Bina Nusantara University - UBN vs University of Indonesia - UI vs Universitas Terbuka - UT vs Yarsi University vs Trisakti Insurance Business School - STMA TRISAKTI

Side-by-side comparison from 75 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Jakarta State University (4.70)
Bina Nusantara University - UBN: wins 0/5 categories
University of Indonesia - UI: wins 0/5 categories
Universitas Terbuka - UT: wins 0/5 categories
Yarsi University: wins 5/5 categories
Trisakti Insurance Business School - STMA TRISAKTI: wins 0/5 categories
Jakarta State University: wins 0/5 categories
University of Bunda Mulia - UBM: wins 0/5 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Computer Science
Best programme: Art and Design
Jakarta, Indonesia
4.50
Read more reviews
18 reviews
×
Best programme: Management
Jakarta, Indonesia
4.00
Read more reviews
1 reviews
×
Best programme: Law
Best programme: Accounting
Jakarta, Indonesia
4.70
Top
Read more reviews
3 reviews
×
Best programme: Food Industry
Category ratings
Facilities
4.43
4.22
4.28
5.00
Win
4.00
4.33
Not rated
Location
4.15
4.37
4.59
5.00
4.00
5.00
Not rated
Professors
4.64
4.50
4.17
5.00
4.33
5.00
Not rated
Internationality
4.71
4.33
4.17
5.00
Win
3.67
4.67
Not rated
Student life
4.21
4.42
4.17
5.00
Win
4.50
4.67
Not rated
Value
4.57
4.42
4.39
5.00
Win
4.00
4.67
Not rated
Accommodation
4.38
4.14
4.13
5.00
Win
3.33
4.67
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Diverse study programs and numerous student organizations
  • +Supportive lecturers and accommodating, modern facilities
  • +Opportunities for personal growth and peer connection
  • +Strong academic programs and faculty expertise
  • +Opportunities for practical application and professional development
  • +Supportive community and valuable alumni network
  • +Flexible and accessible distance learning for working professionals.
  • +Well-structured academic programs with good quality materials.
  • +Supportive faculty and organized learning environment.
  • +Cleanliness and modern facilities
  • +Kind, friendly staff and lecturers
  • +Integrated technology like CCTV and Wi-Fi
  • +Strong academic programs and knowledgeable lecturers
  • +Diverse range of programs and majors
  • +Good course material and practical applications
  • +High-quality, career-ready graduates.
  • +Comprehensive, innovative, and practical academic programs.
  • +Excellent facilities and pleasant learning environment.

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Inefficient administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning experiences.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support from faculty and staff is a problem.
  • -Lack of alignment between course outlines and actual class content.
  • -Substandard experience for international students.
  • -Lack of effective communication and administrative issues.
  • -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources.
  • -Inconsistent teaching quality and curriculum relevance.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a significant source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources impede learning and comfort.
  • -Inconsistent course quality and teaching effectiveness are a common complaint.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources are a problem.
  • -Communication from the institution is frequently poor.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of necessary resources are significant drawbacks.
  • -The curriculum is often perceived as irrelevant or poorly structured.

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

Across various evaluated aspects, this institution receives strong marks. Internationality stands out as the highest-rated area, followed closely by its professors and overall value. Accommodation and student life also score very well. The weakest performing category, though still positive, is location.

Overall, the university receives strong ratings across multiple aspects. Professors are exceptionally well-regarded, achieving the highest score. Student life and value for money are also rated very highly. The weakest area, though still positive, is accommodation. Facilities and location also score well, demonstrating a generally positive student experience.

With an exceptional score of 4.59, the university's **location** stands out as its strongest attribute. Other well-regarded areas include **facilities** (4.28) and **value** (4.39). The **accommodation** score, at 4.13, is slightly lower in comparison but still reflects a positive reception across most surveyed aspects of student experience.

This institution receives perfect scores across the board, indicating outstanding performance in all evaluated areas. Facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and perceived value are all rated at the highest possible level, presenting a uniformly excellent experience for students. There are no discernible weak areas based on these ratings.

Student feedback paints a generally positive picture, with **Student Life** standing out as the strongest area at 4.5. **Professors** also receive high marks. The university's **Accomodation** is identified as the weakest point, with a rating of 3.33. Overall, **Facilities**, **Location**, and **Value** are consistently rated well, indicating a solid institutional offering.

This university demonstrates exceptional strength, with perfect scores for both its professors and location. Students also report highly positive experiences with student life, accommodation, internationality, and value. The facilities receive a solid rating, representing the only area below a 4.5, yet still indicating a strong overall offering.

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

All 14 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.64/5. Students highlight engaging study programs, personal growth opportunities, and accommodating lecturers and facilities. Extracurriculars and modern campuses are also frequently praised.

University of Indonesia receives overwhelmingly positive feedback (97%), with students praising its academic rigor, professional lecturers, and diverse opportunities for personal and professional growth. A small percentage of negative reviews mention specific program discrepancies.

With a 4.5/5 average rating and no negative feedback, students praise flexibility for working professionals and accessible, well-organized materials. ~94% of feedback is positive.

With a 4/5 average rating from one review, Yarsi University is positively perceived as a good Muslim campus. The single review highlights cleanliness and modern facilities. Negative feedback is negligible.

All three reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.33/5. Students praise knowledgeable lecturers and well-balanced curricula. One reviewer noted minor issues with class registration and system functionality.

With an average rating of 4.67/5, the three reviews are entirely positive. Students highlight the university's role in preparing graduates for the workforce, comprehensive culinary arts curriculum, and good campus facilities and accessibility.

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
64%
64%
56%
0%
33%
67%
0%
4★
36%
31%
39%
100%
67%
33%
0%
3★
0%
3%
6%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
3%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

International student office

I wouldn't recommend UI for Masters students especially for Faculty of Business. The course outlines are sexed up, but when it comes to class its opposite. If you're an international, better to find any other programs.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close