London School of Economics and Political Science - LSE vs ONCAMPUS Global vs EM Normandie - EM Normandie vs London School of International Business - LSIB vs London Academy of Trading - LAT
Side-by-side comparison from 370 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Expert, approachable faculty and high-quality teaching
- +Strong career preparation and marketable skills development
- +Excellent facilities and a supportive learning environment
- +Supportive and knowledgeable faculty
- +Excellent facilities and convenient location
- +Strong academic and personal development support
- +Practical, industry-relevant courses and inspiring professors
- +Rich international environment and diverse student body
- +Personal and professional development opportunities
- +Flexible and accessible distance learning
- +Practical, real-world application of knowledge
- +Ability to study at own pace while working
Nothing to show
- +Exceptional teaching quality from passionate, experienced instructors
- +Unmatched precision, emphasis on quality, and professional skill development
- +Welcoming environment, strong support, and valuable alumni network
- +Knowledgeable lecturers and well-structured programs
- +Useful campus facilities and student support resources
- +Rewarding and challenging academic experience
- -Poor teaching quality and unclear learning expectations.
- -Lack of structure and significant workload.
- -Disappointing careers service and limited social life.
- -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
- -Outdated facilities and poor upkeep frustrate students.
- -Lack of resources and inadequate support services are common complaints.
- -Financial concerns and perceived low educational value.
- -Outdated or poorly developed course content.
- -Ineffective instruction and lack of expert guidance.
- -Poor communication and administrative issues.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources are disappointing.
- -The curriculum feels irrelevant and disconnected from real-world needs.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of resources hinder the learning experience.
- -The curriculum is perceived as irrelevant and poorly structured.
This institution demonstrates remarkable strengths in its **Internationality** and **Location**, both receiving scores nearing 4.8. **Professors** also score highly at 4.26. Conversely, **Student Life** is the lowest-rated area, with a score of 3.64, followed by **Accomodation** at 3.79. Other aspects like Facilities and Value fall within a solid mid-range.
Overall, the university garners strong ratings across various aspects. Professors are exceptionally well-regarded, achieving the highest score. Location and Internationality also stand out with excellent marks. Student Life, Facilities, and Value also reflect positive sentiment. Accommodation, while still strong, receives the lowest rating among the surveyed categories.
This institution garners excellent marks in several key areas. Facilities, Professors, Internationality, and Value all received high scores of 4.125. Student Life and Accommodations are rated lower, at 3.625 and approximately 3.57 respectively, indicating these are areas with more room for improvement compared to its other strengths. The Location score sits at 3.75.
The university presents a varied profile, with its strongest aspects being internationality and value, both scoring a solid 4 out of 5. Conversely, facilities, location, student life, and accommodation are rated at a respectable but average 3. The academic environment, indicated by professor ratings, falls slightly above average at 3.75. Overall, the institution excels in global appeal and affordability, while other areas maintain a consistent performance level.
Nothing to show
This university demonstrates exceptional strength in its **location** (4.7), **professors** (4.6), and **internationality** (4.6). Students are particularly impressed with the quality of instruction and the global environment. Conversely, **accommodation** stands out as the lowest-rated area at 3.0, suggesting room for improvement in this aspect. Student life and value for money also received moderate scores.
Facilities and student life stand out with strong ratings of 4.5. Conversely, the university's professors and accommodation received the lowest scores at 3. The location, internationality, and overall value are rated moderately at 3.5.
Nearly 74% of reviews are positive, highlighting a supportive environment, knowledgeable faculty, and excellent facilities. A small percentage (around 3.4%) mention issues like poor lecturing, inconsistent grading, and lack of social life.
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with ~100% of 20 feedback entries rating 4–5 stars. Students praise friendly, supportive teachers, excellent facilities like the library, and effective student support services that build confidence.
Most reviews praise the inspiring professors, practical learning, and international environment, contributing to a ~74% positive sentiment. One review expressed dissatisfaction, calling it a money-making scheme with mediocre teaching.
Most university student reviews (approximately 75%) are positive, highlighting accessible distance learning and program applicability. A smaller portion (about 25%) express frustration with course content and delivery.
Nothing to show
Students highly praise the exceptional quality of teaching and knowledgeable instructors. Facilities are noted as impeccable and the learning environment welcoming, contributing to professional and personal growth for ~100% of reviewers.
With an average rating of 4 out of 5 stars, feedback is predominantly positive (~100%). Students highlight knowledgeable lecturers, well-structured programs, and useful campus facilities. There is no reported negative feedback.
LSE is a great place to create life-long connections and friends. There's a certain sense of community that is special to the university. The staff are hands-on and approachable. The facilities are modern and well-equipped.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
I rarely leave reviews, but I felt compelled to share my experience to help others make an informed decision before enrolling in this school. What was promised as a professional, expert-led learning journey turned out to be an extremely frustrating and misleading experience from start to finish. Firstly, the course content itself was a major red flag. It became quickly apparent that the material was not developed or delivered by qualified human experts. The writing style, structure, and overall quality is regurgitate and regenerated AI—often incoherent, repetitive, and lacking the depth and critical insight one would expect from an accredited educational provider. They admitted in writing to me their courses where generated by OpenAI. I could have simply gone on ChatGPT and asked for the course, without paying for it. There was little to no evidence of real academic or industry expertise behind the materials, and attempts to clarify or engage with instructors were met with vague, generic responses that did not address the content or questions raised. Secondly, and more alarmingly, this school advertises affiliations and accreditations with well-known awarding bodies to bolster its credibility. Out of concern, I contacted several of these organisations directly to verify their connection to the school. Every single one I reached out to confirmed that they have no affiliation whatsoever with the institution. This level of misrepresentation is not only unethical but borders on fraudulent, especially for prospective students relying on these claims to make decisions about their education and future. This experience has been both disappointing and infuriating. I invested time, money, and trust into this course, only to discover that it fails to meet even basic standards of legitimacy and academic integrity. To anyone considering enrolling: please do thorough research. Ask for proof of accreditation and human-led instruction. Do not rely solely on what’s displayed on the website or in promotional materials. There are many credible, high-quality educational providers out there—but unfortunately, this is not one of them.
Nothing to show
I really enjoyed my time at LCB! I've found that my skills when I entered the work force were much higher than others. I think though there was a big portion missing in recipe development and composition. True- we did learn it through memorizing the recipes, but we really were missing classes on how different ingredients affect the final textures.. how you can change them... etc. That I still am not an expert in .. and I create recipes! Ouf! Also, I don't know if you still do a month of sugar work... but that really wasn't necessary and should be either cut or minimized to just 2 lessons. It's such a niche skill to know that I would have really preferred more technical skills. I loved the old location. The "rumors" I'm getting about the new location are that it's not as good, unfortunately - that i's become more of a money focused/marketing machine. I really hope that this image can be fixed as I love LCB and enjoyed my time there! Oh also - there should be more help for students to get jobs and featuring old students accomplishments - from cookbook launches to new bakeries so that current and old students can support them.
Not enough teaching staff. Lecturers grade based on racial inclination. Cirencester is a small place with little amenities. Off campus accommodation is expensive. The school's main campus is a bit far from the main town. Course modules are not practical oriented. Good administration and support from the teaching staff
