriculum
  • +Supportive and enthusiastic professors
  • +Friendly and welcoming student environment
  • +Modern campus & supportive international environment
  • +Qualified & passionate faculty
  • +Affordable British-standard education
  • +Practical, hands-on learning opportunities
  • +Supportive environment for self-motivated learners
  • +Useful curriculum for real-world application
Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Course content is perceived as irrelevant or poorly structured.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are commonly criticized.
  • -Lack of effective communication and support for students is a recurring problem.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues create significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Poor communication and lack of support from staff are prevalent.
  • -Lack of professor support and engagement with student curiosity.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a recurring complaint.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support from staff is a significant problem.
Rating summary
What students say

This institution garners impressive scores, particularly excelling in its **location**, which received a near-perfect rating of 4.75. **Professors** are also highly regarded at 4.4. While many aspects, including facilities, student life, and internationality, achieved a solid 4, **accommodation** stands out as the weakest area, with a score of 3.25. Overall, the university presents a well-rounded offering with a few key strengths.

Nothing to show

This institution demonstrates particular strength in its **professors (5)** and **value (4.75)**. It also scores very well for **location (4.5)** and **student life (4.25)**. While still strong, areas like **facilities (4)**, **accommodation (4)**, and **internationality (4)** received slightly lower, though still positive, marks.

Nothing to show

This institution demonstrates impressive strengths in its **Facilities** and **Student Life**, both receiving a high score of 4.25. While generally well-regarded, **Accomodation** stands out as a comparatively weaker area with a rating of 3.75. Other aspects like Professors, Location, Internationality, and Value also received solid scores, indicating a positive overall student experience.

This institution excels in its facilities, earning a near-perfect score. Professors also receive commendation for their quality. Areas for potential improvement include internationality, which scored the lowest among the surveyed aspects. Student life, accommodation, and value all demonstrate solid, above-average performance, alongside a respectable location rating.

Overall, this institution scores well across most metrics. Its strongest areas are clearly Professors, receiving a perfect score, and Location, which is highly rated at 4.75. Facilities and Internationality both achieve a solid 4.25. Student Life emerges as the weakest point, scoring 3.75. Accommodation and Value round out the positive scores at 4 and 4.25 respectively.

Reviews summary
Highlights

With a 4.33/5 average rating from 6 reviews, university students praise lecturers' passion and expertise, alongside strong international cooperation (~83% positive). Some note outdated technology integration and course content.

Nothing to show

With a 4.5/5 rating from 4 reviews, student feedback is overwhelmingly positive (~100%). Recurring themes highlight top-notch facilities and experienced, dedicated professors. Some mention a heavy workload and administrative process slowness.

Nothing to show

With a 4.6/5 average rating from 5 reviews, ~80% are highly positive. Recurring themes praise practical IT curricula, supportive professors, and a welcoming environment. Limited facilities were a minor concern in some feedback.

With 4.45 stars from 42 reviews, most students praise the modern campus, supportive, qualified international faculty, and friendly, diverse student body. One review cited a lack of in-depth professor support.

Reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~75%), highlighting engaging curricula with hands-on projects and practical experience. There is no negative feedback in the provided sample.

Rating distribution
5★
50%
0%
50%
0%
80%
57%
50%
4★
33%
0%
50%
0%
0%
33%
25%
3★
17%
0%
0%
100%
20%
7%
25%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

BUV - The Engagement Hub

As a Chinese international student at BUV, I’ve had a wonderful experience. The students, teachers, and staff are always so friendly and ready to help with anything. There are so many clubs and activities, from skill-building workshops to just-for-fun events, and it feels like there’s something for everyone. These activities have helped me learn new things and make great friends. BUV is not just about academics it’s also a vibrant community where I feel supported and engaged.

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close