Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies vs Minneapolis College of Art & Design vs Georgia Southern University - GSU vs Accademia Italiana - AI vs Karakoram International University - KIU
Side-by-side comparison from 29 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Strong academic programs with interdisciplinary focus
- +Excellent professors and practical knowledge
- +High reputation and valuable networking opportunities
Nothing to show
- +Supportive and knowledgeable professors
- +Strong sense of community and campus life
- +Innovative and enriching academic programs
- +Encouragement of creative exploration and personal expression in design
- +Faculty's one-to-one approach fosters critical thinking and broader perspectives
- +Highly qualified teachers
- +Good university in the region
- +Cutting-edge research and facilities
- +High-quality, intensive education
- +International environment and global career preparation
Nothing to show
- -Excessive tuition fees and poor value for money.
- -Ineffective and insensitive administrative and support services.
- -Unprofessional and judgmental staff.
Nothing to show
- -Outdated facilities and inadequate resources.
- -Poor communication and administrative inefficiencies.
- -Uninspiring teaching and a lack of practical application.
- -Administrative and communication issues are a major source of frustration.
- -Concerns exist regarding intellectual property rights for creative students.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment are a significant drawback.
- -Lack of practical application and industry relevance in coursework is disappointing.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources are a significant drawback.
- -Lack of engagement and support from instructors is disappointing.
Nothing to show
Academic excellence stands out, with a high rating for professors. Location and internationality also received positive marks. However, student life and accommodation were identified as areas needing improvement, indicated by lower scores. Facilities and overall value fall somewhere in the middle, suggesting a mixed but generally positive perception of the university's offerings.
Nothing to show
This institution garners excellent marks, particularly excelling in **Facilities** (4.56) and **Value** (4.63), suggesting a positive student experience in these regards. **Professors** (4.25) received the lowest rating, though it remains a respectable score. Other strong areas include Accommodation (4.47) and Internationality (4.5), indicating a well-rounded and welcoming environment.
This institution demonstrates significant strengths in its teaching staff and international student community, with professors receiving a rating of 4.33 and internationality scoring a solid 4. Student life and accommodation are rated a respectable 3.33, with location also performing well at 3.67. However, facilities represent a notable area for improvement, achieving the lowest score of 2.33. The overall value of the university is rated at 3.
An analysis of university ratings reveals a mixed but largely positive profile. The institution excels in key areas like **Professors, Location, Student Life, and Internationality**, all earning a strong 4 out of 5. Accommodation and Value are rated moderately at 3. Notably, **Facilities stand out as a significant weakness**, receiving the lowest score of 0. Overall, the university offers a good experience, particularly concerning its academic staff and campus environment, though infrastructural improvements are clearly needed.
This institution demonstrates notable strengths in its **Location** and **Student Life**, both receiving perfect scores. **Professors** are also highly regarded. Conversely, **Accomodation** is the area with the lowest rating, indicating potential for improvement. Other aspects like Facilities, Internationality, and Value fall within a solid, positive range, suggesting a generally well-rounded university experience.
Nothing to show
With a 3/5 average rating, reviews show ~33% negative feedback. Positive comments highlight theoretical/practical knowledge and reputation, while negative feedback points to high tuition and unhelpful administrative support.
Nothing to show
All 16 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.56/5. Students praise knowledgeable and supportive professors, a strong sense of community, and enriching international programs. The university is recognized for academic excellence and personal growth opportunities.
With an average rating of 3/5, positive feedback (~67%) highlights engaging creative programs and faculty support. Negative feedback (~33%) points to administrative communication issues and concerns about intellectual property rights.
With an average rating of 4/5, positive feedback makes up ~100% of reviews. Students highlight the university's value in their region and the qualifications of its teachers.
With 100% positive reviews and an average of 4/5 stars, students praise cutting-edge research, supportive faculty, and a diverse international environment. Some note the campus is isolated, potentially limiting social life.
