University of Indonesia - UI vs Gunadarma University vs Yarsi University vs Universitas Pertamina vs Tanri Abeng University - TAU
Side-by-side comparison from 48 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Strong academics, critical thinking, and practical application focus
- +Excellent lecturers and diverse, supportive community
- +Renowned alumni network and career opportunities
- +Professional certification and practical learning opportunities
- +Good facilities and helpful tutors
- +Strong programs with skilled lecturers
- +Cleanliness and modern facilities
- +Kind, friendly staff and lecturers
- +Integrated technology like CCTV and Wi-Fi
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- +Strong academic programs and knowledgeable lecturers
- +Diverse range of programs and majors
- +Good course material and practical applications
- +High-quality, career-ready graduates.
- +Comprehensive, innovative, and practical academic programs.
- +Excellent facilities and pleasant learning environment.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are prevalent.
- -Lack of resources and support hinders learning.
- -Administrative and management issues cause constant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources hinder learning.
- -A disconnect between curriculum and real-world application is a recurring complaint.
- -Administrative and management issues are a significant source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources impede learning and comfort.
- -Inconsistent course quality and teaching effectiveness are a common complaint.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources are a problem.
- -Communication from the institution is frequently poor.
- -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of necessary resources are significant drawbacks.
- -The curriculum is often perceived as irrelevant or poorly structured.
Across multiple assessments, this institution demonstrates a strong performance, particularly excelling in **Professors**, **Student Life**, and **Value**, all receiving a perfect score. **Location** and **Internationality** also score highly. The **Facilities** and **Accomodation** are rated slightly lower, though still well above average, indicating these are the areas with the most room for improvement within an otherwise excellent profile.
Across various assessments, this institution demonstrates notable strengths. Its professors, location, and perceived value all received top marks at 4.5. Areas like facilities, student life, and accommodation also scored well, averaging around 4.17. Internationality, while still positive, was the lowest-rated aspect at 4.0. Overall, the university presents a robust offering with particular excellence in its academic staff, setting, and perceived worth.
This institution receives perfect scores across the board, indicating outstanding performance in all evaluated areas. Facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and perceived value are all rated at the highest possible level, presenting a uniformly excellent experience for students. There are no discernible weak areas based on these ratings.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Student feedback paints a generally positive picture, with **Student Life** standing out as the strongest area at 4.5. **Professors** also receive high marks. The university's **Accomodation** is identified as the weakest point, with a rating of 3.33. Overall, **Facilities**, **Location**, and **Value** are consistently rated well, indicating a solid institutional offering.
This university demonstrates exceptional strength, with perfect scores for both its professors and location. Students also report highly positive experiences with student life, accommodation, internationality, and value. The facilities receive a solid rating, representing the only area below a 4.5, yet still indicating a strong overall offering.
Nearly all 100% of reviews are positive, highlighting excellent academic programs, professional faculty, and good facilities. Some praise campus improvements and alumni network benefits. No negative reviews were provided.
All reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.5/5. Students praise program quality, campus facilities, and helpful staff. No negative feedback was recorded.
With a 4/5 average rating from one review, Yarsi University is positively perceived as a good Muslim campus. The single review highlights cleanliness and modern facilities. Negative feedback is negligible.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
All three reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.33/5. Students praise knowledgeable lecturers and well-balanced curricula. One reviewer noted minor issues with class registration and system functionality.
With an average rating of 4.67/5, the three reviews are entirely positive. Students highlight the university's role in preparing graduates for the workforce, comprehensive culinary arts curriculum, and good campus facilities and accessibility.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show