Jawaharlal Nehru Technological University Hyderabad vs Indian Institute Of Technology Hyderabad vs Malla Reddy University vs Gitam University vs Dr.B.R. Ambedkar Open University

Side-by-side comparison from 16 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Maulana Azad National Urdu University (5.00)
Jawaharlal Nehru Technological University Hyderabad: wins 0/7 categories
Indian Institute Of Technology Hyderabad: wins 0/7 categories
Malla Reddy University: wins 0/7 categories
Gitam University: wins 1/7 categories
Dr.B.R. Ambedkar Open University: wins 0/7 categories
University of Hyderabad - Uoh/ Hcu: wins 0/7 categories
Maulana Azad National Urdu University: wins 6/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Computer Science and Engineering
Hyderabad, India
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Hyderabad, India
4.30
Read more reviews
3 reviews
×
Best programme: Computer Science and Engineering
Best programme: Computer Science
Category ratings
Facilities
3.92
Not rated
Not rated
4.33
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Win
Location
4.83
Not rated
Not rated
4.33
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Win
Professors
4.50
Not rated
Not rated
4.33
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Win
Internationality
3.75
Not rated
Not rated
4.33
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Win
Student life
4.42
Not rated
Not rated
4.33
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Win
Value
4.42
Not rated
Not rated
4.33
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Win
Accommodation
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
4.33
Win
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Strong academic reputation and rigorous curriculum
  • +Supportive and knowledgeable faculty
  • +Good infrastructure and campus environment

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • +Industry exposure and career preparation
  • +Knowledgeable and supportive faculty
  • +Diverse course offerings and peaceful environment

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • +Supportive learning environment and experienced faculty
  • +Practical learning and skill development
  • +Strong career foundation
Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of resources are common complaints.
  • -Course content and teaching quality are often criticized as poor or irrelevant.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative & management issues cause confusion and frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology hinder learning.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support is prevalent.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause confusion and frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support from faculty and staff.
Rating summary
What students say

This institution garners excellent scores, particularly excelling in its **Location** (4.83) and **Professors** (4.5). Student life and perceived value are also highly rated. Conversely, the university's **Facilities** (3.92) and **Internationality** (3.75) present the most room for improvement according to these ratings. Accommodations also received a solid, though not exceptional, score.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Across numerous aspects, this institution garners consistently high evaluations. Facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value all received a near-perfect score of 4.33. Therefore, no single area stands out as significantly stronger or weaker than the others, suggesting a well-rounded and highly satisfactory university experience.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Exceptional marks were awarded across most aspects of this institution. Facilities, professors, location, student life, and internationality all received perfect scores, indicating outstanding performance in these key areas. Accommodation presented a slight dip, scoring a 4 out of 5, representing the only area not achieving full marks. Overall, the university demonstrates significant strengths and offers excellent value.

Reviews summary
Highlights

Nearly all university reviews are positive, with ~92% rating 4-5 stars. Students highlight strong academics, good faculty support, and placement opportunities as key strengths.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

With an average rating of 4.33/5 and 0% negative feedback, students praise the university for excellent module exposure, industry interactions, and knowledgeable professors who guide student interests. Positive feedback highlights good lab facilities and campus placement reputation.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

The sole review is highly positive, highlighting a supportive learning environment, experienced faculty, and practical learning opportunities. This feedback indicates a strong focus on skill development and career preparation, with ~100% of sentiment being positive.

Rating distribution
5★
58%
0%
0%
33%
0%
0%
100%
4★
33%
0%
0%
67%
0%
0%
0%
3★
8%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close