Riphah International University vs Capital University of Science and Technology - CUST vs Pakistan Institute of Development Economics - PIDE vs Abasyn University Islamabad Campus vs Khwaja Fareed University of Engineering and Information Technology

Side-by-side comparison from 21 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
Riphah International University: wins 4/6 categories
Capital University of Science and Technology - CUST: wins 0/6 categories
Pakistan Institute of Development Economics - PIDE: wins 2/6 categories
Abasyn University Islamabad Campus: wins 0/6 categories
Khwaja Fareed University of Engineering and Information Technology: wins 0/6 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Computer Science
Best programme: Bachelor of Software Engineering
Best programme: Economics
Category ratings
Facilities
4.08
Win
4.00
4.00
Not rated
3.00
Location
4.08
Win
3.17
3.00
Not rated
4.00
Professors
4.31
4.17
5.00
Not rated
5.00
Internationality
4.00
3.50
5.00
Win
Not rated
4.00
Student life
4.17
Win
3.83
4.00
Not rated
4.00
Value
4.54
3.83
5.00
Win
Not rated
2.00
Accommodation
3.77
Win
3.17
3.00
Not rated
2.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +High quality education and knowledgeable professors
  • +Modern facilities and conducive learning environment
  • +Supportive atmosphere and vibrant campus life
  • +Academic quality and supportive faculty
  • +Diverse, accredited programs and flexible learning
  • +Scholarships and valuable soft skills development
  • +Supportive and accessible faculty
  • +Career development guidance

Nothing to show

  • +Engaging and supportive faculty
  • +Balanced curriculum with practical application
  • +Positive academic environment and skill development opportunities
Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are often cited.
  • -Communication breakdowns and lack of clear information are significant problems.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are often criticized.
  • -Inconsistent teaching quality and curriculum relevance are common complaints.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance create an unpleasant environment.
  • -Lack of essential resources and effective support systems hinder learning.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources are a significant drawback.
  • -Course content is often irrelevant or poorly delivered.
Rating summary
What students say

This university garners strong praise, particularly for its **Value**, achieving the highest rating. Professors are also highly regarded. While student life and location receive solid scores, and internationality is well-received, the **Accommodations** emerge as the relatively weakest area, though still rated above average. Facilities also perform well.

This institution presents a generally positive profile with notable strengths in its facilities and professors, both receiving ratings of 4 and above. Student life and value also score well. Conversely, location and accommodation appear to be areas for improvement, with the lowest ratings. Internationality is moderately rated.

With outstanding scores in teaching quality and global outlook, this institution shines brightly. Professors are highly rated at a perfect 5, mirroring the exceptional internationality. Conversely, the university's location and accommodation options received more moderate feedback, both scoring a 3. Facilities and student life are well-regarded, achieving solid 4s, while the overall value proposition is also rated a perfect 5, indicating strong satisfaction in these areas.

Nothing to show

This institution exhibits a notable disparity in its assessed strengths and weaknesses. Professors receive the highest commendation, scoring a perfect 5. Conversely, accommodation is the weakest area, rated at a low 2. The university also scores well in location, student life, and internationality, all achieving a 4. Facilities are moderately rated at 3, while the value proposition also received a lower score of 2.

Reviews summary
Highlights

With a 4.62/5 average rating from 13 reviews, ~100% of feedback is positive. Students highlight a strong learning environment, knowledgeable professors, and excellent facilities. No negative feedback was provided.

With a 4.83/5 average from 6 reviews, ~0% negative feedback is noted. Students praise modern facilities, flexible options, and accredited programs. Academic strength, supportive faculty, and scholarships are frequently highlighted.

This university receives overwhelmingly positive feedback, with 100% of reviews being 4–5 stars. Students particularly praise the faculty's helpfulness and openness, along with their guidance on professional and career development.

Nothing to show

With a perfect 5/5 average rating and no negative feedback, the sole review highlights a very positive experience. Strengths mentioned include well-structured courses, knowledgeable and supportive professors, and a strong academic environment.

Rating distribution
5★
62%
83%
100%
0%
100%
4★
38%
17%
0%
0%
0%
3★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close