University of Indonesia - UI vs Gunadarma University vs Indonesian State College of Meteorology Climatology and Geophysics - STMKG vs Esa Unggul University - UEU vs Universitas Prof Dr Moestopo Beragama
Side-by-side comparison from 46 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Strong academic programs and faculty expertise
- +Opportunities for practical application and professional development
- +Supportive community and valuable alumni network
- +Professional certification and practical learning opportunities
- +Good facilities and helpful tutors
- +Strong programs with skilled lecturers
Nothing to show
- +Accessible location and engaging classroom environment
- +Supportive and guiding lecturers
- +Opportunities for critical thinking and discussion
- +Interactive and comprehensible learning environment.
- +Balanced theory and practical application for workforce skills.
- +Approachable and supportive lecturers offering teamwork and project opportunities.
- +Strong career preparation in international trade and business.
Nothing to show
- -Lack of alignment between course outlines and actual class content.
- -Substandard experience for international students.
- -Administrative and management issues cause constant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources hinder learning.
- -A disconnect between curriculum and real-world application is a recurring complaint.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and technology are a significant drawback.
- -Lack of clear communication and student support is a problem.
- -Disorganized and unhelpful administrative and management processes cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and inadequate resources hinder effective learning.
- -Lack of clear communication and transparency from instructors and the institution is a persistent problem.
- -Administrative and management issues create significant problems.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of resources hinder learning.
- -Lack of instructor engagement and course structure disappoints students.
Nothing to show
Overall, the university receives strong ratings across multiple aspects. Professors are exceptionally well-regarded, achieving the highest score. Student life and value for money are also rated very highly. The weakest area, though still positive, is accommodation. Facilities and location also score well, demonstrating a generally positive student experience.
Across various assessments, this institution demonstrates notable strengths. Its professors, location, and perceived value all received top marks at 4.5. Areas like facilities, student life, and accommodation also scored well, averaging around 4.17. Internationality, while still positive, was the lowest-rated aspect at 4.0. Overall, the university presents a robust offering with particular excellence in its academic staff, setting, and perceived worth.
Nothing to show
This institution demonstrates outstanding strengths across multiple facets. Its location and student life receive perfect scores, while facilities, professors, accommodation, and internationality are all highly rated at 4.5. Value also stands out with a perfect score. While all areas are strong, the university truly excels in providing an exceptional student experience and an advantageous location.
This institution receives strong marks in several key areas. Its location is exceptionally rated at 5, and student life and professors both score well with a 4. Areas for improvement are facilities and accommodation, each receiving a 3, which represent the weakest aspects of the university's offering. Internationality also sits at a moderate 3.
Across the board, this institution achieves commendable scores in all evaluated aspects. Facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and perceived value all stand at a strong 4 out of 5. The consistent high marks suggest a well-rounded and positive university experience with no single area significantly lagging behind others.
Nothing to show
University of Indonesia receives overwhelmingly positive feedback (97%), with students praising its academic rigor, professional lecturers, and diverse opportunities for personal and professional growth. A small percentage of negative reviews mention specific program discrepancies.
All reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.5/5. Students praise program quality, campus facilities, and helpful staff. No negative feedback was recorded.
Nothing to show
With an average rating of 4.5/5, all feedback is positive. Students praise the strategic location and accessible campus. They also highlight caring lecturers who provide guidance and encourage critical thinking.
With a perfect 5/5 average rating, this university receives overwhelmingly positive feedback. Students highlight an eventful and immersive learning experience, with interactive and easy-to-comprehend lectures. No negative reviews were recorded.
With a 4/5 average rating from one review, feedback is overwhelmingly positive. The student praised the program's blend of theory and practice, supportive lecturers, and career preparation. No negative feedback was recorded.
Nothing to show
I wouldn't recommend UI for Masters students especially for Faculty of Business. The course outlines are sexed up, but when it comes to class its opposite. If you're an international, better to find any other programs.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
The esa unggul campus is one of the best private universities in the city of Jakarta with a strategic location, easily accessible by various modes of public transportation. With an attractive classroom atmosphere and professional classroom teachers, it creates an informative class.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show