Loyola College vs University of Madras vs Prist University vs Patrician College of Arts and Science - PCAS vs Manonmaniam Sundaranar University

Side-by-side comparison from 28 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Loyola College (4.50)
Loyola College: wins 1/7 categories
University of Madras: wins 0/7 categories
Prist University: wins 0/7 categories
Patrician College of Arts and Science - PCAS: wins 0/7 categories
Manonmaniam Sundaranar University: wins 5/7 categories
The Tamil Nadu Dr. M.G.R. Medical University: wins 0/7 categories
Thiruvalluvar University: wins 1/7 categories
Comparing
Chennai, India
4.50
Top
Read more reviews
15 reviews
×
Best programme: Business Administration
Best programme: Accounting and Finance
Chennai, India
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Best programme: Physics
Best programme: Physician Associate Studies
Best programme: Psychology (Developmental and Educational)
Category ratings
Facilities
4.00
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Win
3.00
4.00
Location
4.57
4.71
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Win
3.00
3.00
Professors
4.60
4.10
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Win
4.00
4.00
Internationality
4.13
3.80
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
3.00
5.00
Win
Student life
4.33
4.14
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Win
3.00
4.00
Value
4.13
Win
3.40
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
4.00
4.00
Accommodation
3.47
3.38
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Win
3.00
3.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Versatile and specialized programs
  • +Encouraging and supportive faculty
  • +Excellent facilities and campus environment
  • +Knowledgeable and approachable faculty
  • +Engaging curriculum and practical application
  • +Supportive environment and skill development

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • +Supportive and knowledgeable staff
  • +Well-equipped labs and effective curriculum
  • +Enjoyable campus life
  • +Strong academic foundation and multi-specialty exposure
  • +Good preparation for professional growth
  • +Kind and approachable professors
  • +Good study environment
  • +Well-designed marketing and business programmes
Cons
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of resources.
  • -Poor communication and disorganized administration.
  • -Limited career support and networking opportunities.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology are a recurring problem.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support from staff is a concern.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a recurring problem.
  • -Lack of effective communication and support leaves students feeling unsupported.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support is prevalent.
  • -Unresponsive and unhelpful administration.
  • -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities.
  • -Lack of clear communication and organization.
Rating summary
What students say

This institution receives high marks for its professors and location, with ratings of 4.6 and approximately 4.57 respectively. Student life and internationality also score well, both around 4.13. Facilities are rated at a solid 4. The weakest area is accommodation, which scores 3.47, indicating room for improvement in this aspect.

This institution shines particularly bright in its **location**, receiving an outstanding rating. Student life and professors also score well, indicating a positive academic and social environment. However, **accommodation** presents a notable area for improvement, scoring significantly lower than other aspects. Internationality and value are also mid-range, suggesting potential for growth in these areas.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This institution receives near-perfect scores across the board, reflecting outstanding performance in its facilities, professors, location, student life, and accommodation, all scoring a perfect five. While still strong, the university's internationality and value received slightly lower, though still excellent, ratings of four.

This institution presents a well-rounded profile, with its strongest areas being **Professors** and **Value**, both receiving a commendable rating of 4. Conversely, **Facilities**, **Location**, **Student Life**, **Accommodation**, and **Internationality** are rated at a solid 3, indicating satisfactory but not exceptional performance across these aspects.

This institution demonstrates strong internationality, receiving a perfect 5 out of 5. Key areas like facilities, professors, and student life are also well-regarded with 4-star ratings. However, the university's location and accommodation received a more moderate score of 3 stars, suggesting these aspects could be areas for development. Overall value is rated positively at 4 stars.

Reviews summary
Highlights

Students highly praise the university, with ~93% positive feedback and an average rating of 4.47/5. Recurring themes include excellent professors, varied courses, and a beautiful campus with ample facilities. Accommodation costs are noted as expensive.

With an average rating of 4.3/5, reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~80%). Students highlight excellent faculty, engaging curriculum, and career preparation. No negative feedback was received.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

With an average rating of 4/5, the single review highlights positive curriculum coverage, supportive staff, and good labs. Infrastructure and syllabus advancement are areas noted for improvement, representing ~0% negative feedback.

This university receives a positive reception, with ~100% of feedback being favorable. Students highlight a solid academic foundation and broad specialty exposure. Career guidance is noted as an area with potential for improvement.

The single review is positive, rating the university 4/5. It praises kind professors but notes concerns about litter and difficult travel due to location.

Rating distribution
5★
53%
50%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
4★
40%
30%
0%
0%
100%
100%
100%
3★
7%
20%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close