Shaheed Zulfikar Ali Bhutto Institute of Science and Technology - SZABIST vs National University of Modern Languages vs Riphah International University vs Allama Iqbal Open University vs Air University Islamabad

Side-by-side comparison from 69 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Pakistan Institute of Development Economics - PIDE (5.00)
Shaheed Zulfikar Ali Bhutto Institute of Science and Technology - SZABIST: wins 0/6 categories
National University of Modern Languages: wins 3/6 categories
Riphah International University: wins 0/6 categories
Allama Iqbal Open University: wins 0/6 categories
Air University Islamabad: wins 0/6 categories
Pakistan Institute of Development Economics - PIDE: wins 3/6 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Bachelor of Business Administration
Best programme: English Literature and Linguistics
Best programme: Computer Science
Best programme: Applied Linguistics and Second Language Acquisition
Islamabad, Pakistan
4.10
Read more reviews
9 reviews
×
Best programme: AI and Data Management
Best programme: Economics
Category ratings
Facilities
3.69
4.08
4.08
3.25
4.00
4.00
Location
4.13
4.83
Win
4.08
4.67
4.25
3.00
Professors
4.44
4.42
4.31
4.50
4.33
5.00
Win
Internationality
3.25
4.23
4.00
4.75
3.33
5.00
Win
Student life
4.07
4.28
Win
4.17
4.25
3.78
4.00
Value
3.75
4.42
4.54
4.25
4.11
5.00
Win
Accommodation
2.63
3.92
Win
3.77
3.33
3.22
3.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Supportive and qualified faculty providing engaging guidance.
  • +High-quality programs with a focus on student development.
  • +Inspiring atmosphere and excellent facilities.
  • +High-quality faculty and teaching methods
  • +Strong academic programs with relevant and up-to-date content
  • +Supportive learning environment and flexible schedules
  • +High quality education and knowledgeable professors
  • +Modern facilities and conducive learning environment
  • +Supportive atmosphere and vibrant campus life
  • +Flexible study options for work and home
  • +Responsive tutors and timely feedback
  • +High-quality, relevant academic syllabus
  • +Cooperative faculty & student-centric feedback
  • +Practical, real-world application of learning
  • +Strong, modern curriculum with specialized programs
  • +Supportive and accessible faculty
  • +Career development guidance
Cons
  • -Inefficient administrative processes and poor communication are frustrating.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources hinder learning.
  • -Limited career support and unclear future prospects cause concern.
  • -Unfair grading, favoritism, and unprofessional/rude teacher and staff conduct.
  • -Lack of transparency in internal evaluations.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are often cited.
  • -Communication breakdowns and lack of clear information are significant problems.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of resources are a problem.
  • -Communication gaps lead to confusion and dissatisfaction.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources are a major concern.
  • -Course content and teaching quality are often perceived as inadequate.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance create an unpleasant environment.
  • -Lack of essential resources and effective support systems hinder learning.
Rating summary
What students say

Academic and student life aspects generally shine, with **Professors** receiving the highest marks (4.44) and **Student Life** (4.07) and **Location** (4.13) also scoring well. Conversely, **Accomodation** presents a clear area for improvement, indicated by the lowest rating (2.63). **Facilities** (3.69) and **Value** (3.75) fall in the mid-range, while **Internationality** (3.25) scores moderately.

This institution garners impressive marks, particularly excelling in **location**, receiving the highest score. **Professors** and **value** also stand out with strong ratings. Conversely, **accommodation** represents the lowest-rated aspect, suggesting areas for potential improvement within student living arrangements. Overall, the university presents a generally positive picture with a few standout strengths.

This university garners strong praise, particularly for its **Value**, achieving the highest rating. Professors are also highly regarded. While student life and location receive solid scores, and internationality is well-received, the **Accommodations** emerge as the relatively weakest area, though still rated above average. Facilities also perform well.

This institution showcases exceptional strengths in its **location (4.67)** and **internationality (4.75)**, indicating a highly desirable and globally connected environment. **Professors (4.5)** also receive very high marks. Conversely, **facilities (3.25)** and **accommodation (3.33)** are areas where the university's performance is comparatively lower, suggesting potential for improvement in these aspects. Other areas like student life and value fall within a positive range.

Academically and experientially, the university receives strong marks. Professors are highly rated at 4.33, closely followed by location at 4.25 and value at 4.11. Facilities also score well with a 4. Student life, while decent at 3.78, is a relative area for improvement, and accommodation at 3.22 and internationality at 3.33 are the lowest-scoring aspects.

With outstanding scores in teaching quality and global outlook, this institution shines brightly. Professors are highly rated at a perfect 5, mirroring the exceptional internationality. Conversely, the university's location and accommodation options received more moderate feedback, both scoring a 3. Facilities and student life are well-regarded, achieving solid 4s, while the overall value proposition is also rated a perfect 5, indicating strong satisfaction in these areas.

Reviews summary
Highlights

With an average rating of 4.06/5, approximately 75% of reviews are positive, highlighting friendly atmospheres, helpful teachers, and engaging classes. Negative feedback is minimal, representing about 0% of all feedback.

University reviews are predominantly positive (~96%), highlighting knowledgeable faculty, high-quality education, and a supportive learning environment. A small minority (~4%) expressed concerns about biased grading and unprofessional staff behavior.

With a 4.62/5 average rating from 13 reviews, ~100% of feedback is positive. Students highlight a strong learning environment, knowledgeable professors, and excellent facilities. No negative feedback was provided.

University reviews are overwhelmingly positive (100%), with students praising accessible study materials, responsive tutors, and a flexible study system. Graduates also report strong employment prospects.

With ~89% positive sentiment, students praise cooperative faculty and practical learning, highlighting opportunities for academic and personal growth. A small amount of feedback (~11%) did not contain negative comments.

This university receives overwhelmingly positive feedback, with 100% of reviews being 4–5 stars. Students particularly praise the faculty's helpfulness and openness, along with their guidance on professional and career development.

Rating distribution
5★
31%
50%
62%
75%
33%
100%
4★
44%
46%
38%
25%
44%
0%
3★
25%
0%
0%
0%
22%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
4%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

NUML

Numl is one of the best universities in Pakistan. Numl is also internationally recognised. It provides quality education and great sports, library, and scholarship facilities to its students. NUML has good faculty and administration.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close