emlyon business school vs Uttarakhand Technical University - UTU vs OP Jindal Global University - JGU vs Doon University - DA vs The University of Petroleum and Energy Studies - UPES
Side-by-side comparison from 118 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Practical and international programs with diverse students
- +Valuable professional experience through internships and work-study
- +Supportive environment for personal and professional development
- +Supportive and accessible faculty
- +Skill development and extracurricular opportunities
- +Good placement assistance and facilities
- +Practical, real-world focus and curriculum
- +Supportive faculty and positive learning environment
- +Good career prospects and specialized programs
- +Strong foreign language programs and diverse career options
- +Pleasant, green, and peaceful campus environment
- +Good faculty and sports facilities
- +Relevant, industry-aligned course content and academic focus
- +Supportive, knowledgeable faculty and good campus facilities
- +Strong career services and placement opportunities
- +Supportive faculty and interactive classes
- +Positive campus environment and student life
- +Good infrastructure and facilities
- +Experiential learning and practical application of business concepts
- +High-quality instruction and direct industry leader engagement
- +International exposure and strong peer networking opportunities
- -Lack of practical value and shallow content in courses.
- -Unfair and frustrating grading, especially for group projects.
- -Disappointing professor engagement and program support.
- -Administrative issues and lack of improvement.
- -Poor teaching quality and study experience.
- -Lack of placements after course completion.
- -High fees and perceived lack of value for money.
- -Poor quality of accommodation and food.
- -Institutional focus on finances over student welfare and study quality.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources are a significant drawback.
- -The curriculum is often perceived as irrelevant or poorly delivered.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
- -Lack of effective communication and support from staff is a recurring problem.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration and inefficiency.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning and comfort.
- -Lack of clear communication and support leaves students feeling unsupported.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor resources detract from learning.
- -Lack of clear communication and support from staff is a recurring problem.
This institution demonstrates exceptional strength in its internationality and location, both scoring above 4.5. Student life and value also received positive marks, exceeding 4.2 and 4.4 respectively. However, accommodation presents as the weakest area, with the lowest rating of approximately 3.94. Facilities and professors also received solid, though slightly lower, scores in comparison.
An assessment of this institution reveals a strong showing in key areas. Location and Professors both achieved high scores of 4.2 and 4 respectively, indicating positive student perceptions of the campus environment and the quality of teaching. Student Life and Accommodation also received favorable ratings of 4. Conversely, Facilities emerged as the weakest area, with a score of 3.4. Internationality and Value landed in the mid-range with a 3.8.
This institution demonstrates exceptional strength in its **accommodations**, achieving a near-perfect score. Facilities also received a high rating. Conversely, the **location** was the least positively reviewed aspect. Student life, internationality, and value represent solid middle-ground strengths, with professors also scoring favorably.
This university demonstrates outstanding strengths in its **Location**, which received the highest rating. **Student Life** and **Accomodation** also score highly, reflecting positive experiences in these areas. Areas for potential improvement include **Internationality**, which is the lowest-rated category, and **Professors**, alongside **Value**, which received moderate scores. **Facilities** also performed well.
This institution demonstrates considerable strengths, particularly in its **location (4.5)** and **professors (4.25)**, along with a robust **internationality (4.25)**. Areas showing slightly less positive feedback include **accommodation (3.5)**, which is the weakest point. **Facilities** and **value** also received moderate scores, hovering around 3.75. The university generally presents a well-rounded experience, with student life also scoring a solid 4.
This institution excels in several key areas, notably in Location with a score of 4.72 and Professors at 4.48. Student Life also receives a solid rating of 4. Conversely, the university's Internationality is the lowest rated aspect at 3.45, suggesting room for improvement in that domain. Facilities and Accomodation are rated moderately at 3.75, while Value sits at a respectable 3.93.
This institution garners exceptionally high marks, particularly excelling in Student Life with a perfect score. Facilities, Location, and Accomodation are also strong, all receiving 4.5 ratings. Professors and Value are rated highly at 4.67. The lowest score, though still solid, is for Internationality at 4.33.
The vast majority of university students have a positive experience, highlighting academic rigor, practical learning, and international environments. A small fraction of reviews mention disappointment with course content and grading.
Four out of five reviews are positive, averaging 4/5 stars. Students praise extracurricular activities, skill development, and supportive teachers. A small percentage of negative feedback mentions poor management and a lack of placements.
Around 74% of reviews are positive, highlighting practical learning, well-structured programs, and helpful faculty. A small portion, ~12%, expressed concerns about cost and facilities.
With an average rating of 4.17/5 from 6 reviews, feedback is ~83% positive. Students praise the pleasant, green environment, good infrastructure, and excellent foreign language programs with qualified faculty. A few mentioned a desire for more course offerings.
With an average rating of 4.75/5 from four reviews, feedback is overwhelmingly positive. Recurring themes highlight excellent course offerings aligned with industry, knowledgeable faculty, beautiful campus ambiance, and strong placement opportunities. No negative feedback was provided.
With a 4.17/5 average rating from 29 reviews, ~83% are positive. Students praise supportive faculty, interactive classes, and positive campus environment. Facilities and course outlines also received positive mentions. No negative reviews were provided.
With an average rating of 4.75/5 from four reviews, feedback is overwhelmingly positive (~100%). Students highlight hands-on learning, business idea development, and valuable connections with industry leaders and peers as significant benefits. Minimal negative feedback was present.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Being here has been such a wild ride. Moving to a new country every semester and learning local languages has been both fun and challenging, but it's kinda exhausting too. Still, that hustle gives me an adrenaline rush I low-key love! The best part has been seeing our business ideas come to life and when people genuinely appreciate and engage with something we’ve built, it makes all the hard work worth it.