emlyon business school vs L'École de Design Nantes Atlantique vs London School of Commerce - LSC vs OP Jindal Global University - JGU vs Devi Ahilya Vishwavidyalaya - DAVV
Side-by-side comparison from 82 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Practical, international focus and diverse student body.
- +Strong career support and professional experience opportunities.
- +Diverse program options and personal project development.
- +Supportive environment & welcoming community
- +Prestigious European university for design
- +Focus on practical application over theory
- +Accessible resources and supportive faculty
- +Engaging learning environment and quality instruction
- +Opportunities for exposure and growth
- +Practical, real-world focus and curriculum
- +Supportive faculty and positive learning environment
- +Good career prospects and specialized programs
- +Strong academic programs and practical learning
- +Supportive faculty and helpful staff
- +Valuable career preparation and placement assistance
Nothing to show
- +Strong sense of community and professional networking
- +Valuable academic resources and accreditation
- +Supportive student-led initiatives
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources hinder learning.
- -Poor communication and unclear expectations lead to dissatisfaction.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Facilities are outdated and poorly maintained.
- -Ineffective teaching and curriculum create learning difficulties.
- -Administrative and communication issues cause stress.
- -Lack of support is a recurring problem.
- -High fees and perceived lack of value for money.
- -Poor quality of accommodation and food.
- -Institutional focus on finances over student welfare and study quality.
- -Frustration with administrative and management issues.
- -Disappointment in outdated facilities and equipment.
- -Lack of career support and relevant practical experience.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
- -Communication from instructors and the institution is poor.
This institution demonstrates a generally positive standing, with its strongest areas being **Location** and **Internationality**, both scoring above 4.6. **Student Life** and **Value** also received high marks, around 4.3 and 4.49 respectively. The **Facilities** and **Professors** are rated well, in the low 4s. **Accomodation** appears to be the relatively weakest area, with a score of 4.
Offering a well-rounded experience, this institution excels in its facilities, professor quality, accommodation, and internationality, all receiving a strong rating of 4. While student life and location are rated a respectable 3, these areas represent opportunities for improvement compared to its more robust aspects. Overall, the university presents a very positive offering.
This institution shines brightest in its location, receiving a near-perfect score. Student life and internationality are also areas of moderate strength. Conversely, accommodation stands out as a significant weakness, along with the perceived value of the education. Ratings for facilities and professors are average.
This institution demonstrates exceptional strength in its **accommodations**, achieving a near-perfect score. Facilities also received a high rating. Conversely, the **location** was the least positively reviewed aspect. Student life, internationality, and value represent solid middle-ground strengths, with professors also scoring favorably.
This institution garners excellent feedback across multiple facets, with its Location being the top-rated area. Facilities and Student Life also received very strong scores. Areas receiving the most moderate ratings include Accomodation and Internationality, followed closely by Value. Professors are also rated highly, indicating a well-rounded university experience.
Nothing to show
This institution boasts excellent scores in key areas, with particularly strong showings for Professors and Value, both rated at 4.5. Facilities, Location, and Student Life are also well-regarded with scores of 4. Accomodation and Internationality present the weakest points, each receiving a rating of 3.5, indicating room for improvement in these aspects.
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~90% 4-5 stars) with an average rating of 4.53/5. Students praise the academic rigor, practical and international focus, and diverse student body.
The university receives strong positive feedback, with 100% of reviews being positive. Students highlight a welcoming environment for international students and supportive teachers. Some desire more challenging main projects and theoretical lectures.
The university receives predominantly positive feedback (~75%) with students praising supportive instructors and good facilities. A smaller portion of reviews (~25%) notes administrative delays and communication issues.
Around 74% of reviews are positive, highlighting practical learning, well-structured programs, and helpful faculty. A small portion, ~12%, expressed concerns about cost and facilities.
All 7 reviews are positive (100%), with an average rating of 4.57/5. Students praise strong career preparation, helpful faculty, and excellent industry connections.
Nothing to show
The university receives positive feedback (~100%) with students highlighting a strong sense of community and good professional networking opportunities. While no negative reviews were provided, one positive comment mentioned challenges for international students regarding limited community presence and off-campus work restrictions.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