Nothing to show
The Graduate Institute Geneva (IHEID) is one of the worst educational institutions in Switzerland. It's important to dive into the specifics as to why. When it comes to a master’s degree in Switzerland, tuition ranges from 500–2,000 Swiss francs, however, IHEID charges foreign students a whopping 8,000 Swiss francs. While you may argue that American universities charge more and so therefore this is a bargain, you would be dumbfounded to experience some of the educational conditions in comparison to American universities. • Scholarships: For over a decade, IHEID has shown no transparency on its scholarships. At this point, it can be assumed that something terribly wrong is going on behind the scene, as they have refused to show how many scholarship packages are provided but have justified an increase in tuition in this manner. IHEID has been audited by so many governmental agencies it reeks of fraudulent governance. The institute has been financially audited, its governance has been audited, even its sexual harassment mechanism has been audited. • Student Representation: The Institute has been called out for a lack of student involvement for years, going far as appearing in front of state officials to plead their case. It is clear however that the new director enjoys this level of student participation as she cancelled her meetings with the student association for over 3 months this past 2021 summer, to punish them, for an article that was written in the independent student press. She has called members of the association intimidating and harassing when they have advocated for better housing services. The trauma some members of the association have faced has pushed them into depression, and psychotic breaks. Alumni of the association have experienced these tactics throughout generations and is an integral part of the IHEID student association experience. • Sexual and Moral Harassment: IHEID Senior administrators have been accused of sexual harassment for over ten years, while the directrice herself has recently been accused of intimidating and threatening members of the Student Association, IHEID student journalists and independent advocates. IHEID’s most valuable asset isn't its students, but its reputation and anyone that attempts to bring anything to light is disposable. As a 2014 article states, if you do not like the Institute, you can leave”. • Career Services: As a foreign student, Switzerland is a distinctively difficult country to migrate to. You are effectively competing against the Swiss/permanent residents, and then Europeans as they are legally prioritized in terms of visas. Unless you are in one of those situations, your status will be considered a third-country national (Asians, Africans, Americans). How is it them that career services only have 1–2 people on staff for a 1000 student institution? Furthermore, the IHEID does not recognize institutional racism, and it, therefore, does not provide resistance techniques to counter these policies. • No skill-based centres: Where American universities may have writing centres, IHEID does not make any effort to close the academic gap between students whose language isn't English or may have studied in another language in their bachelors. You also do not have any math, Econ, or stats centre to gain help or tutoring when needed. • The Interdisciplinary program: Additionally, if you happened to have chosen the Masters in International Development, you will soon notice that you are actually not learning much. The quality of the core courses is far below the quality promised. Essentially, you are buying a degree and you do not need to invest too much time or effort into your courses. It is also not expected; Professors in the Interdisciplinary program do not connect with you in the same way other program professors do. Actually, the program is referred to as the Cash Cow of the Institute by professors themselves. This program will not teach you IR concepts, the bare minimum of political science, such as you would in a government 101 class. ○ Students Background: Since there are no IR or Policy sci requirements to enter this program, your peers can have studied biology or English literature. This will impact the level of academic rigour you will be exposed to. • Teaching Assistants: Their salaries have not been increased in over 7 years. When they sign their contracts they are not shown internal regulations or teaching staff regulations. They are not only the least paid in the entire country when recently told they may get a raise, but their social benefits such as unemployment are also significantly reduced. The manner in which they are treated those not encourage master students to rely on them for academic support. IHEID’s priority is to build its reputation on the backs of students, particularly students of diversity. The Institute counts on students’ ties with the institution to avoid improving its services. As a student whose visa is associated with the school, I am less likely to revolt. The same can be said for students under scholarships, or employed by it. It is a terrible place to conduct one’s study and I would not recommend it to my worst enemy. Below are some of the articles written that convey the previous facts: particularly the latest developments regarding the ongoing movement; No more silencing students.
Nothing to show
All I knew is that I wanted to help people improve their lives in an enjoyable and meaningful way. I felt a bit lost as I faced the struggle of having to choose between enjoyability and conventional healing practices. I was approached by professors who introduced an innovative holistic therapy concentration called Therapeutic Recreation (TR). Also known as Rec Therapy, TR utilizes leisure activities to improve individuals' overall well-being by focusing on the whole individual - enhancing physical, mental, social, emotional, cognitive, and spiritual health. I loved the idea of addressing all aspects of a person's life, and because all areas are connected I thought, "What better way is there than to use exciting, impactful, and successful activities for individuals with illnesses or disabilities improve their health and recovery?" Therapeutic Recreation is where Physical Therapy and Occupational Therapy meet. I enjoyed art therapy and dance therapy just much seeing first-hand how much the patients enjoyed the many recreational activities that can be applied to their individualized treatment plans. Campus life becomes a unique journey because TR is a holistic blossom while PT and OT have been blooming for quite awhile. Although my classmates and I experienced were among the first in the new program, we became the faces of having fun doing activities as class exercises. We had a unique balance of studying processes and structuring treatment plans with taking trips to the recreation center for sporting activities - much of which align for addressing all areas of life simultaneously.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
