University of the Philippines - UPLB vs Polytechnic University Of the Philippines - PUP vs Our Lady of Fatima University - OLFU vs Malayan Colleges Laguna - MCL vs Card-MRI Development Institute Inc. - CMDI
Side-by-side comparison from 72 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Fulfilling and high-quality education
- +Passionate and credible professors/mentors
- +Positive social environment and personal growth
- +Passionate, experienced, and inspiring professors
- +Affordable and practical education
- +Opportunities for personal growth and belonging
- +High-quality medical education and resources
- +Accessible, affordable, and versatile learning environment
- +Hands-on professors and supportive guidance
- +Modern facilities & conducive learning environment
- +Academic and personal growth opportunities
- +Impressive campus infrastructure
Nothing to show
- +Excellent medical program and on-campus hospital
- +Safe and convenient campus with recreational facilities and dorms
- +Accessible food options on campus
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment negatively impact the learning experience.
- -Lack of resources and support systems hinder academic progress.
- -Administrative and management issues, including unresponsive administration and poor professor accountability.
- -Outdated facilities and curriculum that lacks current industry knowledge.
- -Unequal treatment and dismissive attitudes towards students based on their learning choices.
- -Administrative & management issues
- -Unfriendly student environment
- -Non-conducive learning atmosphere
- -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
- -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources hinder learning.
- -The curriculum is often perceived as irrelevant or poorly executed.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of necessary resources are a common complaint.
- -Limited career services and job placement support are greatly disliked.
Nothing to show
This institution receives exceptionally high ratings, particularly excelling in Student Life with a perfect score, and achieving near-perfect marks for Location and Value. Internationality and Professors are also rated very positively. The weakest area, though still strong, is Facilities, receiving a rating of 4 out of 5.
This institution shows notable strengths in student life, with a score of 4.28, and value, rated at 4.27. Location also received a high mark at 4.17. Conversely, facilities represent the weakest area, scoring 2.77. Other categories like professors, internationality, and accommodation fall within a moderate range.
This institution receives consistently high marks, with standout scores of 4.2 in Facilities, Professors, Student Life, and Value. Internationality and Location also scored well at 4. Accommodations represent the weakest area, averaging 3.67. Overall, the university demonstrates a robust offering, particularly excelling in academic and extracurricular experiences.
This institution demonstrates notable strengths in facilities and internationality, both receiving top marks. Value for money also scores highly. However, accommodation stands out as the weakest area, with a moderate rating compared to other aspects. Professors, location, and student life are all rated positively, indicating a well-rounded experience with specific areas of excellence.
Nothing to show
This institution demonstrates a strong showing in its academic offerings, with professors receiving an excellent rating of 4 out of 5. Value for money is also highly regarded at the same score. Conversely, location and internationality are areas for potential improvement, both scoring 3. Facilities, student life, and accommodation are rated competently, all at approximately 3.67.
Nothing to show
All 9 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.67/5. Students highlight strong academic programs, passionate professors who act as mentors, and personal growth opportunities. The campus environment and student relationships are also frequently praised.
~78% of reviews are positive, highlighting passionate professors, practical learning, and personal growth opportunities. A small amount of feedback (~6%) notes issues with outdated facilities and administrative responsiveness.
~80% of reviews are positive, highlighting quality education, supportive professors, and good facilities, especially for medical courses. ~20% of feedback mentioned the teaching and campus environment were not conducive for learning.
With a 4/5 average rating, this university has overwhelmingly positive feedback, highlighting a well-maintained, modern learning environment with impressive campus infrastructure. Students appreciate the conducive atmosphere for academic and personal growth. A minor concern noted is the shift to a 14-week term.
Nothing to show
With only one positive review out of three, feedback indicates the university offers a good medical program and convenient campus facilities like an on-site hospital. No negative feedback was provided.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
For me, PUP is okay. Because it is a public university, the facilities are not that good, but considering that the tuition is free, it is good for less fortunate students who want to finish. I have good and bad experiences in PUP just like the profs who are not that hard to teach, there are profs who are very passionate about teaching.
I didn't like the teachings! The school was not quite good. The ambiance was not running. The students were not friendly. There were no many trees inside the campus. The institution was not conducive for learning.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show