University of Manila - UDM vs Pamantasan ng Lungsod ng Valenzuela - PLV vs Centro Escolar University - CEU vs National University - NU vs Far Eastern University

Side-by-side comparison from 32 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: University of the Philippines Manila - UPM (5.00)
University of Manila - UDM: wins 0/3 categories
Pamantasan ng Lungsod ng Valenzuela - PLV: wins 0/3 categories
Centro Escolar University - CEU: wins 0/3 categories
National University - NU: wins 0/3 categories
Far Eastern University: wins 0/3 categories
STI Colleges: wins 0/3 categories
University of the Philippines Manila - UPM: wins 3/3 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Computer Application
Best programme: BS Information Technology
Best programme: BSC Medical Laboratory Technology
Manila, Philippines
4.00
Read more reviews
3 reviews
×
Best programme: Accounting
Manila, Philippines
4.30
Read more reviews
12 reviews
×
Best programme: Political Science
Alaminos, Philippines
4.40
Read more reviews
5 reviews
×
Best programme: Computer and Information Science
Best programme: Behavioral and Social Sciences
Category ratings
Facilities
2.50
4.67
4.20
3.33
4.42
4.20
5.00
Win
Location
2.00
5.00
4.60
4.00
4.50
4.60
5.00
Professors
4.00
4.33
4.20
3.67
4.42
4.80
5.00
Win
Internationality
2.50
4.00
4.20
3.67
4.00
4.60
5.00
Win
Student life
2.50
5.00
4.40
4.00
4.73
5.00
5.00
Value
3.50
5.00
4.60
4.33
4.58
4.60
5.00
Accommodation
3.00
5.00
4.60
2.67
4.45
4.00
5.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Innovative and forward-thinking approach to student development
  • +Welcoming and supportive campus environment with accessible faculty
  • +Strong academic standards and scholarship opportunities
  • +Free tuition and social service contribution
  • +Supportive professors and manageable workload
  • +IT program specialization
  • +Welcoming atmosphere and approachable faculty
  • +Opportunities for skill development and extracurriculars
  • +Well-equipped facilities for science and practical learning
  • +High-quality education and supportive professors
  • +Financial aid options and focus on student well-being
  • +Academic and extracurricular support
  • +Welcoming and diverse community
  • +Supportive and professional faculty
  • +Inspiring and refreshing campus environment
  • +Inspiring faculty and practical skills development
  • +Supportive and inclusive community
  • +Engaging and enjoyable learning experiences
  • +Health and science focus
  • +Practical communication skills
Cons
  • -Lack of qualified professors and insufficient facilities.
  • -Overload of redundant subjects and lackluster programs.
  • -Minimal competitive program activities.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause constant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of necessary resources are a major problem.
  • -The curriculum and teaching methods are often perceived as irrelevant and unengaging.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning experiences.
  • -Overcrowding and large class sizes reduce individual attention.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources negatively impact the learning environment.
  • -Poor communication and a lack of student support are major concerns.
  • -Administrative & management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources hinder the learning experience.
  • -Inconsistent teaching quality and lack of engagement from instructors are disappointing.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a significant drawback.
  • -Unclear communication and a disorganized learning environment are frustrating.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources hinder learning.
  • -Communication and feedback from instructors are often lacking or poor.
Rating summary
What students say

Analyzing the provided ratings reveals a university with distinct strengths and areas for improvement. Professors achieve a notably high score of 4, indicating excellent academic guidance. Conversely, the location and facilities are the weakest points, each scoring a low 2. Student life and internationality also receive moderate ratings of 2.5, while accommodation and value for money present a more favorable picture with scores of 3 and 3.5 respectively.

This institution excels in several key areas, with perfect scores for Location, Student Life, and Accommodation, alongside a top rating for Value. Facilities are also highly regarded at 4.67. The weakest area noted is Internationality, with a rating of 4, while Professors are rated slightly lower at 4.33. Overall, it presents a very positive picture with standout strengths.

This institution garners exceptional ratings across several key areas, particularly excelling in **Location** and **Accomodation**, both achieving a perfect 4.6. **Student Life** is also highly regarded at 4.4. The university demonstrates strong performance in **Facilities**, **Professors**, and **Internationality**, each scoring 4.2. While all metrics are positive, the ratings for **Facilities**, **Professors**, and **Internationality** represent the comparatively lower, though still good, scores within this otherwise excellent profile.

This university presents a mixed but generally positive picture. It excels in **Value**, receiving the highest rating, and also scores very well for **Location** and **Student Life**. Conversely, **Accomodation** stands out as its weakest area. Ratings for **Professors** and **Internationality** are solid, while **Facilities** fall in the middle range.

The university shines brightest in student life, achieving a remarkable 4.73 rating. Location and value are also highly regarded at 4.5 and 4.58 respectively. On the other hand, internationality received the lowest score at 4.0, indicating room for improvement in this area. Facilities, professors, and accommodation all received solid marks between 4.4 and 4.45.

This institution demonstrates exceptional strengths in student life, receiving a perfect score. Professors are also highly regarded, with a near-perfect rating. Areas for potential improvement include accommodation, which scored a solid but lower 4.0, representing the weakest aspect. Overall, the university presents a robust offering across its facilities, location, internationality, and value.

Across the board, this institution garners perfect scores, indicating excellence in every surveyed area. Particularly outstanding are its facilities and professors, both receiving top marks. While no weak areas are identified, the consistent five-star ratings suggest a remarkably well-rounded and highly desirable university experience across all aspects of student life, accommodation, internationality, and overall value.

Reviews summary
Highlights

Two out of three reviews are positive, highlighting innovation, a good learning environment, and competitive programs. One review expressed concerns about qualified professors and facilities.

With an average rating of 4.67/5, all three reviews are positive, highlighting tuition-free education and supportive professors. Students appreciate the social service component and balanced workloads, though some suggest expanding IT program specializations.

All 5 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.8/5. Recurring themes include a welcoming atmosphere, approachable and effective professors, and well-equipped facilities.

With an average rating of 4/5 from 3 reviews, feedback is overwhelmingly positive (~67%). Students highlight quality education, supportive professors, and available scholarships. A minor point (~33%) noted issues with student accommodation during enrollment.

With a 4.33 average rating from 12 reviews, student feedback is overwhelmingly positive (~100%). Recurring themes highlight a welcoming and diverse community, expert faculty, and excellent facilities. Some students noted a lack of program-specific exploration, particularly in fieldwork.

All 5 reviews are positive (100%), with an average rating of 4.4/5. Students praise teaching quality, supportive faculty, and practical skills for career success. They also appreciate facilities and a fun learning environment.

The single review for the university is highly positive, giving a 5/5 rating. This suggests ~100% satisfaction, with commendations for its focus on health and sciences, and valuable learning in behavioral science.

Rating distribution
5★
0%
67%
80%
33%
33%
40%
100%
4★
67%
33%
20%
33%
67%
60%
0%
3★
0%
0%
0%
33%
0%
0%
0%
2★
33%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

A good example

In this university i found peace , friends and the quality education , its not only lectures but they make sure that the students are enjoying while learning . They will mold you into a quality employee or a future boss of your desired business , and that's what i love from them .

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close