Universidad Rey Juan Carlos - URJC vs Escuela Superior de Diseño de Madrid vs Universidad estatal de Guayaquil - UG vs Bina Nusantara University - UBN vs Nova Southeastern University - NSU Florida
Side-by-side comparison from 172 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Excellent faculty and well-structured curriculum
- +Valuable practical experience and internship opportunities
- +Supportive environment and advantageous city location
- +Early specialization and practical experience in design fields
- +Public university option for design in Madrid
- +Passionate professors and enriching practical/theoretical learning
- +Opportunities for self-improvement and exposure to new environments/people
- +Diverse faculties and recognized programs within Ecuador
- +Diverse study programs and numerous student organizations
- +Supportive lecturers and accommodating, modern facilities
- +Opportunities for personal growth and peer connection
- +Supportive staff and personal growth opportunities
- +Engaging social events and teacher availability
- +Strong academic programs and smaller class sizes
Nothing to show
- +Knowledgeable and dedicated lecturers
- +Conducive learning environment and community
- +Affordable tuition
- -Lack of adequate English proficiency among staff and insufficient international student support.
- -Issues with academic organization, faculty, and teaching methodologies.
- -Inconsistent treatment of double-degree students and administrative challenges.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources hinder learning.
- -Poor communication and unresponsiveness from staff are common complaints.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are frequent complaints.
- -Lack of clear communication and organizational issues are a recurring problem.
- -Students express dissatisfaction with the quality and accessibility of resources and support.
- -Inefficient administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning experiences.
- -Lack of clear communication and support from faculty and staff is a problem.
- -Exaggerated claims and unmet expectations.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a persistent concern.
- -A lack of essential resources and support systems hinders the learning experience.
Academic departments at this institution are highly regarded, with professors receiving the strongest marks. Areas like student life and location also show a positive reception. On the other hand, internationality and accommodation received the lowest ratings, suggesting potential areas for improvement. The overall value and facilities fall within a moderate range.
This institution presents a consistent, though unexceptional, profile across all assessed aspects. None of the surveyed categories – facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, or value – stand out as particular strengths. Conversely, there are no areas that can be identified as significant weaknesses, with all receiving identical, neutral ratings.
Overall, this institution garners positive feedback. Its strongest areas are **Professors**, receiving a near-perfect score, and **Facilities**, **Location**, and **Value**, all scoring above 4.2. **Accommodations** present the only area falling below a 4.0 rating, marking it as the weakest aspect. The university also fares well in **Student Life** and **Internationality**.
Across various evaluated aspects, this institution receives strong marks. Internationality stands out as the highest-rated area, followed closely by its professors and overall value. Accommodation and student life also score very well. The weakest performing category, though still positive, is location.
This institution generally scores well across key aspects. Its strongest areas include Location and Internationality, both receiving a high rating of 4.57. Professors are also highly regarded at 4.43. Facilities and Student Life are rated similarly, at 4.29 and 4.14 respectively, with Accommodation also at 4.14. The sole area scoring lower than the rest is Value, which received a rating of 4.
Nothing to show
Assessing the institution's performance across various metrics reveals a diverse set of strengths and weaknesses. Student life emerges as the strongest area, with a notable 4.38 rating, closely followed by value at 4.4. Conversely, the university's location and accommodation received the lowest scores, both at 3.55. Professors and internationality are rated solidly in the mid-range.
~74% of 113 reviews are positive, praising strong faculty, well-structured curricula, and supportive communities. Minimal negative feedback (~4.4%) mentions campus comfort and international student integration.
This university receives a 4/5 average rating, with 100% of feedback being positive. Students highlight it as a strong choice for those with clear design specialization goals, appreciating the early practical experience.
The university receives very positive feedback, with ~100% of reviews being favorable. Students appreciate the enriching learning environments and the opportunity for self-improvement.
All 14 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.64/5. Students highlight engaging study programs, personal growth opportunities, and accommodating lecturers and facilities. Extracurriculars and modern campuses are also frequently praised.
Approximately 86% of reviews are positive, highlighting personal and professional growth, supportive staff, and academic opportunities. One negative review cited exaggeration of campus amenities and a disappointing experience.
Nothing to show
The university garners a 4.07/5 rating with approximately 74% of reviews being positive, highlighting approachable lecturers, a strong sense of community, and a solid academic foundation. A small percentage of feedback mentioned limited facilities.
In my opnion is not a bad university but most of the teachers have many titles and certificates that say they are very good on the discipline they teach but they are not very good in the teaching skill. I can understand that some subjects could be boring but I think they can do better effort to encourage the students in their subjects. The approach to the teachers is not bad at all, the time for having an answer to an e-mail is 1 or 2 days (not involving weekends). The classes and most of the facilities (at least in Fuenlabrada) are new and comfortable both for teachers and students. The social aspect maybe is the worse of this university (and most of the Spanish ones I think), because the students come to class from many different places and after the classes most of the link between classmates breaks, so you can´ not do university lifestyle. The Double Degree in BMA+Law that I am doing the overall thinking is that it would be useful for the future so the hopes about the future are high.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Studying English and Literature at ABSU was a transformative journey that extended far beyond the classroom. The program offered a deep dive into classic and contemporary works, fostering critical thinking and a profound appreciation for storytelling. The dedicated faculty(ELSA) as it was called encouraged thoughtful analysis and creative expression allowing me to connect literary themes with real world experiences. This course not only enriched my understanding of literature but also equipped me with essential communication and analytical skills that continue to shape my personal and professional life.
