Kyiv National Economic University named after Vadym Hetman vs The Catholic University of America vs University of Technology of Compiègne - UTC vs Cyprus West University - CWU vs Gerrit Rietveld Academie

Side-by-side comparison from 39 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: University of Technology of Compiègne - UTC (5.00)
Kyiv National Economic University named after Vadym Hetman: wins 0/4 categories
The Catholic University of America: wins 4/4 categories
University of Technology of Compiègne - UTC: wins 0/4 categories
Cyprus West University - CWU: wins 0/4 categories
Gerrit Rietveld Academie: wins 0/4 categories
Prince Abubakar Audu University - PAAU: wins 0/4 categories
Universidade Federal de Lavras: wins 0/4 categories
Comparing
Washington, D.C., United States
4.00
Read more reviews
1 reviews
×
Best programme: Business Administration in Management
Best programme: Engineering
Amsterdam, The Netherlands
4.00
Read more reviews
1 reviews
×
Best programme: Digital Media Arts
Best programme: Public Administration
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Category ratings
Facilities
3.00
5.00
Win
4.00
Not rated
3.00
3.53
Not rated
Location
4.00
5.00
Win
3.00
Not rated
3.00
3.45
Not rated
Professors
4.00
5.00
5.00
Not rated
4.00
3.94
Not rated
Internationality
3.00
5.00
5.00
Not rated
5.00
3.55
Not rated
Student life
4.50
5.00
5.00
Not rated
3.00
3.79
Not rated
Value
3.50
5.00
Win
4.50
Not rated
3.00
4.06
Not rated
Accommodation
2.50
5.00
Win
3.50
Not rated
3.00
3.43
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Strong academic programs and supportive faculty.
  • +Positive student atmosphere and community.
  • +Opportunities for practical experience and international exchange.
  • +Easy admissions and accessible, helpful advisors
  • +Responsive and timely communication from staff
  • +High-quality teaching and diverse program options
  • +Supportive environment and student association funding
  • +Professional and personal development opportunities

Nothing to show

  • +Concept-based, boundary-pushing artistic exploration
  • +Endless variety of skills and experimentation
  • +Engaging campus environment and vibrant student life
  • +Supportive and knowledgeable lecturers
  • +Affordable tuition and good academic programs

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Pervasive corruption and a focus on extracting money.
  • -Inadequate and unengaging teaching from unmotivated lecturers.
  • -Wasted time with little real value gained.
  • -Lack of adequate administrative support and poor communication.
  • -Outdated or insufficient facilities and learning resources.
  • -Overcrowded classes and lack of individual attention.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources negatively impact learning.
  • -Lack of effective communication and support is a recurring problem.

Nothing to show

  • -Outdated facilities and lack of resources are major concerns.
  • -Inefficient administrative and management processes cause frustration.
  • -Poor communication and lack of clear academic guidance are prevalent complaints.
  • -Administrative and management issues are frequently cited.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are common complaints.
  • -Lack of resources and academic support frustrates many students.

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

This institution demonstrates particular strengths in **Student Life**, receiving a high rating of 4.5. **Location** and **Professors** are also well-regarded, both scoring 4. **Accomodation** stands out as the weakest area, with a rating of 2.5. **Facilities**, **Internationality**, and **Value** fall within the mid-range of scores.

Exceptional scores define this university's performance across all assessed areas. Every category, including Facilities, Professors, Location, Student Life, Accommodation, Internationality, and Value, received a perfect rating of 5. This indicates a uniformly outstanding experience, with no single aspect significantly outperforming others; the university demonstrates remarkable consistency in its strengths.

Overall, this institution exhibits a strong profile, particularly excelling in **Professors**, **Student Life**, and **Internationality**, all receiving perfect scores. Its **Facilities** and **Value** are also highly rated. The **Location** and **Accomodation**, however, are areas with comparatively lower scores, indicating potential for improvement in these aspects.

Nothing to show

This institution demonstrates a significant strength in **Internationality**, receiving a perfect score of 5. In contrast, its **Facilities**, **Location**, **Student Life**, **Accomodation**, and **Value** all received a rating of 3, indicating average performance in these areas. The **Professors** are notably well-regarded, with a rating of 4.

Overall, the university garners a positive reception with a standout rating in **Value**. Areas such as **Student Life** and **Internationality** also received strong scores. Conversely, **Accomodation** and **Location** were areas with the lowest reported satisfaction. **Professors** earned a commendable rating, demonstrating a generally well-regarded academic environment.

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

With an average rating of 3.25/5, feedback is split evenly between positive and negative. Students praised good staff and interesting programs, while others cited corruption and unengaging teaching.

With a 4/5 average rating, feedback is largely positive (~100%). Students found the admissions process easy and advisors readily available and helpful with class scheduling and registration.

With a perfect 5/5 average rating from two reviews, sentiment is overwhelmingly positive. Students highlight high-quality teaching, flexible study paths, and a supportive environment for personal and professional development.

Nothing to show

With a 4/5 average rating from one review, this institution is praised for fostering artistic exploration and concept-based learning. While it excels for boundary-pushing students, some may find the lack of structure challenging.

With a 4.06 average rating from 31 reviews, approximately 74% of feedback is positive, highlighting enjoyable campus life, supportive lecturers, and effective learning. No negative reviews were recorded.

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
25%
0%
100%
0%
0%
29%
0%
4★
25%
100%
0%
0%
100%
48%
0%
3★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
23%
0%
2★
50%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Good

I would recommend the university! I like the good friends God connected me to and how I became even more serious because of them! Aldo some of the lecturers are nice and others ain’t but overall I would recommend though the School body should look into improving her standards in terms of curriculum!

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close