LSPR Communication & Business Institute - LSPR vs University of Indonesia - UI vs Gunadarma University vs Universitas Pertamina vs Trisakti Insurance Business School - STMA TRISAKTI

Side-by-side comparison from 50 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: University of Indonesia - UI (4.60)
LSPR Communication & Business Institute - LSPR: wins 4/6 categories
University of Indonesia - UI: wins 0/6 categories
Gunadarma University: wins 1/6 categories
Universitas Pertamina: wins 0/6 categories
Trisakti Insurance Business School - STMA TRISAKTI: wins 1/6 categories
Politeknik APP Jakarta: wins 0/6 categories
Universitas Nasional - UNAS: wins 0/6 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Advertising and Communication
4.60
Top
Read more reviews
36 reviews
×
Best programme: Art and Design
Jakarta, Indonesia
4.50
Read more reviews
6 reviews
×
Best programme: Applied Psychology
Jakarta, Indonesia
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Best programme: Accounting
Jakarta, Indonesia
4.00
Read more reviews
1 reviews
×
Best programme: International Trade
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Category ratings
Facilities
4.25
Win
4.22
4.17
Not rated
4.00
4.00
Not rated
Location
4.75
Win
4.37
4.50
Not rated
4.00
4.00
Not rated
Professors
4.75
Win
4.50
4.50
Not rated
4.33
4.00
Not rated
Internationality
4.75
Win
4.33
4.00
Not rated
3.67
4.00
Not rated
Student life
4.00
4.42
4.17
Not rated
4.50
Win
4.00
Not rated
Value
4.50
4.42
4.50
Not rated
4.00
4.00
Not rated
Accommodation
4.00
4.14
4.17
Win
Not rated
3.33
4.00
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Convenient fixed schedules and central location
  • +Outstanding and supportive lecturers
  • +Valuable skills and practical learning opportunities
  • +Strong academic programs and faculty expertise
  • +Opportunities for practical application and professional development
  • +Supportive community and valuable alumni network
  • +Professional certification and practical learning opportunities
  • +Good facilities and helpful tutors
  • +Strong programs with skilled lecturers

Nothing to show

  • +Strong academic programs and knowledgeable lecturers
  • +Diverse range of programs and majors
  • +Good course material and practical applications
  • +Balanced theory and practical application for workforce skills.
  • +Approachable and supportive lecturers offering teamwork and project opportunities.
  • +Strong career preparation in international trade and business.

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues frustrate students.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology hinder learning.
  • -Lack of communication and unclear expectations cause confusion.
  • -Lack of alignment between course outlines and actual class content.
  • -Substandard experience for international students.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause constant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources hinder learning.
  • -A disconnect between curriculum and real-world application is a recurring complaint.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources are a problem.
  • -Communication from the institution is frequently poor.
  • -Administrative and management issues create significant problems.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of resources hinder learning.
  • -Lack of instructor engagement and course structure disappoints students.

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

This institution demonstrates notable strengths in its **Professors**, **Location**, and **Internationality**, all receiving a high rating of 4.75. **Student Life** and **Accommodation** are rated a solid 4, indicating a good overall experience. The **Value** proposition also scores well at 4.5. The **Facilities** category, while still positive at 4.25, represents the area with the lowest score.

Overall, the university receives strong ratings across multiple aspects. Professors are exceptionally well-regarded, achieving the highest score. Student life and value for money are also rated very highly. The weakest area, though still positive, is accommodation. Facilities and location also score well, demonstrating a generally positive student experience.

Across various assessments, this institution demonstrates notable strengths. Its professors, location, and perceived value all received top marks at 4.5. Areas like facilities, student life, and accommodation also scored well, averaging around 4.17. Internationality, while still positive, was the lowest-rated aspect at 4.0. Overall, the university presents a robust offering with particular excellence in its academic staff, setting, and perceived worth.

Nothing to show

Student feedback paints a generally positive picture, with **Student Life** standing out as the strongest area at 4.5. **Professors** also receive high marks. The university's **Accomodation** is identified as the weakest point, with a rating of 3.33. Overall, **Facilities**, **Location**, and **Value** are consistently rated well, indicating a solid institutional offering.

Across the board, this institution achieves commendable scores in all evaluated aspects. Facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and perceived value all stand at a strong 4 out of 5. The consistent high marks suggest a well-rounded and positive university experience with no single area significantly lagging behind others.

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

All four reviews are positive, highlighting convenient schedules for working students and excellent lecturers. The central Jakarta location is also frequently praised. No negative feedback was provided.

University of Indonesia receives overwhelmingly positive feedback (97%), with students praising its academic rigor, professional lecturers, and diverse opportunities for personal and professional growth. A small percentage of negative reviews mention specific program discrepancies.

All reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.5/5. Students praise program quality, campus facilities, and helpful staff. No negative feedback was recorded.

Nothing to show

All three reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.33/5. Students praise knowledgeable lecturers and well-balanced curricula. One reviewer noted minor issues with class registration and system functionality.

With a 4/5 average rating from one review, feedback is overwhelmingly positive. The student praised the program's blend of theory and practice, supportive lecturers, and career preparation. No negative feedback was recorded.

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
50%
64%
50%
0%
33%
0%
0%
4★
50%
31%
50%
0%
67%
100%
0%
3★
0%
3%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
3%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

International student office

I wouldn't recommend UI for Masters students especially for Faculty of Business. The course outlines are sexed up, but when it comes to class its opposite. If you're an international, better to find any other programs.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close